Ukraine isn't about to waste missiles that it would likely no longer get as a result by using it on soft targets of zero military value. Now if Russia happens to be using towns as a shield for their own ballistic and MLR systems then it becomes questionable, but justifiable if not attacking risks Ukraine's defence.
Well it was said here in these forums plenty of times.
Its been posted several times, even as far as around a week or two ago, I've never seen you question these ridiculous claims people keep making. You make it sound in your post as if you aren't that stupid to fall for it yet you become very silent when the posts are made.
Which part of what I post is Russian propaganda ? give me a link to some Russian(propaganda) site and then tell me which part I have copied. In English btw as calling me comrade weirdly doesn't improve my Russian.
Do you prefer the term Sympathetiser?
No comrade is just fine.
No, because you're mixing up artillery with long range cruise missiles. Nobody I've seen has suggested they're about to run out of artillery shells, unless their supply lines are cut. Running short on cruise missiles? Yes, absolutely. The sanctions imposed will see their production reduced too. That's why they've used them sparingly and we've not seen 100's of them raining down on targets every night. It's not even a slight on the Russians or their capabilities tbh, even the yanks almost exhausted their supplies in the ME. It's the primary drawback of such weapons, you'll never produce them faster than they're used. It's also why they've spent so much money researching rail guns and the like. Much less $/shot, can store much more of them and no danger of ammo cook off if hit.
Good question, I think countries need a permit from Germany if plan to export weapons of German origin.
I bit far way for Russia at this time.
.
