Mass shooting at Bondi beach Australia

Im not a national security advisor. However it is a frequent trend that ALL of the attacks these days we hear that same line, 'known to security agencies'.

The Manchester synagogue attacker wasn't known to security services, his father was an international surgeon, two brothers who have successful professional careers with what seems a perfectly normal decent early life. Who knows why this 1 brother got radicalised into taking the action he did.

Being 'known to security services' can mean a lot of things, it doesn't just mean a potentially imminent terrorist, real life isn't like Minority Report!

I suppose the thing is we don't always hear about most of the attacks that do get disrupted - look at the one in Germany the other day - but we always hear about the ones that don't, so it gives a distorted view on their efficacy. As the adage goes, the police have to succeed every time, the terrorists only need to once.
 
Last edited:
Looking at further footage, it appears that the person who disarmed one of the guys, allowed him to retreat ? meaning the shooter retrieted back to the footbridge with the other shooter and re-armed?
 
Looking at further footage, it appears that the person who disarmed one of the guys, allowed him to retreat ? meaning the shooter retrieted back to the footbridge with the other shooter and re-armed?
Well maybe he didn't want to shoot him, not everyone is capable of doing that. He did get shot by the one on the bridge too.
 
Looking at further footage, it appears that the person who disarmed one of the guys, allowed him to retreat ? meaning the shooter retrieted back to the footbridge with the other shooter and re-armed?

With sirens sounding from all directions and reports of gun fire, I believe he placed the gun down against the tree to avoid being shot by police, or attacked by those around him.
 
The Manchester synagogue attacker wasn't known to security services, his father was an international surgeon, two brothers who have successful professional careers with what seems a perfectly normal decent early life. Who knows why this 1 brother got radicalised into taking the action he did.

Being 'known to security services' can mean a lot of things, it doesn't just mean a potentially imminent terrorist, real life isn't like Minority Report!

I suppose the thing is we don't always hear about most of the attacks that do get disrupted - look at the one in Germany the other day - but we always hear about the ones that don't, so it gives a distorted view on their efficacy. As the adage goes, the police have to succeed every time, the terrorists only need to once.

His father was an "international surgeon" who openly praised Hamas and Iran on his social media pages. Also what's an international surgeon? Lol.
The attacker himself had an appalling record of crime and is well known to police. He was on bail at the time! The mosque he attended had been under investigation for its teachings as had the Imam.
 
With sirens sounding from all directions and reports of gun fire, I believe he placed the gun down against the tree to avoid being shot by police, or attacked by those around him.

I'm wondering how many on here would have the balls to wrestle a shotgun (I assume) from an attacker and the wherewithal to drop the attackers with an unfamiliar weapon, after being shot at and injured. It's not like CoD
 
**** sake that really annoys me.

Look at the people, not the guns.


You understand that gun control doesn't just ban guns, right?

It restricts who can own them, under which circumstances and puts in place more stringent checks. They literally look at the people before saying yeah nah mate, you can have a gun.
 
Clearly I'm referring to your other posts where you are always seem willing to defend the killing of Palestinians (including women and children) by the IDF.



You are straw manning to a ridiculous degree there.

I'm saying that I think it's reprehensible for Netanyahu to publicly blame these killings on Australia recognising the need for a Palestinian state, which most countries agree is part of the path to a lasting peace. You know, to try and end the cycle of violence. Seems either dishonest or extremely naive to somehow believe that Israel laying waste to Gaza and killing 70,000 people (and continuing to annexe the West Bank) could not have had anything to do with motivating extremists to stage such an attack.
And I am saying you, @dirtychinchilla and @jpaul are Islamist terror apologists. You are dangling the strawman for everyone to see. Want to talk about dishonest or naive to blame Israel/Gaza for the Jihadi attack on Jews celebrating a religious holiday 9000 miles away?

Try and explain to all of us how Israel was involved in the truck attacks on the Christmas markets in Germany (Magdeburg 2014, Berlin 2016). How about explaining Nice in 2016? What about London 2017? Barcelona 2017? How about Charlie Hebdo office and then the Jewish shops in Paris 2020? Was Israel involved there too? In the same way that the aforementioned attacks were perpetrated on Western values, this attack was perpetrated on Jews for merely being Jews not because of Israel. That is anti semitic in nature.

The problem is people who seem to excuse Israel's justified reaction to terror attacks on a terror base as the reason for Jihadi extremists to attack Jews. They do not need any additional reason to attack Jews. Nor Christians. Nor indeed any other faith, ethnicity or creed including their fellow Muslims who happen to either belong to a different branch or just happened to get in the way. Paraphrasing BN, this Muslim Brotherhood extremist ideology (with all of it's offshoots) is a cancer and it needs to be attacked and dismantled with resolve and determination...not the weak pathetic platitudes we have been seeing over the last couple of decades.

