Is this the unraveling of CyclingMikey?

I've watched tons of his videos just this week(probably about 40) and can say with certainty that he isn't a risk on the road and doesn't go after anyone that isn't committing a crime.
Oh I’m not hating I’m this chap - don’t know him, never seen or heard of him before this thread. No doubt the vids he’ll be posting will be of him holding the moral and legal high ground and quite rightly chastising wrong doers - for that I salute him.
I just have found, in my experience, people like him who ‘police’ the public aren’t usually the most sensible of people - hence I’d put good money on this chap having accosted perfectly innocent people during my his personal crusade. Will those make it to his YouTube channel - certainly not.
 
Agree with Littlenose about the throwing of the bike, doing that was too far and isn't adding to his cause.

However you also have to ask why the driver sped off, if I committed an offense like going through a No Entry and a bike was thrown at my car I wouldn't be speeding off unless I knew the book was going to be thrown at me and by the amount of no license, no MOT, no Tax and no insurance drivers plus drugs and alcohol in their systems I'm betting that's why they got out of there..
 
@Thekwango's point was that he's not going to publish videos which show him in a bad light, that would be self-defeating
And that’s why I give these sort of public crusaders a wide birth. I’ve no doubt the chap has done some good with his videos - once he’s passed them on to the police. But I’d not trust that every one (or even 99%) of this chaps interactions with the public are legit.
 
Last edited:
@Thekwango's point was that he's not going to publish videos which show him in a bad light, that would be self-defeating.

Being pragmatic here though, he's uploading several hundred videos a year of people committing clear and obvious traffic offences focused mostly on phone use and driving through closures or down roads the wrong way - he doesn't really need to dabble into the world of potentially hassling people who might actually be doing nothing wrong, he's got more than enough content anyway without even needing to think about taking that risk.
 
Being pragmatic here though, he's uploading several hundred videos a year of people committing clear and obvious traffic offences focused mostly on phone use and driving through closures or down roads the wrong way - he doesn't really need to dabble into the world of potentially hassling people who might actually be doing nothing wrong, he's got more than enough content anyway without even needing to think about taking that risk.

Oh he probably doesn't do it deliberately, more inadvertently through virtue of being overzealous
 
Answer my question.

Need a reminder?

Given he routinely sends his videos to the police and they prosecute people based on them but don't prosecute him for any vigilante related offenses, or even offences such as obstructing the highway, that would certainly imply the authorities think what he's doing is acceptable and legal.

(Up until the incident where he pushed his bike in front of a car and caused a collision, that may yet land him in hot water legally)
 
I am kind of looking forward to whether he does face charges for throwing his bike in front of that car. The 3rd person footage of him standing there staring at it, then running out as soon as it moves whilst still staring at it... is pretty damning on him!

I'm actually on his side in many cases . He utterly ruins it though when he cycles up a line of stationary cars in traffic who clearly haven't moved in 10 minutes, to record them using WhatsApp. The letter of and spirit of the law often diverge, and it feels like he lacks the brain capacity to appreciate that. Which is irritating.
 
I'm actually on his side in many cases . He utterly ruins it though when he cycles up a line of stationary cars in traffic who clearly haven't moved in 10 minutes, to record them using WhatsApp. The letter of and spirit of the law often diverge, and it feels like he lacks the brain capacity to appreciate that. Which is irritating.

Yeah, personally I won't touch my phone while the engine is running and in 99% of cases there is zero reason for people to be paying attention to their phones when driving other than obviously when used in a cradle as a sat nav, but you do need a bit of discretion as to when people are and aren't causing a problem.
 
Yeah, personally I won't touch my phone while the engine is running and in 99% of cases there is zero reason for people to be paying attention to their phones when driving other than obviously when used in a cradle as a sat nav, but you do need a bit of discretion as to when people are and aren't causing a problem.
I don't agree or disagree with you tbh. It must be hellish sitting in London traffic on the daily. From what I can see though, there has been studies done that suggest phone users drove as poorly or worse than drink drivers. Apparently phone usage while stationary can impair performance and reaction times similar to drink driving. Even after putting the phone down you can be "hung hover" from it for 15-30 seconds. The UK takes such a hard stance that I wouldn't be tempted, especially with the amount of tech loaded into cars now (nav, carplay etc). If people can't put their phones down to sit for 30+ minutes on the commute, they've got bigger issues.
 
I'll take a wild guess that he's on the autism scale and if he's unlucky will annoy a Kenneth Noye type at some point.
Even the two balaclava covered cretins in the video could have been a bit stabby. I wouldn't be surprised if the police had asked him to stop.
 
Last edited:
I just wish that British culture thought that it was unacceptable to use your phone while driving around in 2 tons of range rover or whatever....

I think i just hate the idea of an insufferable vigilante recording number plates giving a smug 1 liner to the camera how he's getting a ticket and £80 fine or whatever in 2 weeks.

I think i am extremely respectful of the laws and other people in all situations, probably to my own detriment, but seeing this guy just winds me up so much more than it should. Lol.
 
Last edited:
So in the last couple of weeks a video emerged of Michael Van Erp, commonly known as 'CyclingMikey', a notorious cycling vigilante, throwing his bike at a car.

Actually, that's a cynical misrepresentation by the right-wing media of what happened. He did not intentionally push his expensive (legal EAPC) bike into the car. He was trying to get himself and his bike into the middle of the lane quickly to block the car from continuing to drive the wrong way up the lane. He believed that the car would then stop and have to reverse back to the queue. Cars are supposed to give way to pedestrians. If you watch the videos of similar incidents on his YouTube channel you will see he regularly uses this strategy.

He just underestimated the recklessness of the motorist and then could not stop his heavy bike without getting hit himself. In fact, he narrowly missed being hit himself. After that the driver should have stopped, but he just drove off. Why would he deliberately push his expensive EAPC, loaded with his possessions, in front of a car when he knew it could not stop? The motorist drove at him deliberately (on the wrong side of the road past several "No Entry" signs) and actually accelerated as it approached him.

South African accent gay guy I assume?

You assume wrong. He was born in the Netherlands and grew up in Zimbabwe. He has two sons, so not sure why you think he is gay?

How he’s not dead is remarkable. Highly unlikeable person with a terrible approach to his cause.

He's come close:

In September 2021, while at "Gandalf Corner", Van Erp ended up on the bonnet of celebrity talent agent Paul Lyon-Maris's Range Rover while trying to stop him from making an illegal right turn. Since Lyon-Maris continued to drive with Van Erp on the bonnet, he was charged with assault and dangerous driving, besides the lesser charge of contravening a keep-left sign. Source

Like almost everything on the internet these days, just assume it’s staged for content purposes.

No, it's real. He passes on the video evidence he collects to the Police and there have been thousands of convictions based upon it.

Does he have some mental health issues?

When he was 19-years-old his father was killed by a drunk driver. At school he witnessed a friend being knocked down by a taxi driving the wrong way round a traffic island. His friend survived, but was badly injured. Hence his disdain for motorists who deliberately flout the rules.

Exactly, there are plenty of videos where he ignores anything illegal committed on two wheels, including his own actions that often flout the law. He’s as bad as those he reports. All for clicks, nothing about the greater good.
So cyclists have never caused death or injuries on the roads? Hmm ok then.

He once cycled through a red light and gave the video of himself doing it to the Police knowing full well they might fine him for it. Given that cyclists cause less than 1% of the pedestrian deaths that motorists do it should be obvious why he concentrates on motorists. Being hit by a car is at least 20 times worse than being hit by a cyclist. A >1.5 ton car carries a lot more momentum!

Besides, how are you supposed to report a reckless cyclist (who has no number plate) to the Police? You would have to arrest them, which you cannot do as a citizen, unless they have just committed an indictable offence. Arguing with them would be pointless and in some cases possibly dangerous.

Except it would likely be far more effective a deterrent to quietly report these people to the police with his video evidence - so they end up with points & a fine (e.g. something which actually affects them) - rather than shouting at them and shoving a camera in their face where the most they probably take away from the encounter is "WTF was wrong with that nutcase?" rather than realising their own actions were to blame.

That's exactly what he does. There are thousands of successful prosecutions of motorists thanks to his video evidence. Maybe he became frustrated with watching people committing motoring offences with impunity and putting the lives of others at risk?
 
Actually, that's a cynical misrepresentation by the right-wing media of what happened. He did not intentionally push his expensive (legal EAPC) bike into the car. He was trying to get himself and his bike into the middle of the lane quickly to block the car from continuing to drive the wrong way up the lane. He believed that the car would then stop and have to reverse back to the queue. Cars are supposed to give way to pedestrians. If you watch the videos of similar incidents on his YouTube channel you will see he regularly uses this strategy.

I take it you've not seen the 3rd party video clearly showing him propel the bike and let go. A video shot by a 3rd party that Van Erp later posted an image on his social media of the person's face in a veiled attempt to dox the guy.

He has two sons, so not sure why you think he is gay?

Plenty of gay men have fathered children, usually in an attempt to conceal their sexuality. Probably one of the most famous and recent being Philip Schofield.

He's come close:

Which was later proven in court that Van Erp jumped on the bonnet, not 'run over' as he claimed and it was dismissed.

Besides, how are you supposed to report a reckless cyclist

He could remonstrate them like he does with motorists. But he doesn't. He's a hypocrite. Plus if reported, a description of the offender can be used if officers witness further offences.

That's exactly what he does. There are thousands of successful prosecutions of motorists thanks to his video evidence. Maybe he became frustrated with watching people committing motoring offences with impunity and putting the lives of others at risk?

Reporting drivers is fine. Causing a confrontation whilst recording for views on YouTube, that's all ego.
 
Actually, that's a cynical misrepresentation by the right-wing media of what happened. He did not intentionally push his expensive (legal EAPC) bike into the car. He was trying to get himself and his bike into the middle of the lane quickly to block the car from continuing to drive the wrong way up the lane. He believed that the car would then stop and have to reverse back to the queue. Cars are supposed to give way to pedestrians. If you watch the videos of similar incidents on his YouTube channel you will see he regularly uses this strategy.

He just underestimated the recklessness of the motorist and then could not stop his heavy bike without getting hit himself. In fact, he narrowly missed being hit himself. After that the driver should have stopped, but he just drove off. Why would he deliberately push his expensive EAPC, loaded with his possessions, in front of a car when he knew it could not stop? The motorist drove at him deliberately (on the wrong side of the road past several "No Entry" signs) and actually accelerated as it approached him.

Nah though somewhat correct the driver clearly committed to coming through before Mikey put his bike into the vehicle's path - by the time he pushed the bike out it was pretty clear short of the other driver emergency stopping a collision was going to happen. I can't support what the driver did but for all Mikey knew that driver may have had some exception to the no entry although normally exceptions are signed at the point of no entry but still.

For example we had similar roadworks through the village I live in where they also closed a single track lane which ran parallel to the works with no through access and no entry signs but the TRRO letter we had as residents said we could use it despite the signage.

Albeit in this case I suspect most if not all of that traffic had no reason to be going through the closure.
 
Back
Top Bottom