• Competitor rules

    Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.

The Radeon RX 5700 XT Owners Thread.

BriT said:
would hope so the 1080 is 4 years? old? lol
Click to expand...

Ehm sorry but July 2016 the GTX1080 was barely 2 month old, and there was none AIB in stock......
That's 3 years not 4, and we haven't gone anywhere in performance since then. :)

As for crazy pricing, true, but who forgot the £800 GTX1080s due to stock shortages, a good year before the mining craze.
 
Holding on for the 5800/5900's tbh, these just aren't much of a jump over V64 for me (when Vega driver gimping has been factored in).

Perfect for 480/580 owners though!! :p
 
Zernath said:
Assuming they release a 5800 or 5900 of course, which they probably will, but when is the question.
Click to expand...

There's always a faster card in the works, or companies would quickly go out of business. It's not probably that they'll release a faster Navi card, it's inevitable.

The RX5700 is a mid range card. It will be replaced by a high end Navi card, once which will take the performance crown from Radeon VII. I look forward to upgrading to one from my Radeon VII :)
 
Zernath said:
I don't think we're getting the old pricing structure back mate, the mining craze and Nvidia's greed have seen to that. :(
Click to expand...

Yeah that's not really bothering me, just want a bloody 60CU Navi ;) :D

The pricing thing is more to do with the masses of stock available, everytwhere seem to have all models in and plenty of them which is a tad unusual for a new launch! Either the blower is hurting sales or the price is, and I'm betting it's more to do with the pricing.
 
JediFragger said:
The pricing thing is more to do with the masses of stock available, everytwhere seem to have all models in and plenty of them which is a tad unusual for a new launch! Either the blower is hurting sales or the price is, and I'm betting it's more to do with the pricing.
Click to expand...

I'm not sure, blowers are hardly popular these days are they. I went for one because I wanted to refund my Radeon VII, and having sold my Vega 56 would have been left without a GPU. A partner card would have been preferable, but it is what it is.
 
Dave2150 said:
There's always a faster card in the works, or companies would quickly go out of business. It's not probably that they'll release a faster Navi card, it's inevitable.

The RX5700 is a mid range card. It will be replaced by a high end Navi card, once which will take the performance crown from Radeon VII. I look forward to upgrading to one from my Radeon VII :)
Click to expand...

Same here, For now my VII does all I want it too admirably & I know the amount of memory it has won't ever be an issue like it was with my Fury Pro so there's no need to rush.
 
For the money I'm impressed, 1080 cost me a lot more.

That said I take back anything nice I said about the blower, session on wows this evening and it can get loud enough to be annoying. Roll on August and the waterblock.
 
How are you guys getting on undervolting your 5700 XTs? I've been able to reduce mine down to 1060mV at the stock max-clock of 2059MHz and 786mV @ 1429MHz without any artifacting. Can't really say if it's drastically reduced temps but I've also already done the GamersNexus washer & paste mod.

Card now gets up to 78℃ "temperature" and 95℃ "Junction Temperature", hovering at about 1700MHz

Oh, and here's it getting a little naked time while I was doing the GN mod:
pwFcP8e.jpg
 
Th0nt said:
Waiting for @Martini1991 extended testing on the pad to see if mission was successful or not.
Click to expand...

Sore subject right now I'm afraid :p

Right now it's back with the stock cooler.

At one point I had it benching with clocks of 2100Mhz at 69c

The PAD wasn't what I thought it was.
I've ended up ripping that in two by accident.....
Like paper.

It was easy water-cooling two 6870s!
 
Last edited:
Undervolt runs.

With boost clock set to 2060mhz, Power default, VRAM Default. Fan Auto.

