Man of Honour
What is the range like on good quality drones?
Said it before and i'll say it again. There needs to be new and widely announced regs on "drones". This will only get worse.
Maybe based on size, power etc.
What is the range like on good quality drones?
How can you even catch someone flying a drone near an airport? I feel like you'd need another drone to do that
5km typically.
Licensing drone use seems entirely sensible. But there is no way that can safeguard airline jets from people attacking them with drones, laser pointers etc. Airlines need to be made more durable and protect against these sorts of attacks.
Do we have any actual evidence it was a drone of any variety yet? I don't know how fast those planes are going at that point in the flight cycle but I would struggle to identify a "drone" at high speed, especially if I was concentrating on something else, say, landing a plane.
I think the current hysteria around these things may well lead to people mistakenly identifying things as a drone when it actual fact, they could be something like those stupid helium filled foil balloons you can buy.
It's impossible to identify a who is flying a drone unless you actually catch them at it at the time. Especially if it is thousands of little pieces spread over a large area after being hit by a plane. This is why people are so cocky about it at the moment, they know there is little chance of recrimination unless they are stupid enough to post it in a video on youtube.
Whilst regulation is great and the US system should work in principle, they have to register guns and there are definitely a lot of unregistered ones of the those kicking around stateside. You won't stop someone getting hold of the parts to build one (a drone) if they want to.
GPS geofencing is pointless as you don't need GPS to fly a Multi (or a plane for that matter)
As for terrorist functionality, you would need a fairly large multirotor to carry "a couple of pounds of explosives" and the flight time would be relatively short as a result. DJI s1000 size at least probably. You'd be better off with an RC Plane - much better payload and efficiency.
To be honest, I'm very surprised that the technology hasn't already been used in some sort of terrorist operation - RC planes with good payloads and great video/control range have been around longer than multirotors.
Kind of makes me wonder if threats to our national security are exaggerated for some purpose or another.
I haven't read through all 5 pages - but what stops someone equally flying a RC areoplane into a landing jumbo jet? a Drone and a RC Plane can get quite abit of heigh and distance... unfortunatly you get idiots in this world who think these kind of things are clever but i guess it highlights a security breach.
Nothing stops them doing that at the moment, it can literally happen at any time
How can you even catch someone flying a drone near an airport? I feel like you'd need another drone to do that
There's nothing really stopping them being used for terrorism at the moment is there?
You can pick it up on radar, if you have the right one. Serious interest in micro-drone detecting radar from a number of governments both for counter-terrorism and for counter-eijit use.
Even a small plastic toy has an appreciable radar return at short range.
Because it is still a development area and there are issues with ponying up the cash required... It isn't there yet, but the principle is sound.Nobody has the right one though.
At present that's not available and it's not about to be any time soon.
Snip