No it will come to consoles too, i believe it won't have all the advanced graphics but it will be launched on Xbox and PS5.
-
Competitor rules
Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.
Resident Evil 8 performance
- Thread starter Grim5
- Start date
Doubt it, I will probably disable it. I'll let you know tomorrow.Hopefully this will get more games onboard with ray tracing now if amds fans herald ray tracing as the next best thing going by this
Haha the enhanced version performance compared with the older game perf: The only notable improvement is on AMD
Those benchmarks are with DLSS off - supposedly the 3070 gets 100fps indoors and 80fps outdoors on DLSS quality mode at 1440p. Game's out in 23 minutes so I'll check it out and confirm
Soldato
- Joined
- 25 Nov 2011
- Posts
- 20,679
- Location
- The KOP
Those benchmarks are with DLSS off - supposedly the 3070 gets 100fps indoors and 80fps outdoors on DLSS quality mode at 1440p. Game's out in 23 minutes so I'll check it out and confirm
Release date is Friday 7th isn't it?
The benchmarks directly above are for Metro Exodus Enhanced Edition (out today and free if you already have Metro Exodus).
Those benchmarks are with DLSS off - supposedly the 3070 gets 100fps indoors and 80fps outdoors on DLSS quality mode at 1440p. Game's out in 23 minutes so I'll check it out and confirm
Of course DLSS will improve fps for Nvidia cards but for benchmarking purposes and apples to apples comparisons the settings need to be exactly the same. What's interesting here is that only real improvement in performance is for AMD. It just shows that most existing RT games are designed for Nvidia cards and proper optimisation for RDNA2 can dramatically improve performance for the AMD gpu's.
I mean, sure, but according to that graph above we're seeing an improvement of 2.2fps for the 6800XT and it's *still* running at sub-60fps (on Ultra settings).
I will say that this chart doesn't seem to tally with the other one posted (are these 4k results?) but the game's out now (downloading!!!) people can run their own tests
Soldato
- Joined
- 25 Nov 2011
- Posts
- 20,679
- Location
- The KOP
These benchmarks show ( if they will be confirmed that AMD is much closer to Nvidia in RT performance and the huge gap we've seen in games like Control or CP 2077 is caused by the lack of optimization for AMD GPU. Some of us have said this from the beginning while others have kept saying that AMD can only do RT shadows.I mean, sure, but according to that graph above we're seeing an improvement of 2.2fps for the 6800XT and it's *still* running at sub-60fps (on Ultra settings).
I will say that this chart doesn't seem to tally with the other one posted (are these 4k results?) but the game's out now (downloading!!!) people can run their own tests
According to that graph there's a what? 16-18% performance difference between the 6800XT and the 3080 (and again, the 6800XT can't hit 60fps) - I'd say the gap is plenty..?
And it seems to match what Guru3D found for Hybrid-RT when they tested the 6800XT (although the 3D Mark full-path test gets much worse results for AMD).
And remember, this is a card that beats the 3080 in rasterization in a whole bunch of tests.
And it seems to match what Guru3D found for Hybrid-RT when they tested the 6800XT (although the 3D Mark full-path test gets much worse results for AMD).
And remember, this is a card that beats the 3080 in rasterization in a whole bunch of tests.
One thing is to have a 20-25% performance gap and another thing is to have a 50-100% performance gap. As i said it can be good news for the next gen of AMD cards.
So far we had proofs that the gap is not so big from games running only RT shadows. Now we see games running much more than shadows and still AMD cards are doing ok if we compare the results with those from other games like Control or CP2077. Which proves that the big gap we were seeing in Control, CP 2077 or 3D mark test, can be a problem of optimizing the software for the AMD cards.
No one said Big Navi can run RT games faster than Ampere, some of us questioned the results from Nvidia sponsored titles.
bUT DlsS is bLuRy and RuBBisHThose benchmarks are with DLSS off - supposedly the 3070 gets 100fps indoors and 80fps outdoors on DLSS quality mode at 1440p. Game's out in 23 minutes so I'll check it out and confirm
Soldato
- Joined
- 30 Jul 2012
- Posts
- 2,775
I assume the RT is at console level, looked mediocre.
Associate
- Joined
- 6 Dec 2013
- Posts
- 2,159
- Location
- Nottingham
and what settings are the consoles running at, have you actually tried it on max settings on pc? whilst there are a few better looking games it doesn't half look bad completely maxed
Caporegime
- Joined
- 8 Jul 2003
- Posts
- 30,063
- Location
- In a house
If thats about Metro, then yes, it is on AMDs console cards, if about Village, its console level RT on both AMD and Nvidia, as its an AMD game.
https://www.amd.com/en/support/kb/release-notes/rn-rad-win-21-5-1
"Up to 13% increase in performance in Resident Evil Village @ 4K MAX settings, with Radeon™ Software Adrenalin 21.5.1 on the 16GB Radeon™ RX 6800XT graphics card, versus the previous software driver edition 21.4.1."
"Up to 13% increase in performance in Resident Evil Village @ 4K MAX settings, with Radeon™ Software Adrenalin 21.5.1 on the 16GB Radeon™ RX 6800XT graphics card, versus the previous software driver edition 21.4.1."
Haha the enhanced version performance compared with the older game perf: The only notable improvement is on AMD
Post the link, and this is a village thread not metro. also those aren't even the max settings, there is an Extreme preset that should be used to benchmark
Last edited:
