MINI convertible advice

Soldato
Joined
2 Nov 2013
Posts
4,407
The Mrs has an Audi S4 cabrio, but it's getting rather long in the tooth (2004)and we're thinking of replacing. She doesn't use the size of it at all, so I'm thinking a MINI convertible might be a good idea for a replacement. She's not that bothered about speed, but I'm concerned that going too much slower will make it seem rather sluggish, relatively speaking. So I think we're looking at a Cooper S at least. Maybe a JCW if we can find one.

So, at the risk of being told we should be buying a BMW 3 series, any advice on these cars? We're probably looking in the 10-15k region.

I've heard some conflicting advice - to avoid the 2nd generation 1.6 as a problematic engine (and therefore aim for 3rd gen where they used a 2.0), or others saying as long as it's a late 1.6 it's fine.

This becomes important if we do consider getting a JCW, because the premium would likely mean we're looking at late 1.6 version. But if the extras (and perhaps how well it keeps value?) are worth it...

Mind you, the S4 she's kept for 8 years. So generally speaking depreciation isn't a big consideration.
 
I’ve got a 2016 JCW cabrio. It is a lot of fun, especially in sport mode with the exhaust doing it’s thing. Childish but the noise helps give the illusion of a car quicker than it is, especially with the roof down. For reference I’ve owned a Z4M roadster and I enjoy driving the mini just as much. It’s reasonably equipped but is not quite as well put together as I remember the BMW was. The ride leaves a bit to be desired in my opinion but that can be sorted I’m told with replacement of the runflats which I’ll do when they wear down a bit more. If tuning is your thing then they seem to respond well but I don’t have personal experience.

There’s plenty of torque on offer and I think the engine feels much like a bigger engine from older cars (although maybe that’s true for all modern turbos) I haven’t really got experience of anything that recent, but I’ve often had big lazy engined cars - CL500, 330Ci, Hemi Jeep and the JCW doesn’t feel wanting, albeit it’s obviously in a much lighter car. I imagine if you’re used to an S4 it won’t be a big disappointment. This is probably also why it isn’t the best hot hatch. Noise aside, the power delivery isn’t as furious as you’d want from a hot hatch I suspect. Oh and the brakes are really good!
 
This becomes important if we do consider getting a JCW, because the premium would likely mean we're looking at late 1.6 version. But if the extras (and perhaps how well it keeps value?) are worth it..

I don't think they are. There is nothing that would convince me to get the previous gen Mini now - even the extra power of the JCW. It was an ok car in its day but its day has long passed and the current model (Itself dating from 2014) is considerably better. So, make sure its a 2 litre, it is a much better car.
 
Good god my wife’s mini is slow. Put foot down, nothing happens. The JCW is horrendously overpriced for what you get. She’s obsessed with them though, much preferred it to her TT.
 
I’ve got a Smart Fortwo 0.9 turbo convertible, it’s a city car so not fast. It’s all I need really for driving round a small island like Jersey where the max speed limit on some roads is 40mph. That said we still have our fair share of rich Ferrari and Porsche owners.
 
100% go for the 3rd gen, later n18 2nd gens are more reliable than the n14's, but as Fox said, the 2nd gen is so outdated now compared to the 3rd gen, if you can afford gen its a better car all round
 
My wife likes big cars. I got her a A4 sline. She loved it. Then she wanted a 3 series.

Both cars about 10 years old. Audi all the way. It's just better looking and the wife will be happy.

If she likes big "man" cars, she won't like a mini
 
I've been running a 16 plate manual JCW hatch for the past 3 years, can't really comment on the convertible specifics but the 2.0 has been absolutely solid and is a really flexible engine.

Mines been custom mapped to 280hp/400nm, with most of the gains higher up the rev-range which makes it more rewarding to rev out (the stock map feels like it's very artificially limited above 4000rpm) and I've replaced the runflats with non-runflats; which massively improved the ride quality, road noise and handling. It feels like it squats down/bites a little more under acceleration and cornering than before.

I've not encountered any issues so far at all, and by all accounts the current shape (F56) is significantly more reliable than it's predecessor.
 
Back
Top Bottom