Is this why Intel share price has just rocketed?
Yes
Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.
Is this why Intel share price has just rocketed?
Why do you want it to be game over for AMD?
The last time AMD didn't do so well we basically had quad cores for a decade and Intel locking out overclocking for most chips.
Also this pretty much ends Arc too,so even less competition in the dGPU market.
As usually on a hobbyist and gaming forum, people are probably attaching a far too high importance to the gaming market.
This is mostly about other things.
Server chips, server GPUs, AI, AI, AI etc.
Looking patriotic to very unpredictable American administration which loves to wave flags.
Laptops, distantly followed by desktops are very likely a very distant focus.
Plus at this point $5 billion is pocket change to Nvidia.
As for this driving down prices due to increased competition? Well have Nvidia ever reduced pricing? Have Intel ever embraced competition?
Using NVlink to lock down server CPUs and GPUs is a far more likely thing. Latter do the same for desktop GPUs. That might get scrutinized by monopolies commissions worldwide. The American regulators well be almost totally toothless by then, the others might throw obstacles in the way.
Now what this means for Intel ARC and their GPU efforts? Nothing good but current Intel CEO was probably going to axe most of that anyway regardless of this.
Also implies that Nvidia's ARM dreams may be over soon. Despite them pouring billions into them over the years.
noAre/should we expect something so soon?
It took amd/Radeon the best part of a decade to get something sensible into the market...
yep, a business arrangement. All to do with GPU / CPU link. Intel / Nvidia have agreed to bury the hatchet as Nvidia needs to expand Nvlink aka x86 CPU's.As usually on a hobbyist and gaming forum, people are probably attaching a far too high importance to the gaming market.
This is mostly about other things.
Server chips, server GPUs, AI, AI, AI etc.
Looking patriotic to very unpredictable American administration which loves to wave flags.
Laptops, distantly followed by desktops are very likely a very distant focus.
Plus at this point $5 billion is pocket change to Nvidia.
As for this driving down prices due to increased competition? Well have Nvidia ever reduced pricing? Have Intel ever embraced competition?
Using NVlink to lock down server CPUs and GPUs is a far more likely thing. Latter do the same for desktop GPUs. That might get scrutinized by monopolies commissions worldwide. The American regulators well be almost totally toothless by then, the others might throw obstacles in the way.
Now what this means for Intel ARC and their GPU efforts? Nothing good but current Intel CEO was probably going to axe most of that anyway regardless of this.
Also implies that Nvidia's ARM dreams may be over soon. Despite them pouring billions into them over the years.
maybe AMD should wait for Intel to catch up then?Not sure it's the end of AMD as they currently have the console industry sown up and their APUs are very well established. It certainly spices the industry up though, and with AMD starting to make very good gpus again and now this collaboration between Intel and Nvidia, we will likely see some very powerful consoles, laptops and APUs.