From his perspective, being 'more than just about money' may just be about the principle of being paid what he thinks he has owed and now being dodged. It doesn't necessarily mean 'violent vengeance' is incoming, though I would expect a confrontation.
Needing to 'be right' is always such a downfall in relationships, friendships and with colleagues. You can be 100% right in a situation but sticking to that can lead to an imperfect or even 'bad' outcome.
Dodging the calls and then refusing to engage has evidently caused further annoyance and 'made it worse'. The whole thing has an air of being avoidable.
Why do you think he's threatening to come round to OP's house on Christmas Eve when OP is celebrating Christmas with his family. He's not coming to sing carrols, it's clearly a not so subtle threat
Yes - it’s a threat of an in person confrontation on the basis that the OP has refused to engage with him.
It’s of minor importance but if you re-read the post, which of course is a recollection, then the other party has said he’ll see him on the first day that the OP has mentioned being free from work (Wednesday). Only then the OP then mentioned about his family.
Yes - it’s a threat of an in person confrontation on the basis that the OP has refused to engage with him.
It’s of minor importance but if you re-read the post, which of course is a recollection, then the other party has said he’ll see him on the first day that the OP has mentioned being free from work (Wednesday). Only then the OP then mentioned about his family.
Where do you live? I'd be more than happy to tell him to **** off for you![]()
Or we could all do the full monty scene where we are all in our pants in the ops house when his mate comes round.Better yet, lets organise a drunken overclockers get together outside this guys house together and all tell him to **** off together on Christmas Day
Anyone who is serious about getting money that they are owed and thinks that they are being ignored, isn’t going to announce when they are coming over as it gives the other party a chance to magically not be at home.From his perspective, being 'more than just about money' may just be about the principle of being paid what he thinks he has owed and now being dodged. It doesn't necessarily mean 'violent vengeance' is incoming, though I would expect a confrontation.
Needing to 'be right' is always such a downfall in relationships, friendships and with colleagues. You can be 100% right in a situation but sticking to that can lead to an imperfect or even 'bad' outcome.
Dodging the calls and then refusing to engage has evidently caused further annoyance and 'made it worse'. The whole thing has an air of being avoidable.
We turning this in to pay per view?I’ve asked.
Hopefully he can live stream on Wednesday.
This is just intimidation, he wants OP to be thinking about the potential confrontation in the hopes that it will scare him into paying.
Yes, or possibly, he’s happy to let the OP dwell on that uncertainty.
If he has a genuine belief he’s been cheated, whether reasonable or not, the he doesn’t really have any choice other than taking it to the OP in person asap, noting OP has told him he’s not willing to discuss it any further. Unfortunately, you can’t just brick wall a determined person… especially if they are unreasonable.
But how do we know he'd get the message and stop?I value my time far more than money. £120 is a small amount to no longer receive the comms and nonsense OP is being subjected to.
I'm sure you and your bicycle pedalling will terrify me...
This sage person speaks the truthAnyone who is serious about getting money that they are owed and thinks that they are being ignored, isn’t going to announce when they are coming over as it gives the other party a chance to magically not be at home.
Also I’m assuming OP doesn’t live at his place of work. If he really wanted to talk to him face to face he could have just wait outside his house.
This is just intimidation, he wants OP to be thinking about the potential confrontation in the hopes that it will scare him into paying.
A week or so later, communication went a bit quiet. Then he messaged asking if the project was finished. I replied that it was, and mentioned I’d been busy with work. He then told me I owed him £120 for that Saturday.
It was presented as helping out
I’ve never charged him for similar or greater help
Am I wrong for standing my ground here?