I would have banned that plane kid too, by the way.
You'd have banned someone for sharing public information?
Glory to Twitterotzka!The new "Town Hall" where you can't even share legal, publicly available information with each other.
So he banned the guy, banned the account tracking his plane, banned the account tracking the Russian oligarchs but you know what didn't get banned...
Guess Bill just wasn't on Elons priority list![]()
Loads of people are biased against Musk - unfortunately the last couple of years or so he seems intent on proving any and everyone who ever might have had a criticism of him, validly or otherwise, right.
There are loads of people who hate him out of hand, including a few posters in the threads here, out of jealousy or their ego being challenged by the fact he even exists though they'd never admit it.
Same with the guy from the cave rescue, though the media has warped a lot of people's perceptions of the story by getting the wrong end of the stick and never correcting the record, he acted out of his own bias against Musk rather than the actual situation and sadly got a rise out of Musk turning the whole situation into a sordid affair.
Wait, so he is taking legal action against the guy too?
![]()
Elon Musk taking legal action over Twitter account that tracks his private jet
Twitter's owner says an account tracking his private jet has put his son's safety at risk.www.bbc.co.uk
The Twitter Files have been billed as a major exposé of left-wing Twitter censorship. Musk, whose $44 billion acquisition of Twitter was ostensibly motivated by grievances against such speech-policing—and, in a larger context, by his spats with progressive journalists—has presided over the release of selections from internal documents made available to three writers on Substack: Matt Taibbi, a left-wing gadfly reporter; Bari Weiss, a center-right former New York Times staff editor; and Michael Shellenberger, a maverick environmental advocate and two-time California gubernatorial candidate.
(There was a flurry of amusement when the Washington Post referred to Weiss and Taibbi as “conservative journalists,” then removed the label in an update without specifying what the update was. The label is certainly inaccurate, but it’s fair to say that all three writers belong to a political subculture oppositional to the progressive consensus.)
But do these “files”—screenshots of Slack messages and other documents showing how decisions were made to remove tweets, suspend accounts, or limit the visibility of some posts and users—show nefarious political suppression of free speech or legitimate and even necessary moderation?
Broadly, the reactions are divided into two camps: those who believe the revelations are a major scandal vindicating the worst conservative/populist accusations against “Big Tech,” and those who believe that the revelations are a “nothingburger” dressed up to look like a major scandal.
Let’s call them Team Scandal and Team Nothingburger.
The Tesla truck is coming (one day). It could all be a genius plan to align himself with the inbred hillbillies, so they buy his trucks.