Pension fund performance - do you monitor yours, how is it doing, do you actively change it?

Soldato
Joined
18 Oct 2002
Posts
14,724
So at the moment you're paying your pension post tax anyway aren't you? So your gross salary and qualified earnings are the same figure?

So Im not sure if that helps you to know what they would do under salary sacrifice unless you have specifically asked?

Qualified Earnings for Employer Contributions are any earnings between £6,240 and £50,270 — so they essentially reduce the gross figure by £6,240 before calculating the 3% (up to £50,270). So for a £50k salary, QE becomes £43,760, and then 3% of that is £1,312.80.

I will double-check whether salary sacrifice affects the figure on which the QE is based, but I assume it will reduce it. So £50k less the Salary Sacrifice, less the £6,240 would = the £1,065.30 in the Scenario 2 table.
 
Soldato
OP
Joined
14 Jul 2005
Posts
8,400
Location
Birmingham
I've found the figure £6240 as the threshold for mandatory contribution in a workplace pension. So your company are contributing the bare minimum they can do to comply with the government rules.


Minimum that has to be contributed by your employer​

As part of the overall percentage, the government has also set a minimum percentage that has to be contributed by your employer.

These minimum percentages do not apply to all of your salary. They apply to what you earn over a minimum amount (£6,240 in the 2023-2024 tax year) up to a maximum limit (£50,270 in the 2023-2024 tax year). This is sometimes called ‘qualifying earnings’.

That's harsh.
 
Last edited:
Soldato
Joined
30 Jan 2007
Posts
15,444
Location
PA, USA (Orig UK)
I contribute 7% at present, and my company matches upto 6%, so currently 13%. 401k though, so not a pension).

I didn't start this till a few years ago now and I am now in my mid forties, so not a great position. I only have about 2/3s of my salary in there as of right now.

I should still have a pension in the UK from government work of 7 years, so will need to look at that when I do retire eventually.

When my house sells and we move, I will also be looking at increasing contributions for my 401k, and also at other investments, as I really want to improve my future financial outlook.
 
Soldato
Joined
18 Oct 2002
Posts
14,724
I've found the figure £6240 as the threshold for mandatory contribution in a workplace pension. So your company are contributing the bare minimum they can do to comply with the government rules.


That's harsh.

Yeah, that's it.

It's a small business so doing the minimum required. It's still better than no employer contributions, which is what I was getting before the Workplace scheme was introduced. :D

I get benefits elsewhere, so can't complain.
 
Soldato
Joined
19 Jan 2006
Posts
16,051
Any good websites for seeing what you should have on your pot by age. I'm sure I found one one but can't find it again. It had percentages on it as well so you could by age see where you were.

Rarely do you find people paying what they should, they tend to pay what they can afford most times.

But then people are happy to pay £60 a month for a new iphone, £80 a month for a gym they haven't been to in years, £100 a month to sky etc..
 
Associate
Joined
30 Apr 2018
Posts
51
Soldato
Joined
8 Mar 2005
Posts
3,630
Location
London, UK
I'm curious if folk still opt for an annuity versus a drawdown, which seems to be a better method for a) ensuring maximum investment returns (assuming no catastrophic banking crashes), b) allowing money to be pulled as required and potentially better management of tax arrangements and c) ensuring all pension investments are accessible via beneficiary and retained within the estate after death.
 
Soldato
Joined
14 Mar 2005
Posts
16,826
Location
Here and There...
I had a look at mine today, still disappointing how little is in there and how much it is projected to be when I retire! Had a sniff around the funds (it’s managed by legal and general) there seem to be about 28 different funds it could be in but the whole lot has been in a new fund called ‘growth’ for the last which is only a year old so hard to compare over the longer term with the other funds, it is equity based and mostly US which seems sensible although I am tempted to diversify it and split between two similarly performing pots to hopefully a get a better long term average! The web portal seems intended to make it deliberately difficult to see how your money has been performing!
 
