Caporegime
- Joined
- 21 Jun 2006
- Posts
- 38,363
You don't have sex for pleasure then Sonny? Your poor partner![]()
What an absurd idea or question. All humans do.
You don't have sex for pleasure then Sonny? Your poor partner![]()
So you’d rather kids live in care than with loving parents that may have fallen on hard times , you obviously have no clue how much it cost to keep a child in care, also it’s a completely repugnant idea! Well done you win the award for most right wing post of the day. Maybe you’d also consider chemical neutering for the parents too.
Why would they go against and MPs claims and not the office in question?
It was a general query if I'm honest. Without looking at them myself, i couldn't tell you if they split it by home, area office etc.
It just wouldn't surprise me if it all comes under the MP though. After all, they "run" the local area department as such.
Why would they go against and MPs claims and not the office in question?
Expenses usually include office and staffing costs, it's one of the reasons why London/big city based MPs tend to have much higher claimed expenses.
I didn't say that at all.
If they haven't contributed at all then yeah.
If they have fallen on hard times they would get support.
Maybe try reading one sentence stopping and understanding it before proceeding to the next.
Don't pay into the system you get help for say 6 months max before your kids are taken off you. I'd rather money go to institutions
I read the below
I didn’t really need to read much further than that to understand what a compassionate individual you are, just bile.
Selective quoting brilliant.
I said to begin with I'm all for a system where those that have consistently paid in get support and help.
If you have never paid in then yeah 6 months max that's enough time to get your act together.
Selective quoting brilliant.
I said to begin with I'm all for a system where those that have consistently paid in get support and help.
If you have never paid in then yeah 6 months max that's enough time to get your act together.
How can a child "pay in"?
Lol.
Do children get paid benefits? No their parents do.
Really?
Exactly. Neither of us are in a position to judge and condemn are we? There's always a bigger fish.
People aren't too poor to feed their kids, the money is there, they're just ******* stupid ******** and need to be punished instead of rewarded for their **** ups

just revolting right wing nonsense
Hilarious you think that wanting to stop the root cause of the issue instead of just sweeping it under the carpet equates to being right wing
So good of you to let them have six months, how magnanimous of you, after that let me have it both barrels.
So good of you to let them have six months, how magnanimous of you, after that let me have it both barrels.
Out of interest why six month, I presume a number you’ve plucked out of your rear end like the rest of repugnant policy?