2060mhz TimeSpy runs:

1059mv - OK - GS - 9408
1056mv - OK - GS - 9421
1050mv - FAIL
1041mv - FAIL
1032mv - FAIL
1020mv - FAIL

1904mhz TimeSpy runs same settings:

979mv - OK - GS - 8882
949mv - OK - GS - 8864
945mv - OK - GS - 8878
940mv - FAIL
935mv - FAIL
925mv - FAIL

1429mhz TimeSpy runs same settings:

786mv - OK - GS - 7070
774mv - OK - GS - 7076
768mv - OK - GS - 7092
750mv - OK - GS - 7096
735mv - OK - GS - 7108
725mv - OK - GS - 7108
700mv - OK - GS - 7089
682mv - slider won't go any-lower - OK - GS - 7083.

Validated result: https://www.3dmark.com/spy/7845652

Temp/Power readings at 682mv -

pWSXxHa.jpg

For reference -

5700 XT (2165-2200 Bench Clock Approx 300W) - 9720
1080ti GTX FE Stock - 9497
5700 XT (1905mhz 945mv 115w-120w approx.) - 8878
Vega 64 Stock - 7423
5700 XT (1429mhz 682mv 75w-85w approx.) - 7083
1080 GTX FE Stock - 6867
1070 GTX FE Stock - 5896.

Looks like we found the next playstation 5 part, 1080GTX performance at sub-100W.

Shadow Of The Tomb Raider Benches - 1429mhz 682mv 75w-85w approx.

1080p - High - GPU Score - Min 86, max 179, 111fps average, 95% 94fps
1080p - Highest - GPU Score - Min 72, max 153, 96fps average, 95% 79fps
1080p - OCUK Forum Ultra - GPU Score - Min 42, max 101, 56fps average, 95% 45fps (Leaderboard Score 8912 frames, fps 57)

for 1440p - Observed small power spikes into the low 90w range and then back down again.

1440p - High - GPU Score - Min 61, Max 112, 76fps average, 95% 65fps
1440p - Highest - GPU Score - Min 50, Max 97, 64fps average, 95% 54fps
1440p - OCUK Forum Ultra -GPU Score - Min 29, Max 63, 39fps average, 95% 31fps
(Leaderboard Score 5922 frames, fps 38)

Shadow Of The Tomb Raider Benches - 1904mhz 945mv 115w-120w approx.

1080p - OCUK Forum Ultra - GPU Score - Min 52, max 122, 72fps average, 95% 55fps (Leaderboard Score 10793 frames, fps 70)

Observed spikes to 135w for 1440p

1440p - OCUK Forum Ultra -GPU Score - Min 36, Max 76, 48fps average, 95% 38fps
(Leaderboard Score 7241 frames, fps 47)

Superposition OCUK Forum Settings

1904mhz 955mv - fan/pl default (needed a voltage bump for 1080p to pass 1440p run fine on multiple runs)

1080p - 4992 min 30.25/avg/37.34/max/44.40
1440p - 2895 min 19.12/avg/21.65/max/24.91

2060mhz 1058mv -fan/pl default (needed a voltage bump for 1440p to pass 1080p run fine)

1080p - 5337 min 32.43/avg/39.92/max/47.30
1440p - 3083 min 19.50/avg/23.06/max/26.56

1429mhz 682mv - fan/pl default

1080p -
1440p -

Overvolt Results - Superposition

2155/875 1250mv - fan 100% pl 90% 73C 278W

1080p - 5529 min 33.19/avg/41.36/max 49.69

2155/875 1225mv - fan 100% pl 90% 73c 278w

1080p - 5547 min 33.51/avg/41.49/max 49.49

2155/875 1999mv - fail
2195/875 1225mv - fail
2195/875 1250mv - fail
2195/875 1260mv - Superposition pass 5450
2260/875 1282mv - firestrike standard pass, firestrike extreme fail
2260/875 1294mv - firestrike extreme fail
2260/875 1310mv - firestrike extreme fail
2240/875 1273mv - firestrike extreme pass, timespy standard fail
2204/875 1273mv - timespy pass, timespy extreme pass, firestrike ultra pass, heaven pass, cloud gate pass, valley pass
 
Last edited:
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom