Vantage vs MGT

Soldato
Joined
26 Jul 2004
Posts
3,411
Location
Thunderdome
In a fit of YOLO I (with a slightly heavy heart) said goodbye to my M5 at the weekend. It was a lovely car but didn’t really get my blood flowing at anything under 7/10ths, which was too fast for my license to be comfortable. A gorgeous colour (San Marino Blue), it will be missed.

So I decided as I am in a good place atm (and not getting any younger) I want a bit more drama and should move into my more dream car/bucket list territory. I’ve decided to move past my 911 hankering (too sensible) and go with a more emotional choice. I currently have a deposit on a late, very low mileage manual AM Vantage V8.

Always wanted an AM, particularly a Vantage, but always felt it was out of reach in a ‘sensible people don’t drive Astons’ way. The Vantage seems more GT car than sports car which suits me and obviously looks and sounds amazing. Subject to a test drive, the deal is done… or so I thought.

Ive always had a nonsensical, passionate desire to own a Maserati. I don’t really understand where this comes from, my dad (a big car nut influence in my formative years) never had one, nor held desire to. I loved the look of the early 90s Ghilbis and of course the 3200’s boomerang lights. However in later years, faced with opportunities to buy a 4200 and then a Grandsport, I (both times) talked myself into buying more sensible cars (E36 M3 & E39 M5). It was mostly down to quality fears, poor reliability and dashboard removals to replace dead AC units (a matter of when not if).

These days I feel the concerns of quality and reliability have much improved at Maser over the years and I really feel a late GrandTurismo with the ZF gearbox would be a lovely car to own/drive. I’ve always been drawn to the GT since they came out years ago; its sculptured look and incredible Ferrari-sounding V8. Being a 4 seater its more practical than the Vantage (if it was needed), but I guess that’s more of a nice to have. The practicality aspect is probably what makes it appeal to my more sensible nature and why I’ve hit this unexpected fork in the road.

I know there’s a few AM owners here, but I don’t know if there are any Maser owners. Thoughts and experiences welcome. So come on motors, which car do we think is better put together (quality-wise) and which is more likely to either breakdown leaving me stranded and/or require more trips to the garage?

Note - either purchase would be a late, low mileage, approved used example and come with an extended manufacture’s warranty. Let’s also assume both cars cost the same (or near enough) to purchase. There’s also no need to get bogged down on my finances etc. This car will be do around 2-3k miles a year, covering a mixture of town and country driving and will continue to be serviced at the respected main dealers with warranty extensions in place. Thanks
 
What is your budget? Late, low mileage Maserati Granturismo examples at main dealers seem to be about £70-80k or so. That's either loads of money for an older gen Vantage that doesn't have a V12 - or not really going to get you an equivalent new Vantage in a good spec.

FWIW, the new Vantage is an excellent thing let down by the infotainment setup which dates the car massively IMO. I loved the way the car felt so totally dominated by the engine. I can't personally see the appeal of the Maserati over the AM (although I've not driven one). They always seem a bit uninspiring/old man/meh to me whenever I see one on the road.
 
What is your budget? Late, low mileage Maserati Granturismo examples at main dealers seem to be about £70-80k or so. That's either loads of money for an older gen Vantage that doesn't have a V12 - or not really going to get you an equivalent new Vantage in a good spec.

FWIW, the new Vantage is an excellent thing let down by the infotainment setup which dates the car massively IMO. I loved the way the car felt so totally dominated by the engine. I can't personally see the appeal of the Maserati over the AM (although I've not driven one). They always seem a bit uninspiring/old man/meh to me whenever I see one on the road.
Sorry, in my ramblings I should have been more specific - I’m looking at the prev gen Vantage. I’ve no emotional connection to the new one, so not looking at that.

Indeed, I can’t think of any tangible reasons for Maser ownership in general, other than the link to Ferrari. But if you want one of those, better to buy one I guess. All my adult life I’ve bought cars with a mostly semi-sensible head on, that might explain my near constant changing. Going to try it a different way this time.

You should approve of this particular Aston actually, time will reveal all ;)
 
I am equally as split as you. I've always fancied the MGT and having a Ferrari engine but for the same money, I would have to go with an older v12 AM. Just cause its a) an AM and b) a V12.
 
GranTurismos are rather large aren't they? They've never done anything for me, but horses for courses.
Is a V12 Vantage in budget? One of those would be epic.
 
