Bethesda do tend to release an optional texture pack...I hope Starfield uses up all 24gb of my Vram, i want to use what i paid for.
We know how optional texture packs go...
-
Competitor rules
Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.
Just what is NVIDIA up to?
- Thread starter SpellowHouse
- Start date
We know how optional texture packs go...
The same Steve you were claiming earlier in this thread had an Nvidia bias? That Steve?
Yes, my mate Steve
These things are added value, what they are doing is selling an RT and DLSS eco system, the hardware is less important.
Added value or not if you want people to use your tech you sell it as cheap as possible and make back your money in other ways or later down the road, consoles learnt that decades ago.
I hope Starfield uses up all 24gb of my Vram, i want to use what i paid for
So do i, render all these 30 and 40 series GPU's unusable, "YOU BOUGHT THE WRONG GPU, DO YOU HERE ME? THAT'S THE WRONG GPU"
Lol..... NO!!!!!
DLSS is everything, Nvidia are now DLSS, pay your DLSS tax, the more you buy the more you DLSS, WOOOSH....... i am the sound effect.@LtMatt, you've upset Stanners. What did you do?
It was quite funny haha, i glimpsed it before it got redacted
You'd almost thing that playing TSMC for fools with the threat to move more stuff to Samsung misfired.
Guess the genius-level CEO JHH isn't always that clever unless he was playing 5D chess?
Last edited:
Soldato
- Joined
- 14 Aug 2009
- Posts
- 3,470
And at very least a 8c/16t with vcache CPU, 32gb ram plus gen 3 nvme 3.5gb/s.I hope Starfield uses up all 24gb of my Vram, i want to use what i paid for
Go all in, I'd say.
)I hope Starfield uses up all 24gb of my Vram, i want to use what i paid for
Probably will. But will also fine on my 3080 Ti
Caporegime
- Joined
- 9 Nov 2009
- Posts
- 25,776
- Location
- Planet Earth
And at very least a 8c/16t with vcache CPU, 32gb ram plus gen 3 nvme 3.5gb/s.
Go all in, I'd say.
Fallout 4 already performs the best on the 3D V-Cache CPUs,and as a game prefers SSDs. If its heavily modded,I found it unplayable on an HDD.
Or products they have are just not good enough. And drivers need a lot more work.
Last edited:
Soldato
- Joined
- 14 Aug 2009
- Posts
- 3,470
Most likely the vcache compensates for RAM as that scaled pretty well with that. With HDD was bad for loading times.
Anyway, we'll see how it goes
)
Manage to get a deal on 4070 and help of decent pound results in £529 for a RTX 4070, slim margin wise so don't expect us to hold the price for too long:
www.overclockers.co.uk
www.overclockers.co.uk
Gainward GeForce RTX 4070 Ghost 12GB GDDR6X PCI-Express Graphics Card
Order Gainward GeForce RTX 4070 Ghost 12GB GDDR6X PCI-Express Graphics Card now online and benefit from fast delivery.
www.overclockers.co.uk
Gainward GeForce RTX 4090 Phantom 24GB GDDR6X PCI-Express Graphics Card
Order Gainward GeForce RTX 4090 Phantom 24GB GDDR6X PCI-Express Graphics Card now online and benefit from fast delivery.
www.overclockers.co.uk
Last edited:
You're both right and wrong, it's been *ages since i looked into it but last time i looked AMD does more on the GPU itself so are technically 'better' and Nvidia offload more of the work of the GPU into software so technically have 'better' software. There's arguments for and against doing more of the work on the GPU vs doing more of it before it gets to the GPU, ultimately it's all 'software' whether it's running at the driver or at the hardware level.
*maybe more than a decade ago so could be outdated by now but IIRC AMD used to have scheduler work queues at the hardware level whereas Nvidia scheduled work before it was sent to the GPU so had to come up with some niffy workarounds to reorganise those queues because when VR became popular again certain jobs (like an update after head movement) had to take priority to reduce VR nausea.
Still an bad deal compared with the 6800XT's you've got for £499 though (let alone the 6950XT for £599).
Im not so sure that nvidia are offloading ray tracing to software. Its done in hardware. Nvidia have superior hardware hence why performance is better as well as better efficiency.
Unless my understanding of efficiency is wrong and amd using more power and giving less performance means its more efficient?
Please elaborate
I think Murphy is referring to the scheduler - AMD GPUs have a hardware scheduler, Nvidia implements it through their drivers/software - it's supposedly why Nvidia's drivers require more CPU resources than AMD's do.
Nvidia Has a Driver Overhead Problem, GeForce vs Radeon on Low-End CPUs
Support us on Patreon: https://www.patreon.com/hardwareunboxedJoin us on Floatplane: https://www.floatplane.com/channel/HardwareUnboxedBuy relevant products ...
www.youtube.com
Last edited:
Well looks like nvidias performance crown wont ever be toppled:
www.techpowerup.com
2 grand high end incoming
AMD Retreating from Enthusiast Graphics Segment with RDNA4?
AMD is rumored to be withdrawing from the enthusiast graphics segment with its next RDNA4 graphics architecture. This means there won't be a successor to its "Navi 31" silicon that competes at the high-end with NVIDIA; but rather one that competes in the performance segment and below. It's...
2 grand high end incoming