Why is discrimination so widely accepted and carried out during these supposedly tolerant times?

But with the Welsh having their own flag, language etc wouldn't they be a distinct separate group?
Same with schotland?
But its not generally considered acceptable even if they are white and they are being or have been investigated.My understanding is that it's generally considered acceptable in Britain to discriminate against ethnicities...... so long as they're white...
If they were any other ethnicity then it would clearly be racism and Pontin's works likely be under investigation by the authorities and facing a large fine and legal action . But according to most "anti-racism" definitions you can't be racist towards white people so.....
The Prime Minister's spokesman said today: 'No one in the UK should be discriminated against because of their race or ethnicity.
'It's right that the Equalities and Human Rights Commission and Pontins investigate and address this.'
The EHRC said today it has now signed a legally binding agreement with Pontins' parent company, Britannia Jinky Jersey Limited, to prevent racial discrimination.
The commission's executive director, Alastair Pringle, said: 'It is hard not to draw comparisons with an 'undesirable guests' list and the signs displayed in hotel windows fifty years ago, explicitly barring Irish people and Black people.
'Banning people from services based on their race is discrimination and is unlawful. To say that such policies are outdated is an understatement.
'It is right to challenge such practices and any business that believes this is acceptable should think again before they find themselves facing legal action
Why is discrimination so widely accepted and carried out during these supposedly tolerant times?Pontins used a secret blacklist titled 'undesirable guests' to ban customers with 40 common Irish surnames in a bid to stop Traveller families booking holidays at its parks.
ahh accuracy
i've met/known a bunch of people with surnames on that list.
i'll let people hazard a guess how many of those people were members of the travelling community.....
Knew they'd be a thread on this when I saw the article this morning. I'd honestly never heard of travellers until I saw a thread bashing them a while back, never knew they were so hated and I still find it baffling that it's widely acceptable to **** on a race of people.


But its not generally considered acceptable even if they are white and they are being or have been investigated.
But I will ask the question,
Is Irish now a race/ethnicity?
Knew they'd be a thread on this when I saw the article this morning. I'd honestly never heard of travellers until I saw a thread bashing them a while back, never knew they were so hated and I still find it baffling that it's widely acceptable to **** on a race of people.
Knew they'd be a thread on this when I saw the article this morning. I'd honestly never heard of travellers until I saw a thread bashing them a while back, never knew they were so hated and I still find it baffling that it's widely acceptable to **** on a race of people.
Sounds oddly sheltered that you're oblivious to travellers/gypsies and their long (hundreds of years) history of living in mobile homes, often occupying land they don't have any permission for until they move on of their own will or not and their reputation of taking liberties with the property and goods of homes and businesses in the area around them.
Bottom line is they are extremely eccentric, turn up in significant numbers and basically squat on any available land where they can park their vehicles. They are unlikely to be open with how they finance themselves partly because you're an outsider asking and partly because it's sketchy as hell.
They have some rights to live as they do but the disruption they bring is rarely welcome.
Yes, it does seem to be political.
England, Scotland and Wales have quite different cultures in some ways, Wales have a different language for God's sake, yet apparently we are the same ethnicity and the Irish aren't. So I don't know what yardstick they are using apart from nationalism.
I don't understand why they'd even want to go to Pontins because Pontins don't allow dags.
Sounds oddly sheltered that you're oblivious to travellers/gypsies and their long (hundreds of years) history of living in mobile homes, often occupying land they don't have any permission for until they move on of their own will or not and their reputation of taking liberties with the property and goods of homes and businesses in the area around them.
Bottom line is they are extremely eccentric, turn up in significant numbers and basically squat on any available land where they can park their vehicles. They are unlikely to be open with how they finance themselves partly because you're an outsider asking and partly because it's sketchy as hell.
They have some rights to live as they do but the disruption they bring is rarely welcome.
Yeah, I think "travellers" is actually quite a nice word for them and that's where @explicit4u is finding conceptual favour. "Peasant scum" is better. We had some recently who pitched their tents in the local bus shelter, filled the place with crap - old books, rags, furniture, broken glass - urinated against the walls, **** behind bushes and turned the place into a trash-filled cesspit. The funny thing is no-one reported them until I did, they were there for weeks. The council then came with a rubbish truck while they were away one morning and threw everything into it - their belongings, clothes, tents, the lot - and swept the place clean again. It was quite satisfying to watch.

oh cool, i'm a race thenI think so yes. I was suspended on here a few years ago for posting an Irish joke. When I queried it in the Forum Content Discussion section, I was told it was because an Irish joke is classed as an ethnic joke and is therefore racist. I was none the wiser and when I looked it up, I found out that other countries had their own versions of the same joke but aimed at a different country etc.
