totally lol. didn't need a second guessWhat kind of caveman asks for a peer review of an excel then posts a screenshot? I bet you're public sector.
Edit: respectfully
So you got caught out by the inner scroll bar, too?What kind of caveman asks for a peer review of an excel then posts a screenshot? I bet you're public sector.
Edit: respectfully
pssh you guys are so needy. this is all we get in the NHS lolSo you got caught out by the inner scroll bar, too?And we do kind of need the column headers...
He is NOT earning an average of 3.5% Hes earning exactly what the headline rate is 7%.
I cannot believe you are still struggling to grasp this. Its why your struggling with your whole argument.
The effective rate over a 12mo window. You don't have to measure your wealth over a 12mo window. If he has a max of X per month then he is getting the highest rate he can afford at the point he actually has the money.He's only earning the full 7% on the first £1000. The 2nd £1000 is at 6.4% because it's only invested for 11 months, the 3rd £1000 will be invested for 10 months so effective rate of 5.8%. By payment 12 you're only earning one month's interest on that last £1000 making an effective annual rate of 0.6%. This all averages out to approx half the headline rate.
The effective rate over a 12mo window. You don't have to measure your wealth over a 12mo window. If he has a max of X per month then he is getting the highest rate he can afford at the point he actually has the money.
just had a look as i took your word for bond returns...they're less than 5% at the momentSo I was assuming the follow on rate was less than 5% bond return.
If ISA rates are 5% off the bat, why are you bothering drip feeding a regular saver and earning an average of only 3.5%?
Obviously stocks ISA are different beast so not comparable to fixed rate savers.
I just googled the bond rate as I'd been watching some Pensioncraft YouTube videos about buying fixed rate bonds and the guy on the channel is quite keen on it.
5% has been and gone. Mostly, but remember the 7% savings accounts are for tiny amounts of money, for larger sums the 4-4.5% yields on gilts is better than 5% in savings accounts for many people due to the way tax works on them with low coupons.just had a look as i took your word for bond returns...they're less than 5% at the moment
United Kingdom 1 Year Bond - Historical Data
United Kingdom 1 Year Bond. Updated interactive chart with historical bond data. List of all maturities yields and ratings info.www.worldgovernmentbonds.com
i'm no expert on bonds but i assume it works the same way...if so, then no brainer that regular saver/easy access combo is the right pick
Nor watched those videos but sounds like it's right. 4% in gilts with low coupons is like a 6.5% savings account for higher rate taxpayers.My interpretation of the Pensioncraft videos was that bonds are yielding better returns than savings accounts, which if that isn't the case then I don't get why he would bother suggesting them.
i'm assuming it's because you pay CGT rather than losing the personal allowance and paying income tax?for larger sums the 4-4.5% yields on gilts is better than 5% in savings accounts for many people due to the way tax works on them with low coupons.
He should get 7% on it and then move it a month later to the next greatest thing.What should he do with payment 12 in your example? Should he invest it at 7% for 1 month then move it or lock in 5% for 12 months?
Not to dispute there is a load of tosh over the last 100 pages but deciding whether to overpay or save in this upside down world of some folk with low rates and interest rates being high, it could be a real money printer.I'm fairly sure the last ~100 posts have nothing to do with mortgages - there's dedicated savings and investment threads, can we use them please?