Let's talk about interiors

What's even crazier is people paying extra for coloured seatbelts (looks like the only colour in that car). It's all right angles, which is likely cheaper to make.
Show me the option to select just seatbelt colour change... you cant, its part of a pack.
 
Personally prefer having a digital dash plus a decent screen for Carplay, Waze etc. Definitely feel as though I have the perfect combination in my mk7.5 Golf, plus proper buttons/controls for the important functions:
Agree with this. It's the same reason why I prefer iDrive 7 over iDrive 8.
 
No, you might need to add £20k of options to make the spec better, but I doubt very much that the base specification of a £130K car could not be described as "decent" at the very least, by anyone with any normal sense of expectation.

You clearly don't know Porsche!
e.g. until very recent heated front seats on a £160k Porsche Turbo was an option. These days most tech is still optional - radar cruise, which was standard on a 2014 £20k VW Golf and most cheap Toyota's

In terms of car pricing £50k is pretty much entry level brand, SUV medium size family car. You can pay £53k for a petrol Skoda Kodiak ! (plus options)
Pricing - Most people are stuck in 2005 still, Inflation happened !-> e.g. £28k in 2005 is now worth the same as £50k in 2025
 
Last edited:
In terms of car pricing £50k is pretty much entry level brand, SUV medium size family car. You can pay £53k for a petrol Skoda Kodiak ! (plus options)
Pricing - Most people are stuck in 2005 still -> e.g. £28k in 2005 is now worth the same as £50k in 2025

In what world? An "entry" Ford Focus is £29k.

Edit: glossed over the SUV bit. A Kuga starts at £32k.
 
Last edited:
Citing the list price of a Kodiaq vRS 7 Seater as 'entry level medium SUV' is just utterly LOL

The actual 'entry level brand medium SUV' from VAG would be the Seat Ateca, which starts at £30k give or take, with the top trim FR Black Edition starting at £38k for the auto.
 
Last edited:
Citing the list price of a Kodiaq vRS 7 Seater as 'entry level medium SUV' is just utterly LOL
My point about the VRS was a separate point to the medium sized SUV reference. Just highlighting cars cost more than they did 20 years ago :)
Also the Volvo equivalent to Skoda Kodiak is over £100k..The Kia equivalent £70k... and this VRS only has 260bhp, which in 2025 is entry level VW ID4 performance (Which are also about £50k RRP)
 
Last edited:
In terms of car pricing £50k is pretty much entry level brand, SUV medium size family car. You can pay £53k for a petrol Skoda Kodiak ! (plus options)
Pricing - Most people are stuck in 2005 still
It is crazy though because the vast majority of people lap it up because it makes their sal sac £### a month for a £##k car look like a "no brainer".

I avoid debt and anything on the drip like the plague, thankfully car prices are irrelevant to me while I have a company car but I often wonder what I would buy myself if I was to change jobs. Something well looked after, Japanese brand and about 8 years old seems to be the answer from a quick AT search :/

That is taking my last car purchase price (£6.5k in 2007) and adjusting up for inflation to todays equivalent (about £11k). Last time round I got a 4 year old mint Octavia vRS with 24k on the clock :p

Edit - getting back to the original topic for a second... at least there is no chance of touch screen overload on an 8 year old car :D
 
Last edited:
What an earth are you on about - £50k being entry level family SUV? You can buy any number of family SUVs for £30k ish. Mazda CX5 is £31k for example.
Yep, my bad, I was referring to the vehicles in the next size up, which generally start around £40k for base, and then around £50k for mid spec models.
 
I wonder how much car manufacturers spend on the "infotainment" system software, because they are all pretty poor from a GUI and functionality point of view. None are as useful as just a phone in a phone holder and they rarely get updates (sometimes never, sometimes it's not even free), or aren't supported for long.
 
Last edited:
I wonder how much car manufacturers spend on the "infotainment" system software, because they are all pretty poor from a GUI and functionality point of view. None are as useful as just a phone in a phone holder and they rarely get updates (sometimes never, sometimes it's not even free), or aren't supported for long.
Well thats what car play is for...
 
I wonder how much car manufacturers spend on the "infotainment" system software, because they are all pretty poor from a GUI and functionality point of view. None are as useful as just a phone in a phone holder and they rarely get updates (sometimes never, sometimes it's not even free), or aren't supported for long.

Thats a bit of a stretch, the phone in a holder wont change the seat heating or massage setting or the full AR HUD capability, or 3D surround , or trailer bulb test sequence, or manage Plug & charge or the remote start / climate settings.

Just tell me you havent driven a modern car without telling me...
 
Thats a bit of a stretch, the phone in a holder wont change the seat heating or massage setting or the full AR HUD capability, or 3D surround , or trailer bulb test sequence, or manage Plug & charge or the remote start / climate settings.

Just tell me you havent driven a modern car without telling me...

Those are basic car functions which should be physical buttons anyway. They just made everything awkward by putting it on a screen.
 
Last edited:
The middle panel in my iX has buttons, including a 3D surround view button, and they all work very well. The only thing I would change is swap the 'Tel' button for a 'Climate' button. Climate is used much more often and I don't need to access my phone book from here. You can also feel these as the icons/text are raised above the panels

54678052903_74b0da3cb3_c.jpg



I like the way new car interior's are going. I personally don't miss the dials and buttons of old.

BMW have previewed the interior for the new iX3 launching later this year, which has a pano screen spanning across the area the below windscreen, which I think looks good.

54678059379_7283456587_c.jpg



Also, HUD's are getting larger and able to show more information, which may ultimately replace the need for screens into the future.
 
Last edited:
^ absolutely no way! That looks hideous.

Well any manufacturer won't be getting any money from me if they continue down this god awful road.

How the frick are you supposed to quickly and easily press the + button for the temperature on that screen?! Now you might be able to rest your hand on the bit below the screen for some support, so fair enough, but about any icon in the middle or top of the screen?!

I just don't get it.

(well I do, they do it because it's cheaper and easier to make)
 
Back
Top Bottom