I've not seen it back on VAR as I wasn't concentrating, but the replays without the lines looked level to me. It all comes back to the point of offside - is it to stop goalhanging, or to punish people whose feet are too large?
Edit: to be clear, compared to some of the other decisions this season it's probably offside. But the rule as a whole, and the application of VAR to it, is absurd
I've not seen it back on VAR as I wasn't concentrating, but the replays without the lines looked level to me. It all comes back to the point of offside - is it to stop goalhanging, or to punish people whose feet are too large?
We can have a debate about the wider issues of the offside rule another time but the law is what it is at the moment and relative to some of the decisions we've seen over the past 2 seasons, that wasn't massively close. There was clear daylight between the two lines, something that's not always been the case.
As unfortunate as it was for Chelsea, it would have been 10x more unfortunate for Leicester had the goal been given when he was offside.
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.