• Competitor rules

    Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.

Pcie 4.0 worth a new motherboard?

Permabanned
Joined
30 Dec 2021
Posts
3,642
Location
Yorkshire
My new gpu supports pcie 4.0 but my b450 is 3.0 only, are the benefits of 4.0 worth the cost of a new board and a day rebuilding my pc
 
Not really. Better benefit for PCI 4.0 SSDs but down to personal preference whether its worth it for you or not.
I am running a 3080Ti on PCI-E 3.0 and it runs great.
 
You might have heard this about the 6500 XT, that card does need PCI-E 4.0, but the 6600 XT is mostly fine.

i dont understand what you mean? i asked is there is perfectam benafits from pcie 4.0, i know it works with 3.0 because its working.
 
i dont understand what you mean? i asked is there is perfectam benafits from pcie 4.0, i know it works with 3.0 because its working.

I mean, with the 6500 XT there are huge performance benefits with pci-e 4.0 vs 3.0, but with a 6600 xt generally no, 3 is fine, except in a few cases.
 

The one advantage of PCIE 4 vs 3, is SAM in games that it benefits from (and in some titles, better lower fps)
 
Last edited:
i dont understand what you mean? i asked is there is perfectam benafits from pcie 4.0, i know it works with 3.0 because its working.

Main reason is because the 6500 only uses 4 PCIe lanes while the 6600 uses 8. So for the 6500 since it uses so little lanes there's a good benefit jumping to PCIe 4.0, but for the 6600 8 lanes at 3.0 is enough.
 
I didn’t know that had reduced lanes, I do know 8 pcie lanes is all that’s need to run a gpu at full speed. I remember having this conversation when thinking of running my old 280x in cross fire

x8 still up to the job after all the years?
wiild the 6900 be ok at 3.0 x8?
 
mad this been done as a way to cap performance than? Or is there a different reason.
I know the 5xxx line up was all very close in performance and had to be bios capped on OC

Most likely "cost saving" reasons. But for the 6500, it's a laptop part that's been overclocked to fit for desktops, hence why it has so little lanes. Silicon shortage meant AMD couldn't dedicate a proper new die design for it and was easier to reuse an existing one.
 
I think its safe to say if you already have a B450 then theres no reason to change it for now , there might be a small improvement in minimums in games but at what overall cost to buy that. Thank you @CuriousTomCat , as the biggest advatage of a B550 over a B450 would be sam; just enable it in bios. What board do you have OP - pretty sure all B450 boards have a 16x slot ?
 
I’m running a MSI B450M MAX MORTAR.

tbf I was getting 130 fps in battlefield last night, so I feel it’s safe to say I’m happy.
 
Back
Top Bottom