• Competitor rules

    Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.

Quake 2 Raytraced! with Q2VKPT and Valkun

Caporegime
Joined
18 Oct 2002
Posts
39,316
Location
Ireland
And this gives a good example of why raytracing is still years off, a game from 22 years ago getting under 60fps in some instances on nvidia's ti. Would be interesting to see how bfv would run if they done this level of RT, 2-5fps maybe?
 
Soldato
Joined
5 Sep 2011
Posts
12,816
Location
Surrey
And this gives a good example of why raytracing is still years off, a game from 22 years ago getting under 60fps in some instances on nvidia's ti. Would be interesting to see how bfv would run if they done this level of RT, 2-5fps maybe?

This is full path tracing. Path tracing is monumentally more computational than a simple ray tracer. Hence why the author is impressed enough that it works at all. In addition, there is a minimum of 4 rays being cast per pixel at any given time. That's double the number that NVIDIA has been quoted as using for its current real-time hybrid implementations.
 
Last edited:
Caporegime
Joined
18 Oct 2002
Posts
39,316
Location
Ireland
This is full path tracing. Path tracing is monumentally more computational than a simple ray tracer. Hence why the author is impressed enough that it works at all. In addition, there is a minimum of 4 rays being past per pixel at any given time. That's double the number that NVIDIA has been quoted as using for its current real-time hybrid implementations.

And at the minute all nvidia are doing is reflections, when they start going global illumination as well as reflections there's likely going to be a far bigger hit than just reflections alone. So again, performance going down for visual improvements that are barely noticeable, going to be a hard sell.
 
Soldato
Joined
5 Sep 2011
Posts
12,816
Location
Surrey
And at the minute all nvidia are doing is reflections, when they start going global illumination as well as reflections there's likely going to be a far bigger hit than just reflections alone. So again, performance going down for visual improvements that are barely noticeable, going to be a hard sell.

That statement is at odds with itself, as the more rendering purposes you replace rasterisation with ray tracing, the more visual benefit there will be (in time).
 
Soldato
Joined
26 Sep 2010
Posts
7,157
Location
Stoke-on-Trent
Dear God, what's with all the grumpy gits in here? We all know the ray tracing in the RTX series is woeful but that's not what this is about. 4 rays per pixel in a fully path traced environment running at 60fps is a glorious thing! The ball is rolling now, developers are able to start genuinely playing with real time tracing and (more or less) they have the hardware to be able to take these first steps.

We got to start somewhere. We'd all prefer that starting point wasn't a grotesque abuse of position and greed, but nonetheless it's a start.
 

HRL

HRL

Soldato
Joined
22 Nov 2005
Posts
3,028
Location
Devon
Watching that video brought back memories of playing that for the first time. Even recognised some of the level design, which isn't bad considering how old it is or how shabby my memory is.

However, it still looks crap, RT or not. :p
 
Don
Joined
20 Feb 2006
Posts
5,227
Location
Leeds
Dear God, what's with all the grumpy gits in here? We all know the ray tracing in the RTX series is woeful but that's not what this is about. 4 rays per pixel in a fully path traced environment running at 60fps is a glorious thing! The ball is rolling now, developers are able to start genuinely playing with real time tracing and (more or less) they have the hardware to be able to take these first steps.

We got to start somewhere. We'd all prefer that starting point wasn't a grotesque abuse of position and greed, but nonetheless it's a start.

Well put, not sure what people expect to see with the technology in its infancy. We have to start somewhere.
 
Caporegime
Joined
24 Sep 2008
Posts
38,322
Location
Essex innit!
Dear God, what's with all the grumpy gits in here? We all know the ray tracing in the RTX series is woeful but that's not what this is about. 4 rays per pixel in a fully path traced environment running at 60fps is a glorious thing! The ball is rolling now, developers are able to start genuinely playing with real time tracing and (more or less) they have the hardware to be able to take these first steps.

We got to start somewhere. We'd all prefer that starting point wasn't a grotesque abuse of position and greed, but nonetheless it's a start.
Spot on. I wish others would see it this way and whilst NVidia are charging stupid money, it is a start and yer, 60 fps at 1440P is laughable but when you consider what is being done, it gives me some real hope that the future is coming quickly.
 
Mobster
Soldato
Joined
4 Apr 2011
Posts
3,501
Dear God, what's with all the grumpy gits in here? We all know the ray tracing in the RTX series is woeful but that's not what this is about. 4 rays per pixel in a fully path traced environment running at 60fps is a glorious thing! The ball is rolling now, developers are able to start genuinely playing with real time tracing and (more or less) they have the hardware to be able to take these first steps.

We got to start somewhere. We'd all prefer that starting point wasn't a grotesque abuse of position and greed, but nonetheless it's a start.

Woeful ? It's only implemented in 1 game and you're getting 60-70fps @ 4k with RT on and everything maxed. What's woeful about that ?
 
Back
Top Bottom