• Competitor rules

    Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.

3090Ti FE still ok?

I think you meant to quote me? But yes, not sure how, could be length of registered forum time? 20th year next year :)

I generally do not post much as you can see.

Quality over quantity ;)
 
I think you meant to quote me? But yes, not sure how, could be length of registered forum time? 20th year next year :)

I generally do not post much as you can see.

Quality over quantity ;)

I did indeed intend to quote you.
Appreciate the quality over quantity statement!

20 years is no mean feat, you’re almost part of the furniture at this point. :)
 
6900XT.


Save yourself £300-£400, unless you're an Nvidian cultist of course, in which case you enjoy being bent over with your trousers round your ankles way too much to buy AMD!

;)
 
6900XT.


Save yourself £300-£400, unless you're an Nvidian cultist of course, in which case you enjoy being bent over with your trousers round your ankles way too much to buy AMD!

;)
Or use Cuda, want RT performance, DLSS, PhysX, NVENC.

But yes also a cultist who licks voodoo dolls.
 
If you can get the 3090 Ti FE for less than $800 it's worth it. It's not like the card is suddenly slow.

The only 4000 series card worth spending money for is the 4090. (of course the Ti version will be the full uncut die, will cost too much and will only come out when Lisa Su makes a threat to compete). Basically $100 more MSRP than the 3090 was, with what seems like between 60-70% better rasterization performance (we don't care about the Gigaflops or Cuda cores, we care about end performance in rasterization and a second category in ray-tracing/path traced performance.
 
Back
Top Bottom