not watching then
-
Competitor rules
Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.
OcUK Ampere RTX3000 series review thread
- Thread starter CAT-THE-FIFTH
- Start date
not watching then
How and why did she go mental? Curious, as you're right, she never appears on camera anymore...
Edit: Nevermind, something about an "Awakening" on her channel, around Jan 2017.
Last edited:
Associate
- Joined
- 1 Dec 2007
- Posts
- 275
Me too.
Although I was tempted to get a cheap second hand 2080 ti if under £450 as it would still have been a decent upgrade from the 1080 ti I sold for £350.
Absoloutely
Caporegime
- Joined
- 30 Jul 2013
- Posts
- 30,146
Surprisingly to me, the Asus TUF gaming was much better cooled than the FE, running 5-6% faster
However, overclocking was seemingly pointless.
However, overclocking was seemingly pointless.
- Joined
- 9 Nov 2009
- Posts
- 25,762
- Location
- Planet Earth
I have updated the second post with AIB models grouped by OEM.
- Joined
- 9 Nov 2009
- Posts
- 25,762
- Location
- Planet Earth
Added RTX3090 reviews.
Seems there is some instability on some cards and that Igor has been digging:
https://www.igorslab.de/en/what-rea...tabilities-of-the-force-rtx-3080-andrtx-3090/
https://www.igorslab.de/was-wirklic...80-und-rtx-3090-stecken-koennte-investigativ/
Super-secrecy didn't help (Igor was one of the ones before launch saying the board partners only had this nvpower hog software rather than drivers to test their cards), but in the end the bill of material guide was vague too and seems to have said that they can / could MLCC or POSCAP capacitors...
Looks like the Asus tax is justified for once as Igor points they used all MLCCs.
Zotac and Gigabyte are the penny pinchers once again.
So thanks to the W1zzard over at TPU, we can see who did and didn't:
all MLCCs:
two MLCCs:
one MLCCs:
no MLCCs:
https://www.igorslab.de/en/what-rea...tabilities-of-the-force-rtx-3080-andrtx-3090/
https://www.igorslab.de/was-wirklic...80-und-rtx-3090-stecken-koennte-investigativ/
Super-secrecy didn't help (Igor was one of the ones before launch saying the board partners only had this nvpower hog software rather than drivers to test their cards), but in the end the bill of material guide was vague too and seems to have said that they can / could MLCC or POSCAP capacitors...
Looks like the Asus tax is justified for once as Igor points they used all MLCCs.
Zotac and Gigabyte are the penny pinchers once again.
So thanks to the W1zzard over at TPU, we can see who did and didn't:
all MLCCs:
- https://www.techpowerup.com/review/asus-geforce-rtx-3090-strix-oc/3.html
- https://www.techpowerup.com/review/asus-geforce-rtx-3080-tuf-gaming-oc/3.html
two MLCCs:
- https://www.techpowerup.com/review/nvidia-geforce-rtx-3080-founders-edition/4.html
- https://www.techpowerup.com/review/msi-geforce-rtx-3090-gaming-x-trio/3.html
one MLCCs:
no MLCCs: