If he doesn't like a brand image then he doesn't like it, he doesn't need to justify it.
Any movement of the watch causes an element of wear and tear, that's a fact. From what I have read it doesn't make too much difference whether you use a watch winder or whether you wind as needed... it is more for convenience sake than anything else.I had read that having to wind it every time could cause extra wear and tear. Guessing that as long as you're not smashing it round with no sympathy then you're fine?
I'd stick with this also. Watch winders make sense in terms of minimising wear if you don't have a quick set date function on an auto due to the wear caused by cycling through all the dates necessary to get to 'today's' date. For all other instances (bar some perpetual calendars and probably some other ludicrously awesome complications), I'd stick with hand winding.That's what I was thinking. Hand winding it is. Thanks.
Not sure if serious.
It's basically mickey mouses hands on an otherwise plain and uninspiring watch, its about as far away from horological and sartorial elegance as you can get. Looks absolutely ridiculous.
Why does it say 90 on it? Maybe the other comments have made me focus on this but it’s just the usual style. I expect it looks better with the metal strap unfolded.maybe the novelty would wear off ... are Nixon form/£200 over function ? not sure if hands are luminous.
We’re not allowed to sell watches but if we were
