Monitor reviews are a minefield.....

Our very own @Baddass ( TFTCentral) been reading it for years, Rting and Hardware Unboxing are all very good. I used all 3 to find the perfect OLED for me as a first OLED screen. Im very happy with what I got from reading those sites.
 
TFTCentral the one I use but agree with @humbug monitors are far more subjective view of the reviewer than the spec a lot of the time. A lot of them are swung into positive reviews by addons, gadgets, nonsense addons and not the panel itself sometimes. The focus really should be the screen for the vast majority of the score. If the review spends less time on quality, clarity, reflection etc than on the USB hub, stand and what the back of the monitor looks like - it's generally a bad sign IMHO.
 
Might want to wait a little bit, Gsync Ultimate screens are due later this year or earlier next year I think?

Also, I didn't think my screen had an issue but I do get that black screen that lasts a couple of seconds sometimes, changed to different DP cables and no difference.. it's the LG 27GP950, I heard it was/is an issue with Nvidia drivers as well. Annoying. Almost impossible to pinpoint the issue
It's because of DSC right? That monitor is 160hz - so 160hz at 4k means you have to use DSC to reach that refresh rate. DSC, with Nvidia cards pre 5000 series, have black screen alt-tab issues between fullscreen applications.

Does that monitor have a DSC toggle? You could run it over HDMI 2.1 at 4k120hz with DSC off and you'd avoid all of the black screen issues.

Or - swap to an AMD GPU or a newer 5000 series GPU from Nvidia and that'll also help sort it!
 
Talking about reviews, I was recently looking at a monitor review at the rainforest, and all was looking good until I realized that the review was for a completely different model to the one I was looking at. Why do they lump different model reviews on the specific model I am looking at? Its not useful at all
Thats amazon for you they do that for everything its barely worth looking at reviews there because you can't be sure its for the item you're buying
 
Last edited:
i do want a VA panel as they have much better black levels than IPS, they are the best panels for that behind OLED with contrast ratios of 3000:1 or even 4000:1 where as IPS seem to top out at 1000:1 and to me look washed-out in comparison.
You should look at IPS panels with FALD and mini LEDs. When using the local dimming you will get contract ratios like those on OLED. For example, my monitor has 1,152 zones and is HDR1000 certified. Before I bought this one I made the mistake of going for a cheaper 32" 1440P VA curved. I hated it and returned it for this model. 32" at 1440p was not sharp. VA was ghostly and smeary when gaming. And curved just gave me a bad head with my astigmatism. Like you, I really don't get it. Flat panel all the way for me. :)
 
Might want to wait a little bit, Gsync Ultimate screens are due later this year or earlier next year I think?
My mistake - I meant to say Gsync Pulsar, could be promising.
It's because of DSC right? That monitor is 160hz - so 160hz at 4k means you have to use DSC to reach that refresh rate. DSC, with Nvidia cards pre 5000 series, have black screen alt-tab issues between fullscreen applications.

Does that monitor have a DSC toggle? You could run it over HDMI 2.1 at 4k120hz with DSC off and you'd avoid all of the black screen issues.

Or - swap to an AMD GPU or a newer 5000 series GPU from Nvidia and that'll also help sort it!
It seems to happen randomly I think, though I have noticed it shortly after Windows turning off the display, then coming back on (maybe within some minutes or so), sometimes when mousing over something in Edge. I have seen some suggest moving to HDMI fixes it but also saw someone on Reddit claim it didn't make any difference, could be a combination of drivers/monitor issue I suppose. Might be worth giving HDMI a go though. Yes I'm using a 4090, but I don't have any intentions of moving to a 5000 series yet.. I might not change until the 6000 cards or whatever AMD has at the time. By then I might be using a newer monitor anyway if something noticeably better comes along.
 
Last edited:
I tend to think if a monitor isn't on RTINGS, TFT Central etc, its not worth bothering with in the first place.
 
I pretty much solely read tftcentral.co.uk cross referenced with techpowerup.com if possible.

I would mention I’ve returned more monitors than I can remember because some haven’t come close to reproducing some review results. This along with the ever increasing ropey standards tech journalists and aweful quality control makes buying monitors a real PITA.
 
Its hard tho not impossible to find a good one and if you're looking for specific panel reviews it gets even harder.

Something to bear in mind is what the reviewer can do with the monitor after the review. Maybe they have to return it, maybe they’re allowed to give it away, maybe they’re allowed to keep it. But if they’re allowed to sell it on then you really need to ask yourself if the review is a review or an advert.
 
There's only one way to see if a monitor is right for you really, 30 day trial from a retailer. You have monitors out there that every review gives an 8/10 on or whatever but that one little detail no reviewer ever talks about stands out to you when it's on your desk and that could be a deal breaker. Most reviewers have a list of stuff to review so need to turn reviews around without hanging around on finer details so you never know about them until you buy the highly rated model and get it home to realise you either put up with it or return it.

As for curved, very few flat ones out there now, stick to 1800R models if you can for a subtle curve that doesn't distract the viewing experience and it's nearly as good as flat, at 32" 1800R is actually useful in that there's less "hunting" with the eyeballs at the far reaches anyway, anything smaller than 1800R and I find it too curved and also gives an optical illusion of distortion when working on productivity stuff.
 
Back
Top Bottom