Because it's not the same car never mind how you spin it.
Exactly, as soon as you put an "S" or "RS" in front of an Audi model ID prices start to go up, in some cases quite dramatically.
Because it's not the same car never mind how you spin it.
Not too mention the cost of repairing/replacing whatever it was driven into, medical bills for the people involved, hire car, legal costs etc.Just to highlight how cheap £730 for a £30k car actually is.
If the insurance company had 50 people for the same car and charged them £730, they would collect £36500. They would keep £32,590 after paying insurance premium tax.
If just 1 of those cars is stolen or written off, then they've made a massive loss as they also will need to cover employee costs and other costs such as paying commission to your favourite price comparison website or broker. This isn't even taking into account people claiming windscreen replacement, repairs for accidents involving others or injuries caused.
So I pay £350 a year fully com on a Audi A5 3.0L, been paying that for years
Buying an Audi S5 which has the same engine Audi A5 3.0L
Its the same size engine, literally the same car, because on the newer Audi's Audi have lowered the power such as the older S5 has a 4.2L engine and the new ones have a 3.0L engine, but the point is there is not much of a difference between an Audi A5 3.0L and a Audi S5 3.0L yet the insurance quote has more than doubled, the cheapest I found was 730 but my current provider quoted me £800
Ive got 15 years NCB, I dont understand why it should more than double when its basically the same car but with an S instead of a A, the A5 3.0L was an S line, the S5 3.0L is also an S line
The value of the car shouldnt affect the quote because as long as the car is below 40k in value
The insurance rep said to me that if the A5 is 15k and the S5 is 30k that wouldnt affect the insurance quote, as long as the car value doesnt exceed 40k
So if the S5 3.L has the same engine power as the A5 3.0L why is the insurance quote more than doubled?

There is some truth in this. I used to work for a large underwriter & when we were asking the value of the car it wasn't actually a rating factor below what I think was about £32k back then.So if your car is below £40k its all the same?
A £1000 car is the same to insure a £30k car. When it gets stolen or written off, the costs are the same.
Newer cars aren't also more complicated with more expensive repairs. Nope.
Heard it hear first...
Yeah it's really cheap. We're honoured that they are able to sell it to us. We should be thankful to our glorious capitalist overlords.Just to highlight how cheap £730 for a £30k car actually is.
If the insurance company had 50 people for the same car and charged them £730, they would collect £36500. They would keep £32,590 after paying insurance premium tax.
If just 1 of those cars is stolen or written off, then they've made a massive loss as they also will need to cover employee costs and other costs such as paying commission to your favourite price comparison website or broker. This isn't even taking into account people claiming windscreen replacement, repairs for accidents involving others or injuries caused.
Like most other business such as energy suppliers.Yeah it's really cheap. We're honoured that they are able to sell it to us. We should be thankful to our glorious capitalist overlords.
Admiral: '2024 was a remarkable year. We delivered an excellent result with a 28 per cent increase in turnover and 90 per cent increase in profit as we welcomed an additional 1.4 million customers to the Group.' Source.
Aviva: 'Group operating profit up 20% to £1,767m (2023: £1,467m).' Source.
Hastings: 'Operational profit2 increased by 70% to £193.2m, reflecting the improved underwriting performance.' Source.
Direct Line: '£395m increase in operating profit with 22pt Motor margin improvement'. Source
To be clear, I'm not saying these corps shouldn't be able to turn a profit. I'm saying that their jacking up of the prices under the banner of 'increased cost of business' is clearly horse ****.
Definitely an increase in theft Risk from an A5 to an S5 purely on the desirability of anything with an S or RS badge
Insurance can be weird though my old man pays less to insure a modified S3 then a 1.6 diesel Astra (granted both are sub £200 ) and my wife recently insured a new 300hp mini for half of what she was paying on a diesel Skoda worth a third as much.
It’s all about risk profiles for insurance companies they work on the metrics their allowed to work on and calculate a risk based on many many multiple factors add some insurance co magic beans in for good measure depending on their own appetite as a company ie do they want to grow a particular demographic of customers and as such should they sell that policy at cost or sometimes even at a loss and bobs your fathers brother. You have quote.
Now every insurer has their own risk measurements and their own outlook on how they want to shape or build their customer bases hence you see such wildly varying quotes whilst one insurer may want to flood their books with a particular type of risk another may have been burnt and want to offload as much of that as possible you may find one company is running at a huge loss to grow market share and simply doesn’t care about making money it’s all about getting new customers on the book and to hell with everything else
Yeah it's really cheap. We're honoured that they are able to sell it to us. We should be thankful to our glorious capitalist overlords.
Admiral: '2024 was a remarkable year. We delivered an excellent result with a 28 per cent increase in turnover and 90 per cent increase in profit as we welcomed an additional 1.4 million customers to the Group.' Source.
Aviva: 'Group operating profit up 20% to £1,767m (2023: £1,467m).' Source.
Hastings: 'Operational profit2 increased by 70% to £193.2m, reflecting the improved underwriting performance.' Source.
Direct Line: '£395m increase in operating profit with 22pt Motor margin improvement'. Source
To be clear, I'm not saying these corps shouldn't be able to turn a profit. I'm saying that their jacking up of the prices under the banner of 'increased cost of business' is clearly horse ****.
Fantastic insightClose.
The actuaries evaluate the risk profiles and the true cost of the various factors that that insurance co uses.*
This is then handed to the marketing & underwriting departments who look into what they think they can get away with at any price point bearing in mind what it will cost to support that business with expected loss rates.
Eg when I worked with actuaries for one of the big insurers years ago they said one of the lowest risk categories was 25-35 year old single males with high performance cars. Due to them generally caring about the car and driving. So decent tyres etc
One of the worst was Mr Mondeo with his missus and two fighting kids in the back. Cost conscious on everything so budget tyres etc.
Yet the market could not shrug off the Mondeo man should be cheap and the guy with the supercar should be expensive.
Its why some would spin off "specialist" insurers from their main brand in order to more closely market a particular segment.
Insurance also went in waves with "write for profit" at times and "write for volume" at others the switch coming as a response to not that great figures and the thought the other would be better.
* I am pretty sure it doesn't work that way any more but the Coop insurance was a unique case in that they actually published a points table that you as the consumer could use to work out your premium.
X points for Y postcode, Z points for age range, AA for males AB for females etc etc
Add them all up and cross reference to the points table and you could see your premium.
They were as a result either grossly expensive or very cheap compared to the rest of the market.
If you read your links, you will see just because something goes up doesn't mean they are making obscene profits.
Admiral increased profits by selling to more customers. Good on them, they must have been cheaper than their competitors.
Hastings made £193m with 3.9m customer. So about £50 each.
The Aviva one is misleading because that isn't just car insurance. They are a massive company.
Read your Direct Line one. Wow, 22pts improvement in motor margin. They went from losing 21% per £ to making 1%. Looks like they haven't increased prices enough to recover the £320m they lost in 2023.
I pay under £700 for a TTRS in a Slough postcode.while anything Audi S let alone RS series is £LOL - like well into the 4 figures.