water surge pricing

Paying for it is the absolute key and I’m pleased to see the recommendation for mandatory water meters. We live in a world where people get a clean glass out of the cupboard rinse it with water then refill it to drink it (so many people myself included do this) we have become frivolous in our use of drinking water and people need to face up to it and take responsibility.
Sorry but I don't know anyone that rinses a glass before filling it. I think worst offenders are people that bath instead of shower. That must be 50-60l every time.
 
Sorry but I don't know anyone that rinses a glass before filling it. I think worst offenders are people that bath instead of shower. That must be 50-60l every time.
Loads of people do it, ask someone for a glass of water it’s hilarious! The bath v’s shower thing depends on lots of things like how often you do it, a couple of baths a week is better than a couple of showers a day. A lot of modern showers also use more water than you think and most people are terrible at estimating how long they are actually in the shower for. You can save loads of water (and energy) by going for a military shower ie get in and soak yourself, turn the shower off and soap and shampoo, then turn the shower back on to rinse down.

It was intended as an illustration of the many frivolous unthinking ways we use water which being metered would reduce.
 
Last edited:
Are there seriously many people in this country not on meters? I have one with bills of £57 a month in a flat with a sink a toilet and a shower I can only assume between the water main and the property theres a massive sink hole where the water is pouring out


Oh yeah right where its estimated it'll take £107bn of investment where water companies have paid out at minimum £57bn in handouts and bonuses to shareholders and bosses where Southern water bills are going up £200 a year on average and the boss of same company has just doubled his £600,000 salary. No bonuses allowed by the govt? No problem I'll just double my salary instead!
Only about 60% of households in the UK have a water meter and you can bet it’s the higher users that resist having one the most!

Totally agree the water industry needs epic reform, it should never have been privatised as they have effectively been massively loaded with debt to pay shareholder dividends knowing that the government can’t allow them to fail. Our current model has failed it is time for a massive overhaul but that doesn’t mean we shouldn’t be educating people and reducing water usage!
 
Nope, and frankly, you're being silly here - detergents absolutely can damage plants, and there are further issues with edible plants too - the advice is to use it from rinse cycles on a washing machine. I doubt bleach poured down a sink is going to do much good...


Or you could just use a water butt like I pointed out in the first place!



I don't have an issue in principle with metering, I do think the lack of infrastructure is dumb though, not building a major reservoir for thirty years, for example, while the population has grown significantly in that time is an entirely self-inflicted problem.
One of my very first posts in this thread said the water companies should be providing every household in the UK that can have one a water but or two out of their bonkers profits it would be a dividend for the people.
 
Loads of people do it, ask someone for a glass of water it’s hilarious!

It was intended as an illustration of the many frivolous unthinking ways we use water which being metered would reduce.
Water runs a bit warm from our cold tap in summer unless we run it for a bit.
 
Water runs a bit warm from our cold tap in summer unless we run it for a bit.
Does for most people, really we should all put a jug in the fridge for the warmer months rather than run the tap until it goes cold every time, which you can bet people would do more if they were paying for the bit that went down the drain.
 
I have lead pipes (as do many older properties). You're advised to run the tap a few seconds before using to clear any dissolved lead.

But yeah I also do the rinse the clean glass thing. I think it's because a glass sitting in a cupboard can get a bit of dust.
 
Does for most people, really we should all put a jug in the fridge for the warmer months rather than run the tap until it goes cold every time, which you can bet people would do more if they were paying for the bit that went down the drain.
Maybe, but you are talking pence here, in my experience people dont change behavior to save a few p. As for water butts, they are fine as said when it rains, mine were empty from late Feb until last week when it finally rained!

But yeah I also do the rinse the clean glass thing. I think it's because a glass sitting in a cupboard can get a bit of dust.
Store them upside down.
 
if you assume people are blasting the tap full blast and splashing water all over the room sure.
Where I live, out in the sticks, pressure is roughly 20lpm on half blast.
In town it's closer to 46lpm.
The UK standard is 10-15, for any tap. Anything below is classified as low pressure.

Are there seriously many people in this country not on meters? I have one with bills of £57 a month in a flat with a sink a toilet and a shower I can only assume between the water main and the property theres a massive sink hole where the water is pouring out
Depends on the area. Thames Water only has 11% of its domestic customers metered and hardly any commercial ones.

Oh yeah right where its estimated it'll take £107bn of investment
£193bn. That's a very minimalist estimate, though, which is typical of the OFWAT system and the main reason why there's been so little investment in the past 20 years.

No bonuses allowed by the govt? No problem I'll just double my salary instead!
Salary increase to mitigate bonus loss has already been outlawed.

Totally agree the water industry needs epic reform, it should never have been privatised as they have effectively been massively loaded with debt to pay shareholder dividends knowing that the government can’t allow them to fail.
It worked fine for 12 years, until unscrupulous foreign investors were allowed to take ownership.
 
