- Z4 - BMW tax, so potentially huge maintenance costs?
If you're worried about the running costs of an SLK or Z4, I think an MX5 probably makes the most sense.
I'd guess the SLK and Z4 are £1000 just for a set of tyres, as an example.
The OP said in their 1st post fuel costs isn't a concern. They said they wanted a convertible for upto 18k but not an SL or Jag. An E93 M3 is reliable so maintenance costs won't be very high, the only things to make sure they've been done is rod bearings and throttle actuators.How did we get to Porsche 911, Mercedes SL55 and V8 Powered M3 Convertibles in a thread where he started off expressing worry about the costs of running a 2 litre BMW and saying a Mercedes SLK was out of the question!?
the 36 and 46 are fantastic cars and in x years time you'll get back more than what you paid for it no doubt, what put me off them when i was looking recently is they're at the age when rust starts to become a problem imo. i think the E9x values will start rising as it's the last NA M3, that V8 4.0 is a fantastic engine.Yeh but who wants an E9x when an E46 or E36 are also available?
An E93 M3 is reliable so maintenance costs won't be very high
Fair play i see your point now, OP is worried about running a Z4 so an M3 would not make sense.Keeping an old M3 on the road is not a cheap thing to be doing. The concern over running something like that is much more justified than something like a Z4.
That's really my concern, I don't intend to run the replacement on a shoe string budget but that means being aware of potential huge bills too.Most of the cars in this thread won't be too expensive to run... Until something significant needs repairing - suspension, engine etc. Even things like brake discs could be vastly more expensive if they're bespoke. The Porsche, M3, TVR etc WILL cost significantly more than something like an MX5 in parts and labour costs.
If you don't go into this with your eyes open, you could end up with a car you can't afford to repair, which is worthless to sell on.
If the Z4 is in the same ball park servicing costs as an S2000 then it's something I can research further. However I really can't imagine that the servicing costs on something like the advert below will be anything like servicing a 2.0L 4-pot:It will be materially more expensive than a Z4, a car they are already concerned about the costs of running and which is effectively just an ordinary BMW not an M Power car.
Keeping an old M3 on the road is not a cheap thing to be doing. The concern over running something like that is much more justified than something like a Z4.
I have never really taken an interest in all things BMW, but a quick look online suggests the S54 can have some eye watering repair costs and a car 16+ years old will need ongoing maintenance.https://www.ebay.co.uk/itm/33491308...uid=F8HQReA4Q2C&widget_ver=artemis&media=COPY
Aside from maintenance, you should get your money back and more when you sell it on.

Hard to beat either in terms of smiles/£Otherwise maybe a Mini JCW or Abarth 595 for something with a go kart vibe, although the latter isn’t really a convertible In the truest sense.