I will make London a beacon of Islam

mrk · 20 Mar 2012 at 15:36

shoes said:
Once again, source?

Let retarded people remain retarded dude, just sit back and laugh at them.

Nitefly · 20 Mar 2012 at 15:36

BarBrawllin said:
google is your friend.

http://europenews.dk/en/node/34368

Every single thing here has sources

Pretty crap source.

shoes · 20 Mar 2012 at 15:37

AH right I see, so it's not fact at all then, it's observational conclusion at best.

Efour · 20 Mar 2012 at 15:38

lol a Danish Muslim Hate site? More Bacon!!

BarBrawllin · 20 Mar 2012 at 15:39

So that guy who's family comes from pakistan and was on the BBC news as a government reprasentitive of his people was on the BBC news telling them not to inbreed and quoting these same statistics is an idiot and just likes making fun of his own people,ok.

shoes · 20 Mar 2012 at 15:40

BarBrawllin said:
So that guy who's family comes from pakistan and was on the BBC news as a government reprasentitive of his people was on the BBC news telling them not to inbreed and quoting these same statistics is an idiot and just likes making fun of his own people,ok.

Correct.

robgmun · 20 Mar 2012 at 15:40

The Funktopus said:
I'd like to think this country would be run in a manner favoring none of the religions. Is he that desperate to get re-elected?

He is utterly desperate to be mayor again and again and would sell his grandmother if it would he could become mayor for life. God knows why he's so obsessed with this, he's already had two huge bites out of that apple.

Spenty · 20 Mar 2012 at 15:42

BarBrawllin said:
So that guy who's family comes from pakistan and was on the BBC news as a government reprasentitive of his people was on the BBC news telling them not to inbreed and quoting these same statistics is an idiot and just likes making fun of his own people,ok.

So if a family from Britain emigrates to Australia, that was inbred down the line somewhere, and had a lower IQ than the average person they should be sent back right?

BarBrawllin · 20 Mar 2012 at 15:42

shoes said:
Correct.

I beleive you :rolleyes:

elmarko · 20 Mar 2012 at 15:43

B/B

Just out of curiosity, if "race A" no longer inbred, would you still have a problem with them? - I'd wager yes.

As all those (unproven) criticisms are a result of inbreeding - which is nothing to do with race - western nations did the same kind of thing in the past (look at the Royal Families for a good example of when it continued).

steve-h · 20 Mar 2012 at 15:43

spudbynight said:
People cause so much crap.

like religion

BarBrawllin · 20 Mar 2012 at 15:44

Spenty said:
So if a family from Britain emigrates to Australia, that was inbred down the line somewhere, and had a lower IQ than the average person they should be sent back right?

the people who got sent to australia in large numbers were not first cousin relatives there was lots from scotland ireland england even dutch and a lot of others,of course some would be first cousin but they had not been inbreeding for the previous 1400 years before that.

buchtis · 20 Mar 2012 at 15:44

So desperate to get re-elected that it's embarrassing to watch. Looks like he's coming on with dementia.

shoes · 20 Mar 2012 at 15:46

BarBrawllin said:
I beleive you

Good, because I don't believe you.

I'm sorry, but you cannot simply say that a Dutch article which cites itself for half of the sources it mentions is a bona fide conclusion on inbreeding within muslim communities.

Edit: Don't get me wrong, I'm no fan of religion and I think you have to be particularly stupid, weak, impressionable, have low self esteem or a combination of all of them to have belief in a faith system which is backed purely by the fundamental fact it cannot be disproven, however, your points of view are based on something all together more sinister.

Gangster · 20 Mar 2012 at 15:47

George Hincapie said:
Time to nuke London then.

.

Marky said:
Why would we want London to be a "Beacon of Islam"? =/

For the lulz..... no idea.

BarBrawllin · 20 Mar 2012 at 15:48

elmarko1234 said:
B/B

Just out of curiosity, if "race A" no longer inbred, would you still have a problem with them? - I'd wager yes.

As all those (unproven) criticisms are a result of inbreeding - which is nothing to do with race - western nations did the same kind of thing in the past (look at the Royal Families for a good example of when it continued).

hey,dont try and call me a racist i know that website isnt very tolerent but its bang on with the info it gives regarding that specific subject and thats the only article i've read on it,i actualy found that info on another website i cant find now and just took the first google result i could find to provide a source here fast. Im mixed myself ,my cousins are mixed race and to imply im somehow racist because i know statisticly a lot of muslims are inbreeding for over 1000 years and its scientific fact what that does to people(european royal families) is bang out of order.

LOAM · 20 Mar 2012 at 15:48

Its a FACT that 78.3% of all statistics are completely made up though, Its been proven scientifically to be 100% true.

Source

Spenty · 20 Mar 2012 at 15:48

BarBrawllin said:
the people who got sent to australia in large numbers were not first cousin relatives there was lots from scotland ireland england even dutch and a lot of others,of course some would be first cousin but they had not been inbreeding for the previous 1400 years before that.

I'm not on about the people who got sent there, I am on about modern families who move over. Regardless if your family was inbred or has a lower IQ as long as you can contribute then whats the problem and don't use the benefits line as there is probably more of our own claiming benefits.

BarBrawllin · 20 Mar 2012 at 15:50

shoes said:
Good, because I don't believe you.

I'm sorry, but you cannot simply say that a Dutch article which cites itself for half of the sources it mentions is a bona fide conclusion on inbreeding within muslim communities.

Edit: Don't get me wrong, I'm no fan of religion and I think you have to be particularly stupid, weak, impressionable, have low self esteem or a combination of all of them to have belief in a faith system which is backed purely by the fundamental fact it cannot be disproven, however, your points of view are based on something all together more sinister.

Cites itslef!?!?!?! AHAHAHAHAHHAH you didnt even bother to read it did you!

http://www.reproductive-health-journal.com/content/6/1/17/table/T1
http://fpn.dk/liv/krop_valvare/article1616165.ece
http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/articleshow/msid-1298135,curpg-1.cms
http://www.new.dli.ernet.in/rawdataupload/upload/insa/INSA_1/20005bbc_407.pdf
http://www.springerlink.com/content/j65457u2532t1751/
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC392897/?page=1
http://www3.interscience.wiley.com/journal/119830633/abstract

robgmun · 20 Mar 2012 at 15:51

shoes said:
Good, because I don't believe you.

I'm sorry, but you cannot simply say that a Dutch article which cites itself for half of the sources it mentions is a bona fide conclusion on inbreeding within muslim communities.

Edit: Don't get me wrong, I'm no fan of religion and I think you have to be particularly stupid, weak, impressionable, have low self esteem or a combination of all of them to have belief in a faith system which is backed purely by the fundamental fact it cannot be disproven, however, your points of view are based on something all together more sinister.

So you completely don't believe a huge chuck of marriages in the middle east are between cousins? come on man we all hear about it growing up and i was unfortunately involved in the Bangladeshi community for a while because of my ex-wife. And i can say time and time again when one of my wife's friend or relative got married it was to a first or second cousin, they're bloody obsessed with marrying cousins over there. Seen it with my own eyes