1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.

Forza Horizon 4 Bench Thread

Discussion in 'Graphics Cards' started by Kaapstad, Sep 29, 2018.

  1. Arron17

    Gangster

    Joined: May 10, 2012

    Posts: 197

    Location: Leeds

    Not got anything special going on, just an overclocked MSI GTX 970 4G. I'll see if I can run another benchmark and see what it comes up with.

    I'm going to say it's the other 2's processors though.

    Although I suppose that doesn't explain why that 1060 is so much lower as well.
     
    Last edited: Nov 17, 2018
  2. Arron17

    Gangster

    Joined: May 10, 2012

    Posts: 197

    Location: Leeds

    @Kaapstad

    So I was curious myself, so I ran another few Benchmarks. Now the Benchmarks I did originally were on the full game, but I had that on a Xbox Game Pass Trial, so these benches are from the Demo, which is a slightly older game version. Also using the newer Nvidia Drivers (416.94) and it actually ran faster. (For all these runs I restored default settings in the Nvidia control panel, just in case there was a strange setting)

    [​IMG]

    I then ran another on my cards stock settings which is 1328/3500 vs the overclocked 1553/4000 and it's still not much slower:

    [​IMG]

    Also knocked my CPU back to stock settings, so 3.4ghz with the base turbo and power limits set, vs 4.2ghz all core turbo and it doesn't seem to make any difference.

    [​IMG]


    It has to just be the CPU's the other two are using, if you look at the CPU Render results, mine are a decent amount higher.
     
    Last edited: Nov 17, 2018
  3. AMB73

    Gangster

    Joined: Sep 25, 2017

    Posts: 149

    Location: Essex

    2160p
    2080ti @ 2085/7500
    7700k @ 5.0
    416.94 Drivers

    [​IMG]
     
    Last edited: Nov 17, 2018
  4. Kaapstad

    Man of Honour

    Joined: May 21, 2012

    Posts: 27,662

    Location: Dalek flagship

    Just realised what is going on.

    There is an RX580 on the board above your 970, they are normally close to a 1060.

    I think what has happened is the settings are filling up the 3gb VRAM on PiKe 1060 and holding it back.

    I have updated the scoreboard with your new run.:)
     
  5. Kaapstad

    Man of Honour

    Joined: May 21, 2012

    Posts: 27,662

    Location: Dalek flagship


    For the score board you need to have

    Motion Blur quality on Ultra
    FXAA On
     
  6. AMB73

    Gangster

    Joined: Sep 25, 2017

    Posts: 149

    Location: Essex

    Re-submission
    2160p
    2080ti @ 2085/7500
    7700k @ 5.0
    416.94 Drivers

    [​IMG]
     
  7. Kaapstad

    Man of Honour

    Joined: May 21, 2012

    Posts: 27,662

    Location: Dalek flagship

    Scoreboard updated.:)
     
  8. PiKe

    Capodecina

    Joined: Oct 18, 2002

    Posts: 23,649

    Location: Lake District

    This comparison shows the 1060 3gb on its back foot because it's missing 128 shaders in addition to the 3gb of memory. I can't see there being much difference between 2nd and 3rd gen i5.
     
  9. TrixX

    Gangster

    Joined: Oct 4, 2017

    Posts: 438

    Location: Australia - Sunshine Coast

    1080p
    Vega64 @ 1752/1180
    ThreadRipper 1950X @ 4.0
    18.11.1 Drivers

    [​IMG]
     
  10. Kaapstad

    Man of Honour

    Joined: May 21, 2012

    Posts: 27,662

    Location: Dalek flagship

    Scoreboard updated.:)
     
  11. Arron17

    Gangster

    Joined: May 10, 2012

    Posts: 197

    Location: Leeds

    Got a new Benchmark to add. VEGA64 running 1556/1000 @ 1V. Using drivers 18.11.2. Looks like now with the high stutter count and the fact it's only 84% GPU limited. The 3570k can't do much more.

    [​IMG]
     
  12. Arron17

    Gangster

    Joined: May 10, 2012

    Posts: 197

    Location: Leeds

    Here's one for 1440p as well, same settings as above.

    [​IMG]
     
  13. Kaapstad

    Man of Honour

    Joined: May 21, 2012

    Posts: 27,662

    Location: Dalek flagship

    Scoreboard updated.:)
     
  14. Vexr

    Hitman

    Joined: Oct 15, 2018

    Posts: 590

    Benchmark results with the GTX 1070 Ti instead of the GTX 970.

    1080p
    GeForce GTX 1070 Ti @ 1860/2003
    FX-8350 @ 4.0 GHz
    417.35 Driver

    [​IMG]

    1440p
    GeForce GTX 1070 Ti @ 1860/2003
    FX-8350 @ 4.0 GHz
    417.35 Driver

    [​IMG]

    3440x1440
    GeForce GTX 1070 Ti @ 1860/2003
    FX-8350 @ 4.0 GHz
    417.35 Driver

    [​IMG]
     
  15. seanyc5

    Hitman

    Joined: Nov 30, 2011

    Posts: 808

    2160p
    2080TI @ 2065ish/+750 mem
    417.35 Driver

    Settings look good to me, I think..
    [​IMG]
     
  16. seanyc5

    Hitman

    Joined: Nov 30, 2011

    Posts: 808

    PS - Only got the game yesterday not played it yet. Ill probs run with 4x msaa and fxaa on for the sake of it if its that easy to run if its not needed at 4k!

    What are ya'll doing?
     
  17. Kaapstad

    Man of Honour

    Joined: May 21, 2012

    Posts: 27,662

    Location: Dalek flagship

    Scoreboard updated.:)
     
  18. seanyc5

    Hitman

    Joined: Nov 30, 2011

    Posts: 808

    1080p
    2080TI @ 2065ish/+750 mem
    417.35 Driver

    [​IMG]

    1440p
    2080TI @ 2065ish/+750 mem
    417.35 Driver

    [​IMG]

    Nice to see that my CPU is not hurting me really, dulls the itch to buy a 9900k when It doesnt look like it will make a difference for games.
    Suprised how good this looked at 1080p though!! I suppose with 8x msaa and being upscaled it should do
     
  19. Kaapstad

    Man of Honour

    Joined: May 21, 2012

    Posts: 27,662

    Location: Dalek flagship

    Scoreboard updated.:)
     
  20. Kaapstad

    Man of Honour

    Joined: May 21, 2012

    Posts: 27,662

    Location: Dalek flagship

    Titan RTX @2100/4100
    6950X @4.0
    2160p
    417.35 Drivers

    [​IMG]