Stalker 2

3.6 years? Rookie numbers you need to pump those numbers up!

I had my Q6700 for almost 5 years! And now the 12700K is coming on 4 years and from what I can see, another 3 years easily in the bag :cool:

Yeh, been running the 12700K @ 5.1/4 since Dec 21, stellar chip, and likewise, can see me running it for a great while longer.

And 3.6 was the clock speed, not the amount of years running it! :p
 
Last edited:
Lol what did you do to that poor motherboard for it to not hold up :cry: meanwhile 286/386/486 boards are still alive :P
I was quickly losing the number of functional USB slots, they just stopped working. Saw it as a prime opportunity to upgrade. That PC had a hard life though, being carted up and down the country for the majority of its life.
 
I was quickly losing the number of functional USB slots, they just stopped working. Saw it as a prime opportunity to upgrade. That PC had a hard life though, being carted up and down the country for the majority of its life.
That's the first time I've heard of a computer working county lines! Did the police ever catch on? :P
 
Last edited:
Finally finished it for the first time today (60ish hours of gameplay). It was one hell of a grind for the last 2-3 hours.

Might start again and try for a different ending!
 
Thanks. Not sure what it is then. I'm using i5-12500, 3600TI and 32GB Ram. It's handling the rest of the game very well.
That CPU isn't very fast. I'm getting around 40 fps +, maybe a bit higher 30s for very short period of times. Ryzen 5800x3d with some mods.

It's odd, as if I stay still, the FPS will jump 15, even 20 fps higher than sprinting around. Maybe it's compiling shaders (altough it does at start up), don't know.
 
Isn't AMD better in just about every way these days though? Latest Intel offerings have been poor to say the least.

Maybe now in 2025 so I guess the statement was true, but when my 13900K was released there was nothing from AMD (apart from hugely expensive Threadripper) that could encode x265 as fast as this can.

Even today, only AMDs very top 2 X3D CPUs can match it. For me it was a great buy, it's over 2 years old and can still keep up with AMDs best. It just falls a bit short in gaming, but at 4K it's not noticeable. And even when it was released people were all onboard the AMD train saying that there was no point getting Intel. I can push encoding to the e-cores, which is still faster than encoding on a 9900k, and then play games using the p-cores, with no slowdown. Show me an affordable AMD CPU which can do that... I agree that's Intel's current Ultra series do not hold up to AMD's current series, but the 13900k and 14900k are still great and can match AMDs offerings
 
Maybe now in 2025 so I guess the statement was true, but when my 13900K was released there was nothing from AMD (apart from hugely expensive Threadripper) that could encode x265 as fast as this can.

Even today, only AMDs very top 2 X3D CPUs can match it. For me it was a great buy, it's over 2 years old and can still keep up with AMDs best. It just falls a bit short in gaming, but at 4K it's not noticeable. And even when it was released people were all onboard the AMD train saying that there was no point getting Intel. I can push encoding to the e-cores, which is still faster than encoding on a 9900k, and then play games using the p-cores, with no slowdown. Show me an affordable AMD CPU which can do that... I agree that's Intel's current Ultra series do not hold up to AMD's current series, but the 13900k and 14900k are still great and can match AMDs offerings

Thats why I said "Who buys a intel cpu in 2025?" :D:cry:
 
Isn't AMD better in just about every way these days though? Latest Intel offerings have been poor to say the least.

Plus the security holes, embarrassing.

PS: You finished beta testing this yet? Doesn't sound like it'such better.
 
Last edited:
  • Haha
Reactions: TNA
Just use GPU for encoding all video, I encode 4k 60fps at super speeds, a 37 min video transcodes in under 9 mins using AV1, which is what everyone should be using now anyway as it's better than H265 in basically every way :cool:


UE 5.5.4 update coming, looks like this is the priority too, though no mention of hardware RT, though is suspect this will be included given 5.5+ optimisations.



The game uses UE 5.1 for ref, and Epic added big CPU improvements into UE 5.4, so jumping right to 5.5.4 should show some significant gains in performance and image quality since 5.4 also fixed Nanite quality and other things.

From a comment:

Lots of S2's potential is held back by shaky performance. The thing everyone complains about, A-Life, has improved tons since release, but it's still hampered by a tiny NPC spawn bubble of 100m. Which, IMO, is likely a console performance-related bottleneck, alongside a general UE5 performance bottleneck.


Every UE5 update has had optimization improvements. The latest version of Unreal, 5.6, claims to have particularly huge ones. People were asking about an engine update, but I always assumed that would be way too much work (S2 supposedly runs on a heavily customised UE5 5.1).


GSC Game World prioritizing an engine update means they can really overhaul optimization and performance, then go crazy with adding the features everyone wants to have after. The community manager, Mol1t, also confirmed on Discord whilst they are definitely targeting 5.5.4, going to 5.6 is possible if testing goes smoothly enough.


Everyone complains about games coming out half-baked, but given GSC Game World still have a fair chunk of their staff actively based in Ukraine, I'm willing to cut them more slack than anyone else. Their documentary showed they're dealing with a way more difficult development context than any other company I'm aware of. Yet despite the circumstances, they got S2 out the door, they've non-stop patched it since release (5 major ones so far), not just fixing bugs but adding gameplay tweaks and new features based on what players provide feedback on. They dropped everything they promised patches would feature so far, and this roadmap doesn't even mention the single player DLCs and multiplayer. Which, as far as I'm aware, is still going to be done at one point or another.


Stalker 2 is going to be unrecognisable a year from now in the best way. I can't wait to see how it turns out.
 
Last edited:
Playing thru a 2nd time and I've just got to the faust fight.....and I'm wearing crappy science armour compared to last time...it's not going well.
Spoiler muchhhh!!! :cry: Not that anyone will care as they're not missing out on anything as this game is pants in every conceivable way, so they're not missing out on anything, nor having it spoilt being told :cry:
God I wish I could get those 60 hours back :P
 
Room for improvements..?

Screenshot-2025-08-13-20-07-05-262-com-microsoft-emmx-edit.jpg

Our main mission in the near future is upgrading the game to Unreal Engine 5.5.4. This will bring new features and tools to make the Zone an even better place, but more importantly — bringing the latest Unreal Engine 5 optimizations will lead to better stability and performance.....


.
 
Last edited:
Room for improvements..?

roadmap.png



Our main mission in the near future is upgrading the game to Unreal Engine 5.5.4. This will bring new features and tools to make the Zone an even better place, but more importantly — bringing the latest Unreal Engine 5 optimizations will lead to better stability and performance.....


.

That's the old update picture, there's a newer one out, shown in your link.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top Bottom