Both will throw big bills at you at regular intervals, but if I had to pick it would be V12 Vantage > V8 Vantage Roadster > Maser. The Maser noise is epic but they're properly large wafters. I'd take a 911 over both V8s.
 
The Maser is much bigger granted, but the Vantage (this Vantage) isn’t a hardcore sport cars either. Either will fit into my lifestyle but the Aston will be more involving.

I could go to the V12, but I do like the balance of the V8. The 12 is more hardcore and as such is a different proposition for me. Also that price range would open up other options and then I start worrying about residuals and the value I will get out of it. At this stage the V8 seems the right fit, I can always move up if living with an Aston works for me longterm.
 
Is there value for money to be found in going for a later one? An early 4.7 and a late one are essentially the same but there's a fair difference in purchase price! I definitely understand the appeal of buying a main dealer car with warranty etc but ultimately is the £20k difference going to be money well spent? £20k buys a lot of work at Bamford Rose et al...
 
It’s a really good point and one I’ve been agonising over. I think if I lived closer to Bamford Rose, I’d be more inclined to take a gamble on a non main dealer car. Sadly I’m the other end of the country and will need to rely on a main dealer for the routine stuff at least.

All in all I think the one I’m looking at has all my boxes ticked (condition, SH, spec, uniqueness, the deal etc). I guess there’s also a lot of peace of mind in there too, being somewhat risk adverse and completely new to this marque from an ownership perspective. I’ll keep looking at other cars and weighing up my options, but I’m not exactly pushing the boat out on this one and so atm the deal feels quite comfortable.

I’m guessing you will have gone through a similar process with your Mc, there’s always cheaper cars right?

Edit - was hoping some of the existing owners might chip in with their experiences, might help illuminate areas I haven’t thought of yet.
 
From the outset my McLaren intentions were only ever main dealer just because you absolutely need a dealer relationship to enjoy owning one. I'm not sure AM ownership is quite the same in that respect - sure, large bills are possible but there's enough cars out there and there's plenty of them so support is plentiful beyond the main dealer network. There are a few AMV8 owners on here though, @Gibbo has one as does @NickXX and I'm sure there are more I can't name :)
 
From the outset my McLaren intentions were only ever main dealer just because you absolutely need a dealer relationship to enjoy owning one. I'm not sure AM ownership is quite the same in that respect - sure, large bills are possible but there's enough cars out there and there's plenty of them so support is plentiful beyond the main dealer network. There are a few AMV8 owners on here though, @Gibbo has one as does @NickXX and I'm sure there are more I can't name :)

You’re right, it’s definitely a different prospect at the level I’m looking at.

It's hard to say much without knowing the budget you're aiming for. I tend to agree with DRZ in that I'd trend to an older Vantage within reason, there may be some other specialists near you.

Maybe watch some of these https://www.youtube.com/user/BamfordRose/search?query=warranty

I didn’t really set a budget, I just looked at the latter cars for both marques from franchised dealers with warranty. The youngest cars generally seem to top out in the low 70s for both.

Thanks yes I’ve been going through the Bamford Rose videos of an evening. Including the one where he names the reputable dealers/specialists. Food for thought certainly.
 
My boss was looking for the perfect Vantage and ended up getting a DBS, if you hadn't considered that.
 
I have a V8 Vantage and colleague has a GT. Both amazing cars with equally amazing, if very different sounding engines.

Firstly it comes down to the size of car you want/are willing to accept, the GT is huge compared to my Vantage. Think about that and go from there.
 
Good to hear from a current owner. On the size front I’m easy either way; no requirements to carry more than 1 other person and as we have another car, 95% of the time it’s just me.

The rear seats in the GT would largely go unused, family outings are done in the wife’s car and I even have access to another couple of cars if for some reason her car was out of action. It’s this level of flexibility that opens me up to the opportunity of going back to two seats.
 
As much as I love the Granturismo it needs to be remembered the original car was released in 2007 and while it has received updates and a new 4.7L V8, and still sounds absolutely epic, it is also woefully short when it comes to technology, especially compared to something like a new Mercedes or even an Aston. Beautiful cars though, I'd absolutely test drive one but I'd find it very difficult to justify a nearly new one at even £60k+ when fundamentally it's a 15 year old design with refreshes every few years.
 
Back
Top Bottom