Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.
so you just spam links with no comment of your own? awesome.
I wish they had compared it to SAM, would be interesting to see the comparison.
I think it's pretty clear what is and any comments I have about it are not important and people can make their own minds up about it after reading the review.
Well, if I was w1zzard I might feel miffed that TPU are not credited in the thread title though since the thread title is obviously too specific to apply to any other potential articles from other sites.I think it's pretty clear what is and any comments I have about it are not important and people can make their own minds up about it after reading the review.
I am hoping someone will do that. Most of the big tech YouTube channels have been pretty quiet on the whole thing.I wish they had compared it to SAM, would be interesting to see the comparison.
AndNo doubt this list will get longer, pushed forward by NVIDIA's excellent engineering team and developer
Are not words a neutral author would write.AMD just got lucky this time around because their RDNA2 cards were developed with PCIe Resizable BAR support in mind, which meant it didn't have to be added at a later time (remember RX 5600 XT BIOS updates?).
Yup.Having just read the article, is it just me or is w1zzard a major Nvidia fan?
Some of those 22 games don't even have Bar enabled because of Nvidia's whitelist yet they show similar performance increases anyway, probably due to natural variance rather than anything tangible.Just read review, half a frame at 4k on my god what a dissapointment.
Seems like it was overhyped big time.
Some games even have less frames with bar on in that review. lol what a load of trash/. Time for me to forget about the whole thing.
AMD also had to put in a lot of work (hardly luck) and it has taken Nvidia a long time to catch up and even then it's only in 17 games (instead of globally like AMD). It seems to be a pretty buggy implementation with some performance regressions despite the whitelist which was supposed to avoid them.Having just read the article, is it just me or is w1zzard a major Nvidia fan?
.
And
Are not words a neutral author would write.
Plus it's hardly luck since they specially designed RDNA2 with SAM in mind and hence didn't have to update any VBIOS's
Just read review, half a frame at 4k on my god what a dissapointment.
Seems like it was overhyped big time.
Some games even have less frames with bar on in that review. lol what a load of trash/. Time for me to forget about the whole thing.
so you just spam links with no comment of your own? awesome.
Just noticed that the review only had 16GB.It seems like one of those things that come downs to the hardware in the end, much like mantle back in the day.... as I noticed a massive difference in the low fps on cyberpunk with my 2600 and 3080 with re-size bar turned on. Shame that game doesn't have a built in benchmark.
Which makes me wonder if there wouldn't be more benefit is system RAM was a lot bigger than VRAM.Thermaltake TOUGHRAM, 16 GB DDR4
@ 4000 MHz 19-23-23-42 1T
Infinity Fabric @ 2000 MHz (1:1)
Update 7:30 pm CET:
You can use NVIDIA Profile Inspector to modify Resizable BAR game support settings. Credit goes to @chrcoluk.