Oh no no no, not at all! And I don't mean argument in the shouty sense, I mean general standpoint.
In the various Navi threads here there's a strong opinion that AMD will charge Nvidia money for Navi because that's where the price point precedent is set. I've argued that would be sales suicide for AMD and they should undercut Nvidia by a good amount to swing sales in their favour. The idea being if a Navi card and its targeted RTX competitor perform the same in traditional raster workloads but Navi costs the same or is only a little bit below then consumers will just pay the little bit extra and get RTX because of the ray tracing and DLSS, regardless of if it works or not.
And you said exactly that
So let me ask you this as well: if Radeon VII was £100 cheaper than RTX 2080, would you still get the RTX because "might as well get RT"?