• Competitor rules

    Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.

Intel Arc Gameplay Trailer | The Game Awards 2021 | Intel Graphics

Intel GPUs is one of these things people won't get too hyped for, because it's hard to believe that we'll have a legitimate 3rd player for gaming GPUs until it's actually on a store shelf
 
I really hope Intel knock it out of the park with this, We need a 3rd company in play to bring the prices back down to sane levels, Both AMD and Nvidia have gotten immensely greedy, I just hope Intel don't follow suit as I can see the ever increasing prices of GPU's eventually being detrimental to the long term health of the PC gaming market.
 
I really hope Intel knock it out of the park with this, We need a 3rd company in play to bring the prices back down to sane levels, Both AMD and Nvidia have gotten immensely greedy, I just hope Intel don't follow suit as I can see the ever increasing prices of GPU's eventually being detrimental to the long term health of the PC gaming market.
Based on past practice when Intel dominated the cpu market they excelled at greed. Minor cpu increments annually, charge a premium, stick with 4 cores mainstream and change the socket frequently to force motherboard changes with most generation updates. Doubt they would change their habits.
 
Based on past practice when Intel dominated the cpu market they excelled at greed. Minor cpu increments annually, charge a premium, stick with 4 cores mainstream and change the socket frequently to force motherboard changes with most generation updates. Doubt they would change their habits.

The hope is based on Intel not having a dominant position in the dGPU market. Completely the opposite - they currently have a 0% market share and they're going up against a well established duopoly. Maybe, just maybe, Intel will be willing and able to bring viable budget and midrange cards to market in adequate quantities and at high (rather than extremely, ludicrously high) prices. That would be a viable route to greater profit by taking market share. It wouldn't require Intel suddenly not being greedy. 50% of the market at a smaller margin can be more profit than 5% of the market at a bigger margin. Bigger market share can be useful in establishing a brand, which can be useful in future profits. Massive amounts of free positive advertising also helps increase profit. Likewise for a highly positive image amongst potential customers. If Arc is competitive up to 3070/6700 levels and is available in quantity at around the MSRP for comparable nvidia and AMD cards, Intel will be the knight in shining armour riding to the rescue of PC gaming. Every hardware site in the world will be rushing to talk about it and everyone will be praising them. And buying their products. And seriously considering buying a future generation of dGPUs in their next upgrade. Lots of profit for Intel to be had that way, present and future.

Intel GPUs is one of these things people won't get too hyped for, because it's hard to believe that we'll have a legitimate 3rd player for gaming GPUs until it's actually on a store shelf

I agree. At the moment, all we have is speculation about performance and a vague possible release date period. That's nothing to care much about. If I see hard performance data, genuine availability rather better than "you get a small chance occasionally if you have alerts set and you can drop everything at an instant's notice to buy immediately and you get lucky" and pricing that's not at a level even a scalper would be embarassed about charging, then I'll care. Until then, it may as well be a unicorn riding a dragon.
 
I agree Intel have been greedy monsters for a long time and they've been anti competitive and have stifled innovation but any 3rd player is to be welcomed. Intel is keeping AMD honest in the CPU space despite being on an ancient if incredibly efficient for it's antiquity process. A fourth player would be great too. Nvidia and AMD have a duopoly and if Intel want traction in the GPU space they'll at least need to begin with something competitive in terms of price/performance. Knowing Intel they'll probably try and charge a premium over the other two but hopefully consumers will knock them back. I'm sort of pleased my 4K monitor broke so 1080ti is fine for 1080p. This time next year hopefully things will be better.
 
Based on past practice when Intel dominated the cpu market they excelled at greed. Minor cpu increments annually, charge a premium, stick with 4 cores mainstream and change the socket frequently to force motherboard changes with most generation updates. Doubt they would change their habits.

While true for the most part you have to remember Intel have 0% of the dedicated GPU market so they need to entice customers and they won't do that if they are the same prices as AMD and Nvidia with what is essentially a beta test GPU as is normal for any 1st gen product.
 
10% cheaper for the same performance doesn't look like going for the jugular.

Unless, Intel's MSRP is actually close to street price of course.

Still, Intel have a lot to prove with drivers. For me, it would be no good to have a card which varies from 90% to 110% of a 3070/6700, costs 10% less but whose performance is only true for 2021+ onward blockbusters.
 
According to gamermeld 10%+ cheaper than nvidia with better performance

Sounds good but we will see


Just type " Gamer Meld" in google and see what gets suggested... Clickbait channel with made up rubbish... That's not a source to use or believe... Some silly youtuber that creates nothing but clickbait and made up stories or uses other clickbait channels "info" and media to copy the clickbait from.

Use a real tech source channel. :rolleyes:

Gamer Meld are as useful as this guys clickbait channel :-

G1C3dLe.gif
 
I haven’t seen anything that looks promising on these Arc GPUs that suggests they will upset the established Apple dart.

the arc has to be at least 60% of the current equivalent GPU costs for it to be marginally successful.

it’s OpenGL so driver needs to be polished. But likely not and will not have much optimisation in a lot of games.

Tho it might be quite interesting as mining cards.
 
I agree Intel have been greedy monsters for a long time and they've been anti competitive and have stifled innovation but any 3rd player is to be welcomed. Intel is keeping AMD honest in the CPU space despite being on an ancient if incredibly efficient for it's antiquity process. A fourth player would be great too. Nvidia and AMD have a duopoly and if Intel want traction in the GPU space they'll at least need to begin with something competitive in terms of price/performance. Knowing Intel they'll probably try and charge a premium over the other two but hopefully consumers will knock them back. I'm sort of pleased my 4K monitor broke so 1080ti is fine for 1080p. This time next year hopefully things will be better.


I thought AMD were going to be your saviour ?

https://forums.overclockers.co.uk/posts/34222574/

Like the 2080 Ti prices you mean ? They are just as high now as they came out and higher in some cases, this is with the 3000 series now out.

New world mate we are in and I'm also sick of the prices, but expecting AMD to be your savior or white knight with pricing will not happen, look at the pricing for the 5000 series cpus as an example, minute they had a lead they increased prices.

I'm not arguing with you mate just sadly stating reality of what is happening right now and happened only a couple of years back. Prices are shocking and so far will remain that way and with covid people stuck at home they are spending on home entertainment gear more than ever.

2080ti had an MSRP of £999 and I've seen them (other than the ludicrously overpriced STRIX for example) for less than £1000. I for one am not going to roll over, throw my arms in the air and accept the
'new World' you refer to. In January there will be plenty of 3080s and 6800XTs to be had at £650. I've seen this enough times before to know that's how it works. You said no one was going to get 3090 performance for £650 and referred to gouging etc. I said I believed it was entirely plausible to have that performance for £650 with a 6800XT. I'm not here to argue current availability I have seen members with photos of their new 3080 FE from Nvidia for £650. An overclocked 3080 comes close to a 3090 and a 6800XT is reputed to overclock very well. You said as an article of faith, this was impossible. I'm saying it's not. And incidentally AMD will be my saviour! Just you wait.

3rd player Intel is like inviting the devil to lunch with Adolf Hitler and Saddam Hussein. Intel will not be price cutting or doing anything that favours the customers, only thing they are doing now is taking up space at TSMC as that's where their gpu dies are made not even in their own fabs, so basically using up space AMD or Nvidia may have used and then remember the cards are put together somewhere too and again at same places AMD and Nvidia cards are put together so again taking up space there too.

Intel will not be helping with pricing, AMD is on a mission to play we are a premium product maker and will be pricing as high as anyone else and more (reality in the dgpu market they are seen as second class but trying to fight that image with high prices, you know because more expensive means better:cry:), Nvidia well Nvidia is Nvidia they will try to empty your wallet faster than you can say hey that's John Travolta in your wallet...

pKQQQG1.gif


Anyways good luck with future GPU prices... but I think yoda is right...

Gk3i4mI.jpg

Also Intel is not keeping AMD honest in the CPU market, more like AMD kept Intel honest, don't be fooled by Intels cpu prices this gen, the real cost is the motherboard this time that is silly high and then if you want DDR5 version well good luck.. Z690 is a rip off for any decent motherboard. All Intel did was shift the cost of the CPU to the Z690 chipset that they make too and caused motherboards to get more expensive but made their cpus look cheaper than AMD, reality is price up an AMD x570 system and a Intel z690 DDR4 system with same motherboard maker and model and then you get the real price... Intel just tried to hide the cost of the full system and making it look like the motherboard makers are being greedy (which they are too) but reality is the Z690 intel chipset is a lot more expensive this time for motherboard makers to buy and has to be passsed on to their customers. It's all smoke and mirrors by Intel to hide the truth... wait for the dgpu magic tricks they will do...;)



Also expecting customers to knock them back regarding gpu prices ...well... that worked well this gen at 2X to 3X+ the msrp and out of stock all the time :eek:?

Customers have shown what they are willing to pay for a gpu and these companies have seen that now and well...

D8lTDe6.jpg
^...Click Me...^

Now go back and read yoda picture again..
 
Last edited:
Based on past practice when Intel dominated the cpu market they excelled at greed. Minor cpu increments annually, charge a premium, stick with 4 cores mainstream and change the socket frequently to force motherboard changes with most generation updates. Doubt they would change their habits.

I really hope Intel knock it out of the park with this, We need a 3rd company in play to bring the prices back down to sane levels, Both AMD and Nvidia have gotten immensely greedy, I just hope Intel don't follow suit as I can see the ever increasing prices of GPU's eventually being detrimental to the long term health of the PC gaming market.

Intel see what prices the other 2 are charging and still can't fulfil. There is ZERO chance INTEL will help gamers with lowering GPU prices
 
Back
Top Bottom