• Competitor rules

    Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.

NVIDIA RTX 50 SERIES - Technical/General Discussion

I don't have any positive expectations WRT price-to-performance improvements from Nvidia, i.e. not especially excited. So not worth staying up for, IMO. But of course will watch anyway to see what is coming out, straight from the horses mouth. I'll watch after work, drowning the disappointment in some tea.

At least I'll go to bed tomorrow knowing how AMD have let another chance slip, though hopefully they show 9950X3D/9900X3D CPUs too, to make up for it.

Like HWUB said in a recent Q&A, technically we'd be owed better on the lower-end from Nvidia, given the stagnation and poor show from things like the 4060, but I'm betting that will continue with 5000 series and/or get worse.

Fingers crossed for 4080 perf for £500, though I don't expect either AMD or Nvidia will deliver that.
 
Last edited:
They are too far behind on temporal upscaling/framegen and ray tracing performance for me to consider them, personally
If their next iteration of RDNA actually makes an attempt at hardware FSR and sees competitiveness with nvidia equivalent GPUs for raytracing then sure I'll consider it
 
To be fair everyone you hear that goes AMD 7900xtx has had a good experience and sticks with it.

If price per frame is so much better than nvidia..well there's worse things in life.
 
Everyone getting excited on this thread and lots of speculation.
In 3 weeks time all the posts will be about card size, power consumption, crashing, burnt connectors, RMA, cheap thermal pads and poorly applied paste
 
Last edited:
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom