I'm not a plumber so I have no clue about testing the whole system after installing a PRV. That's the plumber's job and that's what I'm paying him to do. I would have happily paid whatever it cost for him to check the rest of the system complied with the new mains pressure but he neglected to even give it a second thought which is just really poor. He just fitted the PRV and left me with an unbalanced system and potential damage to my pipework.It depends on the size of the original bill, and whether it was just for fitting the PRV, or fitting it and then testing the whole system.
They can't be expected to have the right cartridge immediately on hand, as there are too many of them. So for this, he's done the best he can in the time available.
As for the tap, that was just a side effect of the lower pressure showing up a weak part so I don't hold him accountable for that at all. But I do think it's ridiculous that now it's apparently unreasonable to expect a plumber to fix a tap properly and you just have to make do with whatever he's got on his van and still pay full price for the 'fix'?
The tap issue wasn't an emergency. If I'd known I was going to get charged full price for him to 'make do' with what he had in his van and eventually have to fix it myself then I would have insisted he went away and came back another time with the right part because then I'd happily pay for the work.
I've paid it now anyway, cba with the hassle. But I stand by that it's unfair and the expansion vessel at least should have been checked when the PRV was first fitted.
Last edited: