Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.
Ray tracing, I really struggle to see a difference in the fidelity but even if I could the frame rate hit is too much for me to turn it on.
DLSS seems like a decent feature and although I only used it for black OPS for a couple of hours it seemed like free performance to my eyes. Hoping AMDs version turns out to be decent.
Nothing, I wanted an AMD card but couldn't get one at MSRP. Eventually ended up with a 3080.
So far have barely used DLSS or RT. I expect I will at some point but next year or two at least neither is a must have for me.
They already are, 6700xt retests with newer drivers are puzhing it closer to a 3070You're in the minority there TBH it's usually the other way around this gen from what I've seen. Lots of people went AMD because they couldn't get an Nvidia card. I do wonder If fine wine will strike again and the AMD cards will end up being better performers long term though.
Its always on a game to game basis. Cyberpunk is the big one though. All the ray tracing settings on in that game and its night and day.
Agree with this - taking a 50% FPS hit to turn RT on was worth it for me... but I don't think I would have spent 50% more on a card to maintain the FPS (if that makes sense?). Maybe 10-20% extra at most (so I guess similar to the £100-£150 others have posted)
Could always play at 1080p upscaled to 4k...
You're in the minority there TBH it's usually the other way around this gen from what I've seen. Lots of people went AMD because they couldn't get an Nvidia card. I do wonder If fine wine will strike again and the AMD cards will end up being better performers long term though.
Dlss quality is 1440p upscaledNo thanks, I wanted better image quality, not worse!