Soldato
Joined
13 Sep 2005
Posts
4,304
My company had some independent pension advice company in recently and it looks like they have advised to switch over the default fund to one with some kind of ESG rating. It's up to us whether we go with it but expect there's something in there that's not in our best interests like higher fees or similar. Will find it soon.
 
Last edited:
Associate
Joined
30 Apr 2018
Posts
51
I had a look at mine today, still disappointing how little is in there and how much it is projected to be when I retire! Had a sniff around the funds (it’s managed by legal and general) there seem to be about 28 different funds it could be in but the whole lot has been in a new fund called ‘growth’ for the last which is only a year old so hard to compare over the longer term with the other funds, it is equity based and mostly US which seems sensible although I am tempted to diversify it and split between two similarly performing pots to hopefully a get a better long term average! The web portal seems intended to make it deliberately difficult to see how your money has been performing!
My company do a similar thing, they put it in a target retirement dated fund, which you cannot view performance before you invested into it - which I've been in for 3 years, its done "ok" gaining 5.5% each of those 3 years but I took half of it and moved it into a US Equity fund which has been performing circa 20% for the past few years, I'm tempted to move it all out of the dated fund. makes me a little annoyed that I have potentially missed out on circa 15% a year for the past 3 years!
 
Associate
Joined
3 Oct 2012
Posts
362
My funds have averaged over 10 per cent per annum over the last 10 years. I track their performance every month and I only invest in global equity trackers. The default lifestyle fund is basically a tax on stupid people.
 
Soldato
Joined
8 Mar 2005
Posts
3,630
Location
London, UK
My funds have averaged over 10 per cent per annum over the last 10 years. I track their performance every month and I only invest in global equity trackers. The default lifestyle fund is basically a tax on stupid people.
Is "default lifestyle" in reference to the Vanguard Lifestrategy tracker or something different? I significantly reduced funds in LS and moved this over to SP500 (VUAG). Pensions are split between VWRP and VDWXEIA; I appreciate the significant overlap between the 2 but hedging my bets the UK will continue to perform poorly over the next decade or so.
 
Caporegime
Joined
13 Jan 2010
Posts
32,589
Location
Llaneirwg
My funds have averaged over 10 per cent per annum over the last 10 years. I track their performance every month and I only invest in global equity trackers. The default lifestyle fund is basically a tax on stupid people.

A bit harsh.
A tax on people who aren't saavy in finance.

It is hard. I consider myself way above average and it's quite confusing.

(the average bar is low)


Wish we could have a poll on "what vanguard funds are you in? "

I'm switching to vanguard this month. I have 5-6 individual pots in whatever they have always been in.

Time to start consolidating.
 
Last edited:
Soldato
Joined
29 Aug 2006
Posts
4,131
Location
In a world of my own
Wish we could have a poll on "what vanguard funds are you in? "

I'm switching to vanguard this month. I have 5-6 individual pots in whatever they have always been in.

Time to start consolidating.
Have a look at my post history in this thread if you want to consolidate into a low fee global tracker structure based on Vanguard funds.
 
Last edited:
Caporegime
Joined
13 Jan 2010
Posts
32,589
Location
Llaneirwg
Have a look at my post history in this thread if you want to consolidate into a low fee global tracker structure based on Vanguard funds.

Sounds like a lot of work for future.
I've noted down a few as I've followed the thread. And done a bit of reading. As gets closer to April I'll do a bit more research
 
Associate
Joined
3 Oct 2012
Posts
362
A bit harsh.
A tax on people who aren't saavy in finance.

It is hard. I consider myself way above average and it's quite confusing.

(the average bar is low)


Wish we could have a poll on "what vanguard funds are you in? "

I'm switching to vanguard this month. I have 5-6 individual pots in whatever they have always been in.

Time to start consolidating.

I use Vanguard for my ISA not pension. The occupational DC schemes I'm in offer the usual BlackRock, L&G, Mercer's own etc...
 
Back
Top Bottom