Regardless of any injury, Ramsey would not have played much, if at all, this season. Klopp was always going to use Gomez and Milner as back-up for Trent in the short-term, in the League and CL anyway. Heck, even Williams couldn't get a game ahead of those two.
Williams was definitely ahead of Gomez and Milner at right back last season. Gomez didn't start at RB until April, long after Williams was gone. Milner did only once (and since then Williams started whenever TAA didn't until he left).
However I'd argue if Ramsay is not good enough to play ahead of Gomez and Milner right now, then Williams is yet another player that we sold without getting a proper replacement and yet another self-inflicted squad depth problem.
He could well have had a good game, I can't remember it too well personally outside of Thiago's cracking strike, neither can you by the look of it. But your original statement "he had Diaz in his pocket" when the player in question produced multiple opportunities for his team isn't a true statement is it? Especially when you look at write-ups of the game from various media publications and all of them state he struggled with Diaz.
Oh so you're taking back your claim that he was ridiculed then? Because that's what started all of this
Also in the interest of announcing exaggerations, Diaz-in-the-pocket comment was also exaggeration, Williams was excellent in that match though as scores indicate and I'm sure you'd agree.
Ahh, apologies that was hyperbole as I assumed that was what we were doing after your claim that Neco's the 2nd coming of Dani Alves (just for clarification that's me exaggerating), the point was that Nat Phillips had the odd decent game and yet he is what he is, a 5th choice CB that would do better moving to either a championship club or a mid to bottom of the league club where he can play as that's his level. Which is exactly the same as Neco William's level, a bit too good to be backup but nowhere near the required level to play for us regularly. Luckily NF were throwing around silly money and offered us 17million quid for him, a cracking bit of business.
Williams got very good ratings when he played last season, be it for Liverpool, Fulham or Wales. Certainly not a one-game wonder as you're portraying him to be, that's unfair to the lad.
And I said selling him was good business, the problem was that our replacement strategy meant we'll be missing a RB cover for months at the very least and after that we're left with a player that is at an even earlier level in his development
Controversial opinion: Dani Alves was overrated. Attack me
He was 19 for a start, not 17

and the only time he was in and around the senior squad he starts to pick up little niggly injuries - considering you were having a little whinge about injuries I think that's quite pertinent don't you?
Technically 18, neither 17 nor 19
I admit I do have a problem with players that take a place our squad and on paper are offering depth but in reality are rarely ready to play when called upon
No, I'm just tired of people like yourself that's all doom and gloom claiming ex-players are something more than they are.
I'm also annoyed by the everything-is-fine-as-is crew who think it's their mission to attack anyone who might have any criticisms or think differently about the management's decision making. Being critical is not doom and gloom, you critique because you want something better. I want trophies, the way we've conducted ourselves this season (from FSG all the way to players) isn't how we win trophies.
Also, you're ignoring when I praise our players, last page for example. So maybe this doom and gloom is something you're searching for in everyone's comments. Something to consider.
You haven't corrected any record.
Oh so you didn't claim he was ridiculed when he wasn't, didn't claim he only played 2 games this season when he played all 12, right
You live in your fantasy world, I give up.