Freedom of speech comes with great responsibility. If I had a Ukrainian cousin killed in the war, would people excuse my firebombing a Russian orthodox church in London as an inevitable consequence and easily explained away? Have we seen any useful idiots here marching in the streets waving Russian flags and chanting "From Moscow to Lviv, the Russian empire again will live".

"Free Palestine", "Stop the War", "End the killing" is acceptable. "From the River", "Globalise the Intifada" and "Death to the IDF" is not. Statutory 2 year sentence. Repeat offence, 5 years etc. The global finance networks supporting the terrorism. Massive fines. Companies broken up. Guilty parties imprisoned mandatory 10 years+. Extremist leaders? Hunted down and terminated. If a country in which they are taking refuge refuses to cooperate, their borders are just deemed transparent anyway and sanctions put in place. Resolve. Strength. When there is no safe place to hide and potential attackers realise that their families will face deportation (if dual nationals), loss of state benefits and sale of all assets to fund terror victims, these things have a habit of resolving themselves. Otherwise, it is a matter of time before we are subjected to more frequent and deadly attacks around the world.


Are you a comedian?

Local jewish communities, like the sacked members of the uk board of deputies attempt, need to condemn/dissociate themselves with the actions of Israeli state.

I heard both the chief rabbi's discussion today on radio 4 which did not mention such pragmatism, also interviews with uk jews who said we should not be blamed for that,
but don't have the insight to condemn it.
Why? Are WASPS in the UK condemning or apologising for DJT? Not in my name! What about Catholics from Ireland? Are they condemning Nicolas Maduro to prevent attacks from the UVF? What about Anglicans right here? Anyone of them had to condemn or apologise for the actions taken by GHWB in the first Gulf War to not be expected to field off attacks in the UK? Two countries 9000 miles apart. The only thing shared is a religion. If Jews in Australia are responsible for Israeli actions, then WASPS here are responsible for DJT and his policies.

And to be perfectly clear, this is not an attack on Muslims. For the record, I have yet to meet or work with a bad one in my personal life. This is an attack on extremism in all it's forms, whether Jihadis. Christian fundamentalists or Jewish extremists. And those who condone or excuse actions undertaken by these groups.
 
You are in support of state-sponsored terrorism from Israel, so I'm not sure you have a leg to stand on.

I think the problem you're referring to is that the leaders of the Jewish community are not distancing themselves from the war crimes carried out by Israel. Unfortunately for Jews, Israel is claimed to be the land of the Jews, so they will get tarred with the same brush.

If Jews globally denounced the actions of Israel, I think we'd have a different opinion.

And for the record, I hate all religions more or less equally.
 
I see Australian Labor are now talking about stricter gun control laws, rather than addressing the elephant in the room. Sad and predictable.
What's the political equivalent of Reform in Australia? I have some bets to place.

Why would a member of the public require a high powered rifle in Australia? There are no bears of other large threats to justify a larger calibre. .22 rimfire is plenty for hunting/pest control and wouldn't cause the damage that these rounds did. Also why was someone licenced to have 6 firearms?
 
Exactly what i said earlier in the thread. These things aren't crimes of passion. Theyre planned and prepared. If they dont have guns they'll use knives, bombs, cars, lorries.

With that logic why not just allow people to have fully automatic assault rifles?

Just imagine how many more people would be dead with just semi automatic rifles. You will never stop these events unless you ban all guns which isn't going to happen but you can restrict access to the most dangerous guns. Banning certain firearms has clearly worked in Australia as it has in the UK.

2 men with knives aren't killing 15 people and injuring 20+
 
With that logic why not just allow people to have fully automatic assault rifles?

Just imagine how many more people would be dead with just semi automatic rifles. You will never stop these events unless you ban all guns which isn't going to happen but you can restrict access to the most dangerous guns. Banning certain firearms has clearly worked in Australia as it has in the UK.

2 men with knives aren't killing 15 people and injuring 20+

A single person with a knife has killed more than that.
These men used shotguns and a bolt action rifle. Not ARs.
The London and Manchester attackers used bombs. London Bridge was vehicles and knives. Manchester synagogue knives and a vehicle. I can go on if you'd like?
 
Why would a member of the public require a high powered rifle in Australia? There are no bears of other large threats to justify a larger calibre. .22 rimfire is plenty for hunting/pest control and wouldn't cause the damage that these rounds did. Also why was someone licenced to have 6 firearms?

Not that I'm in favour of people being allowed to own guns without a good reason and proper controls. But tell us again how you humanely took down that 6 foot tall kangaroo and that massive salt water crocodile with a .22 rimfire rifle?
 
Not that I'm in favour of people being allowed to own guns without a good reason and proper controls. But tell us again how you humanely took down that 6 foot tall kangaroo and that massive salt water crocodile with a .22 rimfire rifle?

Generally by running away.
 
I see the Americans have foiled a terrorist attack that was to take place on Christmas Eve. Another Palestine supporters group.
Security services around the world must be getting a bit twitchy now with Christmas nearly here.
 
Back
Top Bottom