Trading the stockmarket (NO Referrals)

In the long run, no we don't. But given that the stock market functions by rules made up by the US, for the benefit of the US, it's going to painful in the short to medium term until a new world order is established.

Sounds like we need a Smexit
 
My strategy to buy shares. Take out my original investment plus a percentage of the profits say 20% but keep the other 80% of the profits in shares. I continue to add cash plus divs from profits every financial year increasing my original investment each time I buy. Of course there have been times I sold too early but I learnt there has to be a cut off point with original investment, to safe keep my original capital and profits.

You cant completely isolate risk, but when my original money is out I feel less anxious.

I currently only have a percentage of my current gains(profits) in shares, the original , yearly cash contributions plus historical div plus historical percent profit is out gaining interest. So I am very relaxed now, I just let those shares bounce around as they are there for my dividends stream.
 
Last edited:
this migh be a silly question but do we need the US market?
i mean if they want to be silly then we need to program them out, they are the powerhouse manufacturing. they have some tech startups ect sure but so do other places

The issue is that US market is really the global market at the moment. There's a lot of companys that manufacture and sell around the world and there's a lot of companies that are from other parts of the world floated in the US market. It "was" seen as the place to be.. you just look at ARM vs RPI... both a UK computer companies and one did make a hell of a gain in the US market while the other floated in the FTSE and been a sitting duck. Yeah other countries do have international companies just not to size and number of the ones in the US market.
 
Weak response from EU

Might seem like it on the surface, but I suspect they (EU) are sensitive to the reciprocal hurt it causes for consumers on all sides.

That's the sign of responsible goverance.

Measured diplomacy and measured responses is what's needed to calm the markets...it's not all about revenge, as much as that would play into Trumps 'play book'...... if trump hurts the EU more, (by refusing to back down for example) then I'm sure the EU will tighten the vice further. And further, and further...

Steady hands and clear intentions are what's needed at the moment, not knee-jerk reactions.
 
Last edited:
Do you have anything to contribute? I'm not blindly clicking links, particularly not to Twitter.

8fEny2t.png


(I have nothing to add, nor have I read it all, I'm literally just that bored)
 
Last edited:
Anyone on here with Trading 2 1 2 accounts. Do you have more than the 85k coverage allowance in there? just trying to judge how reliable they are :)
 
Anyone on here with Trading 2 1 2 accounts. Do you have more than the 85k coverage allowance in there? just trying to judge how reliable they are :)

Trading 212 holds client assets in segregated accounts with a custodian, separate from its own assets, ensuring that client assets are easily identifiable and protected even in the event of Trading 212's insolvency.

So whilst the 85k FSCS protection is in place - the potential "loss" is almost not worth talking about.
 
Trading 212 holds client assets in segregated accounts with a custodian, separate from its own assets, ensuring that client assets are easily identifiable and protected even in the event of Trading 212's insolvency.

So whilst the 85k FSCS protection is in place - the potential "loss" is almost not worth talking about.
Cheers for the info
 
Back
Top Bottom