• Competitor rules

    Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.

Forza Horizon 4 Bench Thread

ShiWarrior said:
to me, its his CPU @ 4.2

i got around that with my cpu @ 3.5

EDIT //

Hmm actually his GPU looks overclocked, maybe on water?
Click to expand...

Not got anything special going on, just an overclocked MSI GTX 970 4G. I'll see if I can run another benchmark and see what it comes up with.

I'm going to say it's the other 2's processors though.

Although I suppose that doesn't explain why that 1060 is so much lower as well.
 
Last edited:
@Kaapstad

So I was curious myself, so I ran another few Benchmarks. Now the Benchmarks I did originally were on the full game, but I had that on a Xbox Game Pass Trial, so these benches are from the Demo, which is a slightly older game version. Also using the newer Nvidia Drivers (416.94) and it actually ran faster. (For all these runs I restored default settings in the Nvidia control panel, just in case there was a strange setting)

6gLeydN.png

I then ran another on my cards stock settings which is 1328/3500 vs the overclocked 1553/4000 and it's still not much slower:

mrXyYG2.png

Also knocked my CPU back to stock settings, so 3.4ghz with the base turbo and power limits set, vs 4.2ghz all core turbo and it doesn't seem to make any difference.

Lt4pRG6.png


It has to just be the CPU's the other two are using, if you look at the CPU Render results, mine are a decent amount higher.
 
Last edited:
Arron17 said:
@Kaapstad

So I was curious myself, so I ran another few Benchmarks. Now the Benchmarks I did originally were on the full game, but I had that on a Xbox Game Pass Trial, so these benches are from the Demo, which is a slightly older game version. Also using the newer Nvidia Drivers (416.94) and it actually ran faster. (For all these runs I restored default settings in the Nvidia control panel, just in case there was a strange setting)

6gLeydN.png

I then ran another on my cards stock settings which is 1328/3500 vs the overclocked 1553/4000 and it's still not much slower:

mrXyYG2.png

Also knocked my CPU back to stock settings, so 3.4ghz with the base turbo and power limits set, vs 4.2ghz all core turbo and it doesn't seem to make any difference.

Lt4pRG6.png


It has to just be the CPU's the other two are using, if you look at the CPU Render results, mine are a decent amount higher.
Click to expand...

Just realised what is going on.

There is an RX580 on the board above your 970, they are normally close to a 1060.

I think what has happened is the settings are filling up the 3gb VRAM on PiKe 1060 and holding it back.

I have updated the scoreboard with your new run.:)
 
Arron17 said:
@Kaapstad

So I was curious myself, so I ran another few Benchmarks. Now the Benchmarks I did originally were on the full game, but I had that on a Xbox Game Pass Trial, so these benches are from the Demo, which is a slightly older game version. Also using the newer Nvidia Drivers (416.94) and it actually ran faster. (For all these runs I restored default settings in the Nvidia control panel, just in case there was a strange setting)

6gLeydN.png

I then ran another on my cards stock settings which is 1328/3500 vs the overclocked 1553/4000 and it's still not much slower:

mrXyYG2.png

Also knocked my CPU back to stock settings, so 3.4ghz with the base turbo and power limits set, vs 4.2ghz all core turbo and it doesn't seem to make any difference.

Lt4pRG6.png


It has to just be the CPU's the other two are using, if you look at the CPU Render results, mine are a decent amount higher.
Click to expand...
This comparison shows the 1060 3gb on its back foot because it's missing 128 shaders in addition to the 3gb of memory. I can't see there being much difference between 2nd and 3rd gen i5.
 
1080p
Vega64 @ 1752/1180
ThreadRipper 1950X @ 4.0
18.11.1 Drivers

ForzaH4-Bench1752-1180-Results.jpg
 
Got a new Benchmark to add. VEGA64 running 1556/1000 @ 1V. Using drivers 18.11.2. Looks like now with the high stutter count and the fact it's only 84% GPU limited. The 3570k can't do much more.

dqixTr2.png
 
Benchmark results with the GTX 1070 Ti instead of the GTX 970.

1080p
GeForce GTX 1070 Ti @ 1860/2003
FX-8350 @ 4.0 GHz
417.35 Driver

g2CyoJF.jpg

1440p
GeForce GTX 1070 Ti @ 1860/2003
FX-8350 @ 4.0 GHz
417.35 Driver

3v9AglQ.jpg

3440x1440
GeForce GTX 1070 Ti @ 1860/2003
FX-8350 @ 4.0 GHz
417.35 Driver

gm32cpA.jpg
 
PS - Only got the game yesterday not played it yet. Ill probs run with 4x msaa and fxaa on for the sake of it if its that easy to run if its not needed at 4k!

What are ya'll doing?
 
1080p
2080TI @ 2065ish/+750 mem
417.35 Driver



1440p
2080TI @ 2065ish/+750 mem
417.35 Driver



Nice to see that my CPU is not hurting me really, dulls the itch to buy a 9900k when It doesnt look like it will make a difference for games.
Suprised how good this looked at 1080p though!! I suppose with 8x msaa and being upscaled it should do
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom