Other places likely aren't compliant with the letter of the act, the issue of who is actually behind the ID is another problem again and why some have been saying how bad the OSA is.
I've only seen the ofcom guidance page, that just says you need robust age verification and here is a non-exhaustive list of what is and isn't ok (debit cards not being ok for example). So as long it's robust, it should be fine even if it's not on the list
If an email that can easily exchange hands is somehow perfectly ok, then why would account age not be ok as well? That's just as robust as "email that has been floating around for years with the possibility of changing hands" as an estimate.
Yes, but the point is the age of the account is not proof of age for the person using it.
That’s like saying a learner driver must be really experienced if they drive a 15 year old Fiesta.
I’m not arguing it’s a great idea, just the logical failure to assume an account that is 20 years old must be owned or used by an adult over 18.
Exchanging Steam accounts is against the tos, they are non transferable so they shouldn't be being transferred anyway and Valve can ban accounts if they suspect it.
But the same failure applies to literally everything else. A credit card on file isn't proof the account is actually being used by someone over 18, it proves nothing more than a card is on file. Same for any method of verification, they all fall down at "whoever verified it isn't necessarily who uses it", that's not unique to account age.
Last edited: