Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.
I still think we're far too early in the life of RT to worry about it, so I wouldn't spend extra for current-gen RT.
Maybe it'll be time in three or four generations.
Right now, zero.
In normal market times, zero.
They sell these cards to us and have to keep developing to make them worthwhile. Part of that is continuous improvement. We are not a charity.
Real time RT is in its infancy. Developers are barely making decent use of it. Even if you doubled the RT perf, it still isn't going to be mind-blowing up upgrade.
This. The terrible framrates of the marbles Demo (which I still think was using a limited lighting system) shows us that it isn't ready yet.I still think we're far too early in the life of RT to worry about it, so I wouldn't spend extra for current-gen RT.
Maybe it'll be time in three or four generations.
So you are getting your money's worth because you are using it for pro work. Not to be rude but I don't give a crap about CUDA or RT cores unless they are helping me in games. These are GeForce cards and marketed for gamers. Consumers generally don't care about paying their hard-earned money for a companies profit margin or R & D, they care for the best product they can get for the cheapest price. Companies are able to innovate and earn profits without having to rely on consumers' charity and those that cannot perish away and are replaced by better ones, generally.RT Cores allow me to put out work twice as fast as using Cuda.
And the new 30xx cards are twice as fast as the old 20xx
So old cuda, vs new RT, is saving me 3 hours out of every 4 (at least).
Worth the money, for sure (at MSRP).
And AMD is currently not worth it, as they run slower than the 20xx series cards for more money, even at MSRP.
(Fully admitting that, as this isn't a gaming workload, my use case is not the 'norm' so YMMV)
I still think we're far too early in the life of RT to worry about it, so I wouldn't spend extra for current-gen RT.
Maybe it'll be time in three or four generations.
Agree with these two gents. Ray Tracing is still a big fat nothing burger. 95% of gamers don’t care about it and don’t use it.Right now, zero.
In normal market times, zero.
They sell these cards to us and have to keep developing to make them worthwhile. Part of that is continuous improvement. We are not a charity.
Real time RT is in its infancy. Developers are barely making decent use of it. Even if you doubled the RT perf, it still isn't going to be mind-blowing up upgrade.
We all know Nvidia currently has the lead on raytracing and other bonus features like DLSS but how much extra would you spend on an Nvidia GPU for these features over an AMD GPU with equal rasterisation?.
No I'm just interested in how much value people put on RT and DLSS.is this whole thread to justify your own purchase ?