Paedo walks free after admitting to 24 sex abuse charges

8igdave said:
As far as im aware yes it is. How can you say it is not true when you have no idea of the incident.



Look at it this way. If you put spikes on the top of your wall but they arnt visible. If a theif tries to break into your house by going over the wall and stabs them selves up. YOu get sued!

I know the theif did suffer some injuiries but i couldn't say what. But i know they were enough for him to build a law case against his uncle and yes he did win compensation. Which is why his uncle now always leaves his lights on in his shop now.

And at the guy who said its a friend of a friend. Well mmm, i dont own a shop. I dont know many people that do own shops therefore its highly likely its going to be a friend or a friend of a friend. In this case my friends uncle.


YOu people are to quick to try and dismantle other peoples posts to make your selves look supiriour (geeze i cant spell!) when you know nothing of what happened.

Yes, that's all good and well, but how do YOU know that your mates uncle isn't having you and him on?
 
Tru said:
It's not even 9am and already I'm OUTRAGED! :mad:


Its almost 12.30pm and im still flipping OUTRAGED!!!!:mad:

This country and its justice system is nothing more than a joke simply put. The mans a danger whether hes had rehab or not and to let him go just like that is simply shocking...even after his own sister said hes not safe to be on the streets. Also shows just how stupid these JWs are as well, to stand by a known paedophile and support him...disgusting behaviour:(.
 
Freeman said:
Yes, that's all good and well, but how do YOU know that your mates uncle isn't having you and him on?

Would you joke about that?

Secondly they arnt the sort to joke about those things and he seemed very ****** off about it.

Also, why live my life going mmm do i trust my friends?
 
8igdave said:
As far as im aware yes it is. How can you say it is not true when you have no idea of the incident.



Look at it this way. If you put spikes on the top of your wall but they arnt visible. If a theif tries to break into your house by going over the wall and stabs them selves up. YOu get sued!

I know the theif did suffer some injuiries but i couldn't say what. But i know they were enough for him to build a law case against his uncle and yes he did win compensation. Which is why his uncle now always leaves his lights on in his shop now.

And at the guy who said its a friend of a friend. Well mmm, i dont own a shop. I dont know many people that do own shops therefore its highly likely its going to be a friend or a friend of a friend. In this case my friends uncle.


YOu people are to quick to try and dismantle other peoples posts to make your selves look supiriour (geeze i cant spell!) when you know nothing of what happened.

Alright you give us the name of the thief and the court it took place in, I'd be happy to examine the court records.
 
8igdave said:
As far as im aware yes it is. How can you say it is not true when you have no idea of the incident.

Because it's crap. It makes no sense. How the hell would that even go to court?

8igdave said:
Look at it this way. If you put spikes on the top of your wall but they arnt visible. If a theif tries to break into your house by going over the wall and stabs them selves up. YOu get sued!

That isn't comparable to a thief falling over because he couldn't see.

8igdave said:
I know the theif did suffer some injuiries but i couldn't say what. But i know they were enough for him to build a law case against his uncle and yes he did win compensation. Which is why his uncle now always leaves his lights on in his shop now.

His Uncle probably leaves them on to help prevent break ins. Have you ever wondered why shops across the country have lights on at night? It's not because they've been sued by burgulars who couldn't see what they were doing. It's because it's a strong deterrent. The shop is lit up, a thief is illuminated to anybody who cares to take a glance in the window.

8igdave said:
YOu people are to quick to try and dismantle other peoples posts to make your selves look supiriour (geeze i cant spell!) when you know nothing of what happened.

Because it's nonsense. If I told you that my car runs on chicken crap, would you just accept it as true? It makes no sense.

Newflash: ridiculous stories will usually get dismissed.
 
I support iCraigs opinion. Too much crap about OMG THE WORLD IS RUBBISH and OMG MY MATE SAID and OMG THE COUNTRY IS DOWN THE PAN these days.

Get a grip, get some perspective and realise that to a certain degree, the world has always sucked.

You think our justice system is a 'joke'?

Take a look at our justice system in the 1800's!
 
Im bored of arguing over this now. I do infact beleive the friend who told me this comes on this forum. Why dont i get him to tell you what happened ;)

Although ive not seen him on in a while. I shall talk to him when i see him on msn and come back to you.
 
8igdave said:
Im bored of arguing over this now. I do infact beleive the friend who told me this comes on this forum. Why dont i get him to tell you what happened ;)

Although ive not seen him on in a while. I shall talk to him when i see him on msn and come back to you.




I did just contact him on msn. He said to me that yes it is all true.

His explanation was something to do with the laws of people having accidents on your property and you being responsible for it. Like if the postman breaks his fingers in your letterbox or something lol (random example). Now you see how its true?

He said he cant be bothered in aruging pointless arguments because you people will never admit your wrong. To be honest its true you wont.



Im sure you people will all gooo ooo sure he said that. But i will keep horasing him untill he does post on here if i have to lol. But you would say that because youd rather say that then admit your wrong.
 
THIS COUNTRY IS GOING TO THE DOGS.

But in all seriousness, this is bloody outrageous.
 
Last edited:
i say cut off his genitalia, then get a large african-american to have his way with them, while he slowly bleeds to death.
 
Last edited:
8igdave said:
Im sure you people will all gooo ooo sure he said that. But i will keep horasing him untill he does post on here if i have to lol. But you would say that because youd rather say that then admit your wrong.

His explanation makes no sense. A postman is permitted to deliver items to your property. A burglar is not permitted to break into your house and therefore, you have no legal requirement to ensure his safety when on the premises.

I don't really care if your mate on MSN comes on here, there is no way on Earth a man got sued by a burglar because the man had the lights off in his house and the burglar tripped and injured himself. It's just a tale told and passed around by the funny story crowd to provoke conversation.

I've lost count of how many variants I've heard. My Dad's Robot's Uncle's Half sister in law had X happen on her property and the burglar sued them for X amount and won! Yadda yadda yadda. :)
 
Last edited:
Pfft, you'd be no fun down the pub - you're supposed to pretend to believe these stories and reply with an equally far-fetched story :p
 
Back
Top Bottom