Does for most people, really we should all put a jug in the fridge for the warmer months rather than run the tap until it goes cold every time, which you can bet people would do more if they were paying for the bit that went down the drain.

Not necessarily, many people are on meters already and running the taps for a bit before getting a glass of water is going to cost practically nothing - all this scrimping stuff you're talking about doesn't really touch the sides - it mostly just lets people feel good about themselves.
 
Maybe, but you are talking pence here, in my experience people dont change behavior to save a few p.

The paradox of water costs - plenty of complaints that it's too expensive but when you start looking at whether currently unmetered people would change behaviours based on metered cost, they almost certainly wouldn't change much because when you're paying about £2-£2.50 for 1000 litres of water, saving 50 litres here or there isn't worth the effort to save 10p. Even when you add associated sewerage charges, the figures just don't stack up enough for people to bother changing habits.

You might cut down on people throwing thousands of litres over their carefully maintained gardens but as you say, you won't meaningfully alter smaller behaviours like people rinsing glasses or running a tap until it's colder.
 
The paradox of water costs - plenty of complaints that it's too expensive but when you start looking at whether currently unmetered people would change behaviours based on metered cost, they almost certainly wouldn't change much because when you're paying about £2-£2.50 for 1000 litres of water, saving 50 litres here or there isn't worth the effort to save 10p. Even when you add associated sewerage charges, the figures just don't stack up enough for people to bother changing habits.

You might cut down on people throwing thousands of litres over their carefully maintained gardens but as you say, you won't meaningfully alter smaller behaviours like people rinsing glasses or running a tap until it's colder.
I’d suggest the 5p carrier bag charge says otherwise.

I’ve seen people spend £100 in Tesco and refuse to spend 30p on bags and they chuck it all in the trolley/car loose.
 
I’ve seen people spend £100 in Tesco and refuse to spend 30p on bags and they chuck it all in the trolley/car loose.
30p a bag, What that like 15 years ago

If there any cheap ones left there £2 each , But it normally only the £4 per bag left
So you would then need to pay £20 for 5 bags on top of the £100 of shopping

£2

£4
 
Last edited:
I’d suggest the 5p carrier bag charge says otherwise.

I’ve seen people spend £100 in Tesco and refuse to spend 30p on bags and they chuck it all in the trolley/car loose.

My experience would suggest those sort of people are in the (significant) minority - every time I go shopping most of the self service tills have people filling up a new 5p plastic bag or two (though I guess maybe some are just ticking the 'I didn't use a bag' option and not paying?).

That's also a scenario with a direct immediate associated cost too, where it's extremely blunt for people - have a bag and pay extra now or don't have a bag. With water it's 'adjust your habits now for several months and you might save a fiver on your bill later' - if people don't see an immediate impact, it's harder to reinforce the association between the habit and the cost.
 
Last edited:
I’ve seen people spend £100 in Tesco and refuse to spend 30p on bags and they chuck it all in the trolley/car loose.

I do this all the time. In fact I'd say I do it like this 90% of the time. I've got tons of bags in the car. When using self-scan I just fling it all in the trolley, check out, and then pack at my leisure at the car. This means if I decide to remove something mid-shop I'm not having to rummage through bags, if I get one of those "you filthy thief quality checks" the stuff is all there ready to go instead of emptying bags. I'm also quite fussy in how I pack my bags, this is to allow for easier unpacking at home. In order to do this I'd have to shop in a specific order which I'm not keen on doing either.

So I just shop however I want, scan it and fling it in the trolley.The anti-thief attendant can then scan whatever they want and I can pack how I want at the car, allowing me to unpack as conveniently as possible when I get home.


Just reading this back, I might be overthinking this a tad.
 
30p a bag, What that like 15 years ago

If there any cheap ones left there £2 each , But it normally only the £4 per bag left
So you would then need to pay £20 for 5 bags on top of the £100 of shopping

£2

£4
It started out at 5p per bag, 30p = 6 bags. Those Waitrose bags are not exactly equivalent to the single use bags and those types of bag have always had a material cost.

It’s hard to see past anecdotal evidence sometimes but here is the reality of the 5p charge.

While you are not likely to see a 98% reduction with water meters, research suggests it is material this report suggests 20%:
 
Last edited:
It started out at 5p per bag, 30p = 6 bags. Those Waitrose bags are not exactly equivalent to the single use bags and those types of bag have always had a material cost.

It’s hard to see past anecdotal evidence sometimes but here is the reality of the 5p charge.
Think plastic & Paper bags have been banned since around 2021 or 2022

I found about Jersey

I haven't seen the old 5p plastic carrier bags forsale over here for some years now.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top Bottom