Associate
- Joined
- 2 Oct 2020
- Posts
- 36
No, I think you should always be honest, and specific where possible. The problem is, being specific in this case will lead to people being let down, no matter how much OC might try to qualify the numbers with "subject to change". People will see the numbers and get excited. If they're managing to overpromise and underdeliver while being as vague as this, imagine what it'd be like if they did provide dates!Do you honestly think that communicating honestly and specifically is a bad idea?
It’s pretty much day 1, lesson 1 of customers service training.
Edit: Its funny because your example is pretty much what some of us have been through this week:
An ok amount (~50) of TUFs was due in. Therefore anyone under say, position 40 thinks “great, that means I’ll get my card”.
The guy at position 25 hasn’t received a despatch notice. So it turns out something has gone awry. But no one from OC can be arsed to tell the paying customers.
So we were over promised, under delivered and kept in the dark. And you’re ok with that?
I'm happy with the weekly queue emails tbh. I know that, no matter what OC say, the delivery estimates will always be subject to change, so it doesn't matter to me. The queue number keeps going down, and the card gets here when it gets here. All I'm really saying is that they've had a steaming turd dropped in front of them and they have to try and polish it up in a way that keeps 2-3000 customers minimum, who've all shelled out the thick end of a grand for a product, happy. It's an impossible task.