14 year old daughter and 16 year old boyfriend.

Status
Not open for further replies.
Soldato
Joined
27 Jan 2009
Posts
6,563
Replace the ages in the title of this thread with and races and QED you realise OP is ageist.


Are you a spokesperson for an organisation like PIE or NAMBLA? Or just trolling because comparing age and race in this fashion is puerile?

The reason for which should be obvious... Being a child is a phase that all adults regardless of race have passed through... And being a child involves some rather universal aspects which include physical and emotional immaturity compared to adulthood (excluding some very acutely disabled people who may not develop significant greater emotional capacity but for whom there are specific provisions in law to regulate sexual activity) People don't generally have stages where they pass through different races in a similar manner....

Therefore substituting race for age in such a way as to imply an equivalence of (unjust/ unwarranted) discrimination is rather daft
 
Associate
Joined
21 Oct 2012
Posts
2,332
Are you a spokesperson for an organisation like PIE or NAMBLA? Or just trolling because comparing age and race in this fashion is puerile?

The reason for which should be obvious... Being a child is a phase that all adults regardless of race have passed through... And being a child involves some rather universal aspects which include physical and emotional immaturity compared to adulthood (excluding some very acutely disabled people who may not develop significant greater emotional capacity but for whom there are specific provisions in law to regulate sexual activity) People don't generally have stages where they pass through different races in a similar manner....

Therefore substituting race for age in such a way as to imply an equivalence of (unjust/ unwarranted) discrimination is rather daft
The urge for people to virtue signal on the internet is strong.

Also spot the paedos in this thread
 
Soldato
Joined
10 May 2012
Posts
10,062
Location
Leeds
had a talk with her then with them both together seems ok no sex.if he has sex with her he is breaking the law.all seems ok a bit of respect both ways?

As if you'll find out if they've slept together. You can't do anything about what they choose to do, seriously. I wasn't allowed to have girls sleep over, what that meant was that I had to sneak them in and out in the middle of the night.
 
Associate
Joined
21 Oct 2012
Posts
2,332
16 and 14 is not okay. If they're just dating then that's fine but any kind of sexual contact, even just kissing and cuddling is not actually legal.

Personally I'm against putting teenage girls on the pill, it just encourages them to go ahead and have unprotected sex. Sex has consequences and teens need to understand this.
 
Soldato
Joined
25 Jun 2011
Posts
5,468
Location
Yorkshire and proud of it!
If he is a decent person who treats her well and is responsible, I'd be grateful for small mercies and be happy. If anything, a 16 year old is likely to be more mature and treat her better than a younger boy. I don't think the ages are problematic in themselves, just so long as he treats her well and she is confident and independent enough to set the boundaries she is comfortable with.

I would make sure she understands that:
  • Abortion is not a contraceptive.
  • If she DOES have unprotected sex, not to be embarrassed and hope, but to talk to you about getting the morning after pill or an IUD.
  • He should use condoms if she doesn't have an IUD.
  • Porn is not a model for real sex.
The Pill is likely to come up. Personal opinion but I would not recommend it. Especially for a young girl. It can mess with you in several ways including how sexual attraction works for you. IUD or condoms.

Note, it may help if you avoid making any eye-contact during this conversation and deliver most of it staring out of the window and just assume she's probably still there.
 
Soldato
Joined
30 Apr 2006
Posts
17,960
Location
London
Interesting as anyone at school at 16 dating a 14 year would have the **** taken out of them non-stop!

Totally, "Cradle-snatcher" was thrown at you if you were dating anyone younger than a few months than you. Which was sad, when i was 16 i wanted to date this (just turned) 15 year old, she was so much prettier and nicer (in personality) than any of the girls in my year and we got on like a house on fire, but the pressure from all her friends and mine meant she stood me up on our first date. I didn't know why at the time.

20 years later we bumped into each over in Facebook and we got chatting again, the old chemistry was back again. I asked her why she stood me up and she told me about the "Cradle-snatcher" label was not only coming from my side but her friends too. They were wiered out by me being older and basally pressured her into standing me up. She admitted to me that was one of her biggest regrets in life was standing me up and that she saw what a nice guy i was and wanted to be with me, but if she did her friends would have ostracised her.

By that point i was already dating this lovely girl so i had to turn her down when she asked me out again (admittedly she had two kids at this point and piled on like 100 lbs) lol
 
Soldato
Joined
1 Apr 2014
Posts
18,634
Location
Aberdeen
the boy seems ok.he has a job.the thing is my sister had a baby at 14 same kinda circumstances.my daughter aint silly either.she is a boxer and quite aware of stuff.

Perhaps it might be time to invite your sister round for a talk?

BTW she being 14 years and 1 month with he being 16 years and 11 months is very different to her being 14 years and 11 months with him 16 years and 1 month.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom