Hillsborough inquest verdict.

Status
Not open for further replies.
Soldato
Joined
13 Aug 2010
Posts
3,114
I mentioned in the thread in the Football Stadium, it's shocking how successful their smear campaign was. So many people are unaware that Lord Justice Taylors initial report back in 1990 cleared supporters and pointed the finger at the police for the disaster - they still chose to believe the lies spread through that ****rag.

You can keep saying it until you're blue in the face - some people have already made their minds up on their version of the truth, much like the Sun at the time.

Even after 2 formal reviews and the responsible people / organisations being called out - why are posters coming in here and spouting their **** ?

Is disrespectful to those who lost their lives and the families they left behind
 
Caporegime
Joined
29 Jan 2008
Posts
58,912
No one seems to have answered me yet, why were the barriers installed at the edge of the pitch in the first place? I imagine to stop football fans entering the pitch which wouldn't be necessary if football fans could be trusted to behave appropriately. Most concerts I've been to/seen have only had waist height barriers and these were without issue. What was it which demanded the use of crush barriers at Hillsborough?

because unfortunately some of the 'fans' were complete scum and would fight each other - three years earlier some Liverpool 'fans' caused this disaster:

 
Caporegime
Joined
30 Jun 2007
Posts
68,784
Location
Wales
No one seems to have answered me yet, why were the barriers installed at the edge of the pitch in the first place? I imagine to stop football fans entering the pitch which wouldn't be necessary if football fans could be trusted to behave appropriately. Most concerts I've been to/seen have only had waist height barriers and these were without issue. What was it which demanded the use of crush barriers at Hillsborough?

Crush barriers are the waist high barriers in the standa to stop the people at the front being crushed by everyone behind (breaks it up into sections) they had been there since before ww2.
 
Soldato
Joined
8 Mar 2007
Posts
10,938
But it's these strawman arguments that aren't helping. Where on this thread has anyone solely blamed the fans? Where has anyone written a post in the style of that famous Kelvin McKenzie piece? No where I can see.

When you keep dragging this back to a binary argument that's basically "unless you put 100% of the blame onto the police then you are 100% blaming the fans" we can't get anywhere.

This isn't black and white and the way I see what we have now being discussed is whether the police/authorities were 100% to blame or 99% to blame with anyone taking the latter position being made out to be a heartless scum bag who has some kind of contempt for the grieving relatives.

You can keep saying it until you're blue in the face - some people have already made their minds up on their version of the truth, much like the Sun at the time.

Even after 2 formal reviews and the responsible people / organisations being called out - why are posters coming in here and spouting their **** ?

Is disrespectful to those who lost their lives and the families they left behind

Point proved
 
Soldato
Joined
20 Oct 2002
Posts
17,909
Location
London
Is disrespectful to those who lost their lives and the families they left behind
If I were the family of a policeman at that game that did nothing but attempt to save lives then I would find it extremely disrespectful to have people saying things like 'the police deserve what they get'. It swings both ways :rolleyes:

Like we said, nothing is black and white. Football fans seem to be the best at forgetting that.
 
Caporegime
Joined
30 Jun 2007
Posts
68,784
Location
Wales
Have you seriously never been in crowds like this before? People use their whole body weight and push/surge forward. Also add to the fact it's a cup final that has started and people are wanting to go watch their team.

So your saying people are using thier full body weight to push forward to force thier way forward because they want to watch thier team.

So conciously using force against the people in front of them.


But its not thier fault?
 
Soldato
Joined
19 Feb 2007
Posts
3,717
Location
UK
because unfortunately some of the 'fans' were complete scum and would fight each other - three years earlier some Liverpool 'fans' caused this disaster:


I do remember this but at the time i didn't really keep up with it much as i was young.

What actually happened after this regarding blame, prosecutions etc, that video is shocking.
 
Caporegime
Joined
30 Jun 2007
Posts
68,784
Location
Wales
The jury said it was not their fault, when asked the direct question as part of their assessment of the evidence which took 2 years for them to review.

Maybe you can fund the appeal to see if a new jury can reach a different outcome ?

You realise a jury isnt some collection of super beings its just normal people right?

Were all the answers unanimus?
 
Associate
Joined
7 Nov 2013
Posts
255
Location
Kent, England
Crush barriers are the waist high barriers in the standa to stop the people at the front being crushed by everyone behind (breaks it up into sections) they had been there since before ww2.

My mistake, I meant the large 8ft+ fence separating the crowd from the pitch, if that were at waist height people would have been able to escape instead of being penned up like prisoners/animals. The fact this fence was deemed a necessity is the fault of nobody but those hooligans, thus some of this can be attributed to them.
 
Last edited:
Soldato
Joined
2 Aug 2012
Posts
7,809
So your saying people are using thier full body weight to push forward to force thier way forward because they want to watch thier team.

So conciously using force against the people in front of them.


But its not their fault?

Reading through this, I do find myself wondering how the question put to the Jury was actually interpreted by them.

a) Were the supporters who died partially responsible for their own deaths or not? (But excluding the possibility that other supporters, say the ones outside trying to get in, might have been) Y/N

or

b) Were any supporters partially responsible for the deaths (Including the supporters who were outside trying to get in) Y/N

The distinction is a fairly important one!
 
Associate
Joined
23 Nov 2009
Posts
1,195
If I were the family of a policeman at that game that did nothing but attempt to save lives then I would find it extremely disrespectful to have people saying things like 'the police deserve what they get'. It swings both ways :rolleyes:

The Police as an institution probably do deserve what they get. That doesn't mean that many officers on the ground didn't do a pretty good job at the time given the instructions and information on the day. It seems to have been primarily a command and control failure, down to key senior officers.

But so many of them did alter statements and conceal evidence. Any institution (public or private) that goes to such lengths to shift blame and hide the truth is rotten to the core. Where are the policemen who stood up and told the truth because it was the right thing to do? Who put integrity ahead of toeing the party line?

This is far from the only example - banking and car manufacturers being two others that spring to mind. Cultural corruption.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom