Equal 4.8GHz one core boost.
Skylake:
https://www.cpu-monkey.com/en/cpu-intel_core_i5_10600k-1141
Rocket Lake | Willow Cove +20% at the same clocks:
https://www.cpu-monkey.com/en/cpu-intel_core_i7_1185g7-1614
-
Competitor rules
Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.
AMD Zen 3 (5000 Series), rumored 17% IPC gain.
- Thread starter AStaley
- Start date
- Status
Equal 4.8GHz one core boost.
Skylake:
https://www.cpu-monkey.com/en/cpu-intel_core_i5_10600k-1141
Rocket Lake | Willow Cove +20% at the same clocks:
https://www.cpu-monkey.com/en/cpu-intel_core_i7_1185g7-1614
Equal 4.8GHz one core boost.
Skylake:
https://www.cpu-monkey.com/en/cpu-intel_core_i5_10600k-1141
Rocket Lake | Willow Cove +20% at the same clocks:
https://www.cpu-monkey.com/en/cpu-intel_core_i7_1185g7-1614
5800X @ 4.8Ghz 631.
So Intel's first new architecture since Skylake is 5.5% per clock slower than Zen 3.
We don't know yet how high Rocket Lake SKUs are going to be clocked. If 5.2-5.3GHz single-core boost?
Yeah maybe 5.7Ghz or 6.1Ghz, hey?
I said 5.3 GHz which has already been achieved on an older 10-core CPU:
https://ark.intel.com/content/www/u...0900k-processor-20m-cache-up-to-5-30-ghz.html
Are you trolling now?
I said 5.3 GHz which has already been achieved on an older 10-core CPU:
https://ark.intel.com/content/www/u...0900k-processor-20m-cache-up-to-5-30-ghz.html
Are you trolling now?
Kettle, pot, black much?
I said 5.3 GHz which has already been achieved on an older 10-core CPU:
https://ark.intel.com/content/www/u...0900k-processor-20m-cache-up-to-5-30-ghz.html
Are you trolling now?
That's a 10900K.
According to the Steam Survey, 99.04% of all subscriptions/users have from 1-core to 8-core CPUs.
According to AMD's own product positioning, 8-core is Performance tier and everything above is Enthusiast tier.
This reminds us of Intel's behaviour when the 4-core CPUs had been the Performance tier till March 2017.
https://store.steampowered.com/hwsurvey/cpus/
According to the Steam Survey, 99.04% of all subscriptions/users have from 1-core to 8-core CPUs.
According to AMD's own product positioning, 8-core is Performance tier and everything above is Enthusiast tier.
This reminds us of Intel's behaviour when the 4-core CPUs had been the Performance tier till March 2017.
https://store.steampowered.com/hwsurvey/cpus/
And?
We need competition to take us out of this - we need more than 8 cores to be lower tiers.
Maybe Zen 4.
Soldato
- Joined
- 14 Aug 2009
- Posts
- 3,428
I can drop 73 overpriced CPUs on the floor and count them instantly!Sometimes these threads are like watching the Rainman
Ooh, interesting. I thought Intel might snatch the single core performance lead back.Equal 4.8GHz one core boost.
Skylake:
https://www.cpu-monkey.com/en/cpu-intel_core_i5_10600k-1141
Rocket Lake | Willow Cove +20% at the same clocks:
https://www.cpu-monkey.com/en/cpu-intel_core_i7_1185g7-1614
Clock speeds of one architecture can't be taken granted for different architecture.I said 5.3 GHz which has already been achieved on an older 10-core CPU:
https://ark.intel.com/content/www/u...0900k-processor-20m-cache-up-to-5-30-ghz.html
Are you trolling now?
Already architectures themselves have effect to how well CPUs clock.
(with easily clocking architectures usually not good for IPC)
And with same old 14nm++++++ heat output of those bigger fatter cores with lot more transistors could well limit clocks.
Remember that architecture was designed from the ground up for 10nm.
Like that pair's first meeting, some people will still call Intel vs AMD a draw!
Absolutely, for me Intel's power consumption and associated heat makes it totally uncompetitive.
- Status