Associate
- Joined
- 7 Sep 2020
- Posts
- 107
CPU: i5-9600KF @ ALFII 420, OC removed for testing
mobo: Aorus z690 Pro, so solid value board / bottom of the high end
mem: Ripjaws V DDR4/3000MHz/CL14 (2x8GB)
storage: SSD/NVM/PCIE3 (CS3030)
PSU: Corsair RM750 (the yellow-sticker one)
case: Enthoo Pro
fans: four P14 @ 1000 rpm intake, four P14 exhaust (3 from the AIO, top-mounted @ push @ PWM, and 1 sysfan @ 1000 rpm)
The TUF still manages to heat up to 75C GPu / 85–90C hotspot in a single benchmark run, marginally cooler in games.
Performance is a bit meh. It's within range for a 3070 but below the average score of a FE. TimeSpy says I'm below average for this CPU+GPU combination. In Kingdom Come: Deliverance the game feels smoother than with my (now-dead) 1070ti, but I see bigger fps dps than with the 1070ti in Rattay. I now see lot more <40 fps moments than I did with the 1070ti. The 1070ti had been heavily OC'd, boosting at >2200 and all, but a 3070 should still be much stronger than a full 1080 and still noticeably stronger than a 1080ti.
The card worked in a data centre for 1.5 years, and it's already a replacement. The first one was so loud and hot that the company owner apologized and sent me a personally tested unit, which is this unit. Less loud and marginally less hot than its brother but still not what I'd expected from a TUF given its stellar reviews, like TechPowerUp's.
So, am I being a princess or is something off? I'm leaving on a holiday in a couple of days, so I wonder if I should keep the card, swap the paste and pads when I return, or return it right now just to be on the safe side before my 14 days run out.
If this came from a gamer or designer, I'd be inclined to take the risk and just swap the paste, but after 1.5 years in a data centre perhaps the card might be damage? I have no information as to whether that was 8 hours a day or 24/7/365 for 1.5 years, but still… 1.5 years isn't an awful lot of time. Shouldn't really be enough to suffer discernible degradation.
mobo: Aorus z690 Pro, so solid value board / bottom of the high end
mem: Ripjaws V DDR4/3000MHz/CL14 (2x8GB)
storage: SSD/NVM/PCIE3 (CS3030)
PSU: Corsair RM750 (the yellow-sticker one)
case: Enthoo Pro
fans: four P14 @ 1000 rpm intake, four P14 exhaust (3 from the AIO, top-mounted @ push @ PWM, and 1 sysfan @ 1000 rpm)
The TUF still manages to heat up to 75C GPu / 85–90C hotspot in a single benchmark run, marginally cooler in games.
Performance is a bit meh. It's within range for a 3070 but below the average score of a FE. TimeSpy says I'm below average for this CPU+GPU combination. In Kingdom Come: Deliverance the game feels smoother than with my (now-dead) 1070ti, but I see bigger fps dps than with the 1070ti in Rattay. I now see lot more <40 fps moments than I did with the 1070ti. The 1070ti had been heavily OC'd, boosting at >2200 and all, but a 3070 should still be much stronger than a full 1080 and still noticeably stronger than a 1080ti.
The card worked in a data centre for 1.5 years, and it's already a replacement. The first one was so loud and hot that the company owner apologized and sent me a personally tested unit, which is this unit. Less loud and marginally less hot than its brother but still not what I'd expected from a TUF given its stellar reviews, like TechPowerUp's.
So, am I being a princess or is something off? I'm leaving on a holiday in a couple of days, so I wonder if I should keep the card, swap the paste and pads when I return, or return it right now just to be on the safe side before my 14 days run out.
If this came from a gamer or designer, I'd be inclined to take the risk and just swap the paste, but after 1.5 years in a data centre perhaps the card might be damage? I have no information as to whether that was 8 hours a day or 24/7/365 for 1.5 years, but still… 1.5 years isn't an awful lot of time. Shouldn't really be enough to suffer discernible degradation.