Can you name any of these cases?
So you have no experience with autism then?
On the other hand, I'm 100% anti-COVID vax, but +IvermectinIt's a self-preservation lifestyle voice.
lol
You don't need to set the scene champ, we got it ages ago.
Euthanasia need to be considered in UK?
- Thread starter area51_for_psx
- Start date
Can you name any of these cases?
So you have no experience with autism then?
lol
You don't need to set the scene champ, we got it ages ago.
Soldato
- Joined
- 7 Aug 2004
- Posts
- 11,279
Fair dos, if it touches on areas personal to you.
Introducing a new nightmare for everyone: I work for the NHS but am aspiring to be the UK embodiment of RFK JR.
I'm not anti-vaxx, I just insist childhood vaccines be administered very slowly over a massive period of time spanning years. No more 'the judge said the first to get your kid 100% vaccinated gets custody', so Mum gets them all at once, and then she suddenly doesn't want custody as her happy normal 5 year old went non-verbal and autistic overnight.
On the other hand, I'm 100% anti-COVID vax, but +Ivermectin
Setting the scene for how utterly different and alien I am from so many on here.
I hope you don’t have a responsible role in the nhs. Pace vaccines for sure but not years. Already proven autism and vaccines have no link.
Last edited:
What has any of that got to do with this thread?Fair dos, if it touches on areas personal to you.
Introducing a new nightmare for everyone: I work for the NHS but am aspiring to be the UK embodiment of RFK JR.
I'm not anti-vaxx, I just insist childhood vaccines be administered very slowly over a massive period of time spanning years. No more 'the judge said the first to get your kid 100% vaccinated gets custody', so Mum gets them all at once, and then she suddenly doesn't want custody as her happy normal 5 year old went non-verbal and autistic overnight.
On the other hand, I'm 100% anti-COVID vax, but +Ivermectin
Setting the scene for how utterly different and alien I am from so many on here.
Let me reply in your style.
Yeah I can.
No, my brother got done in by vaccine induced autism / asperger's.
Last edited by a moderator:
What cases can you name?
Both my kids didn't get the MMR vaccine and guess what my son is a high functioning autistic and we're pretty sure my daughter has some form of ism as we call it.
Do you have any experience of losing a family member to either cancer or dementia? If you had you wouldn't be quite so condescending of people's views on this.
I hope you don't have a job looking after people with the attitude you have shown here.
Last edited:
Soldato
- Joined
- 31 Jan 2022
- Posts
- 3,611
- Location
- UK
The fear was that there weren't enough safeguards in place to ensure that the vulnerable weren't feeling pressured to end it all. You can't review this sort of stuff after people have died. That's the basis of a scandal, and I can see one coming....
I think the opposition was right to be cautious and the pro campaigners just wanted the bill passing no matter what.
Last edited:
It was the proponents of the Bill who forwarded the amendment (that was passed) earlier in the year to replace the check box stamping of a judge with an actual panel of experts who would scrutinize all the evidence.
Hardly seems like wanting it passed 'no matter what'
Associate
- Joined
- 19 May 2010
- Posts
- 1,842
- Location
- Cheltenham
Definite troll - the ivermectin nonsense was the step too far.
Soldato
- Joined
- 31 Jan 2022
- Posts
- 3,611
- Location
- UK
I'm talking about the general supporters, who seem to be ignoring the fact that this was not a vote about adopting/not adopting the principle of assisted dying, rather it was about the details.
Nobody is saying there shouldn't be safeguards but equally these people haven't got the time to wait. I said earlier this will need reviewing probably more closely than anything else too make sure that the system that has been asked for works.
The people who may take up this will already have a comprehensive medical file with multiple doctors entries on severity and prognosis.. X rays, scans and post operative notes will all be there. The review by experts will be little more than gaining this knowledge and confirming their status. Many of the applicants do not have months left to work through a list of appointments and jump through hoops. If they can leave their bed at all.
I expect that people being lodged on the scheme by a helpful beneficiary to their will will soon be found out, particularly if there is no medical proofs.
lol, such a delighful chap aren't you.
I've had loads of support from the NHS for all sorts of things. Yes the front lines can sometimes leave a bit to be desired but once you get to the more serious stuff, I can't fault it. One of the best medical support systems in the world.
Dunno why they'd hire you though, must've been really desperate.
They've posted in the NHS thread to see if they can get a reaction in there by the looks of the post.
Hes either trolling, or thicker than a stack of bricks. Neither of these warrants any responses tbh.
The're probably both, I did say not to bother on that thread, but let's see shall we
Last edited:
If there were more like me in management in the NHS, and we were allowed frank and open discourse without self-censorship, the NHS wouldn't be the failing cash hog it is now.
I'm actually very good at my job in the NHS, believe it or not.
Me being thick you say. I view you types the same way. Read a Substack and sort yourselves out, instead of running interference / heckling on behalf of official narratives, and the world's problems might start getting fixed.
I'm actually very good at my job in the NHS, believe it or not.
Me being thick you say. I view you types the same way. Read a Substack and sort yourselves out, instead of running interference / heckling on behalf of official narratives, and the world's problems might start getting fixed.
