• Competitor rules

    Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.

NVIDIA RTX 50 SERIES - Technical/General Discussion

there have been some claims regarding the alleged 7% perf increase due to 576.02, seems the driver broke the temperature api and the chips are now boosting higher than safe temperature thresholds.. and another point on idle clocks at 22MHz, can someone check if the latter is true, does it actually impact the idle state power consumption or some read error
Surely the Boost algorithm is all firmware/bios based? Are people seeing increased temperatures?
 
there have been some claims regarding the alleged 7% perf increase due to 576.02, seems the driver broke the temperature api and the chips are now boosting higher than safe temperature thresholds.. and another point on idle clocks at 22MHz, can someone check if the latter is true, does it actually impact the idle state power consumption or some read error


Hilarious, more melted cards coming
 
Surely the Boost algorithm is all firmware/bios based? Are people seeing increased temperatures?
some have claimed higher temps or unstable overclocks (CTDs which were otherwise stable previously).. heres an article i found and there has been a cacophony of voices on reddit

the 22mhz idle state piqued my interest as well
i like to clean boot into drivers, too much work unless the thing is really as good as they say
 
Last edited:
Surely the Boost algorithm is all firmware/bios based? Are people seeing increased temperatures?
Exactly. I'm not seeing any increase in temperatures, or pin voltages on the new drivers. I haven't seen any other info suggesting this anywhere or on the derivers thread. (that I noticed).
 
some have claimed higher temps or unstable overclocks (CTDs which were otherwise stable previously).. heres an article i found and there has been a cacophony of voices on reddit

the 22mhz idle state piqued my interest as well
i like to clean boot into drivers, too much work unless the thing is really as good as they say

Whats the significance of the 22MHz idle?

Im on an FE so behaviour might be different to AIB but mine idles at 38MHz on dual 4K monitors (60 and 240Hz) and has done since launch.

I suspect it would be lower still on a single monitor.
 
Last edited:
i am on a 5090 fe and a inno3d 5090.. i remember the number was something like 180mhz at idle 572.83, the 4090 fe too was around 200Mhz (i am relying on memory here), significance being 7watt power consumption @22 mhz which is a very good reason for an upgrade, minus the other caveats as above
 
i am on a 5090 fe and a inno3d 5090.. i remember the number was something like 180mhz at idle 572.83, the 4090 fe too was around 200Mhz (i am relying on memory here), significance being 7watt power consumption @22 mhz which is a very good reason for an upgrade, minus the other caveats as above
Ill revisit mine on the new driver with a closer eye.
 
there have been some claims regarding the alleged 7% perf increase due to 576.02, seems the driver broke the temperature api and the chips are now boosting higher than safe temperature thresholds.. and another point on idle clocks at 22MHz, can someone check if the latter is true, does it actually impact the idle state power consumption or some read error
My card has been boosting to the same speeds, but I'm seeing higher temps and power draw when overclocked. It seems like my card is actually performing normally now, when it was underperforming previously.
 
No increased temperatures here, with or without the undervolt. I'm seeing a ~5% performance increase in some games, but none in others and even a slight loss of performance in Doom Eternal.
 

"There’s countless real world scenarios that we’ll see performance of the RTX 5060 Ti severely limited or even crippled by the 8GB frame buffer."

300px-Ah_Shit%2C_Here_We_Go_Again.jpg
 
Last edited:
"There’s countless real world scenarios that we’ll see performance of the RTX 5060 Ti severely limited or even crippled by the 8GB frame buffer."

300px-Ah_Shit%2C_Here_We_Go_Again.jpg


But Jensen promised RTX5000 was more efficient with AI memory, users here told me RTX5000 cards didn't need as much VRAM due to more efficient AI compression and AI memory usage

Personally I find it hilarious that there is already games that refuse to run on the 8gb 5060ti at just 1080p resolution. Jensen needs to add more AI
 
Last edited:
just think of the poor uninformed folk that end up buying one of these, well and truly hung out to dry by NVidia, yet im sure someone will be along soon to defend NVidia, that im sure of
Even worse, I bet most prebuilt PC's will have this useless card installed because it's cheaper than the 16GB one, and all the system specs will most likely say is just "5060 Ti".
 
That 8GB 5060 Ti is DOA already, it's ridiculous as it has plenty of power for 4K gaming, but it's completely crippled by that stupidly low frame buffer. Nvidia should do the right thing and just pull the 8GB card ASAP.

As a card for 1080p gaming I can understand it, there is no harm having the option and saving some money.
I think people are over-reacting

People who buy the 8GB model for 4K gaming deserve to have performance problems for being so stupid
 
Back
Top Bottom