-
Competitor rules
Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.
**Official Unigine Valley Leaderboard**
- Thread starter humbug
- Start date
Could not find my old 1600p score so did another one
Four Titans @994/1789
3930k @5.1
Bring on the R9 290Xs.
Added
Added
If I ran @1080p I would score exactly the same on 4 cards due to the CPU bottleneck.
1440p and 1600p is going to be needed in this bench as I think the 290 and 290X will be huge sellers.
AMD need to work on Driver performance with this Bench, Gibbo's bench @ 1200Mhz ranks it 26, some 26% behind the top Titan, they score 57% higher than the highest 770 and 55% higher than the highest 7970.
Incredible scaling, Nvidia have the drivers absolutely spot on, twice the scaling of AMD's drivers.
Do you have a link for Gibbo's review with valley @1200mhz
Soldato
- Joined
- 28 May 2007
- Posts
- 10,204
Hi there
Right guys, I got some voltage control, so I've done a benchmark run at 1200MHz core and 6400MHz memory, gives quite a substancial boost in performance over the 1060MHz core and 6000Mhz benchmarks I did this week.
Check them out here:-
Such a damn quick card, this now places it ahead of the 1310MHz GTX 780 I included in the review in all test.
I think these are the results kaap.
3930k@ 4.8
Titan TriSli@ 1006/6008 (stock)
1440
Uploaded with ImageShack.us
1600
Uploaded with ImageShack.us
Titan TriSli@ 1006/6008 (stock)
1440
Uploaded with ImageShack.us
1600
Uploaded with ImageShack.us
Last edited:
Soldato
- Joined
- 28 May 2007
- Posts
- 10,204
Check above mate.
Yeah, thanks. i just found it myself
So yeah #3059 @ 1200 vs 3807 @ 1372 = + 25%, take off the clock speed diffrance and your talking about +15% clock for clock.
Here you Humbug, the full set for 1600p
All @994/1789
3930k @5.1
Scaling is good for 1, 2 and 3 cards but using 4 I get hit by the CPU bottleneck even at 1600p
Single Titan
Two Titans
Three Titans
Four Titans
R9 290Xs results in a few weeks time when I have waterblocks on everything.
All @994/1789
3930k @5.1
Scaling is good for 1, 2 and 3 cards but using 4 I get hit by the CPU bottleneck even at 1600p
Single Titan
Two Titans
Three Titans
Four Titans
R9 290Xs results in a few weeks time when I have waterblocks on everything.
Soldato
- Joined
- 5 Sep 2011
- Posts
- 12,876
- Location
- Surrey
Nice scores Kaap.
1080p 1x Titan 1175/1550 4960x 4.5
CBA to cherry pick out of the 3 this is the first time I've bothered trying to clock them singularly. So timid on the stock BIOS
1080p 1x Titan 1175/1550 4960x 4.5
CBA to cherry pick out of the 3 this is the first time I've bothered trying to clock them singularly. So timid on the stock BIOS
Last edited:
Soldato
- Joined
- 2 Jan 2012
- Posts
- 12,274
- Location
- UK.
GTX 780 @ 1322mhz / 1711mhz
4770K @ 4.6Ghz
Score 3265
Original
4770K @ 4.6Ghz
Score 3265
Original
Nice scores Kaap.
1080p 1x Titan 1175/1150 4960x 4.5
CBA to cherry pick out of the 3 this is the first time I've bothered trying to clock them singularly. So timid on the stock BIOS
Thanks.
I didn't, it's just the way the clocks are written. My clocks are what I set but if you add boost to them they go a lot higher.
You also need to change whyscotty's mem speed to 1502 as I think he was just running the stock clocks. Expect a big score from whyscotty anytime soon, well when he has paid the elec bill anyway.
Here is what my cards were doing behind the scenes, I just re ran the bench using the same GPU settings but with the CPU @5.0 (I wanted to make sure I finished the bench).
If you check out the GPU load, it is all over the place where the cards are bottlenecking even @1600p. This is something we are going to see more and more of as people buy R9 290 and 290Xs and use them in multi GPU setups.
Last edited:
Soldato
- Joined
- 5 Sep 2011
- Posts
- 12,876
- Location
- Surrey
I would expect 4 cards to bottleneck but surprised 3 Titans do at 1600! That's insane.
I didn't, it's just the way the clocks are written. My clocks are what I set but if you add boost to them they go a lot higher.
You also need to change whyscotty's mem speed to 1502 as I think he was just running the stock clocks. Expect a big score from whyscotty anytime soon, well when he has paid the elec bill anyway.
Here is what my cards were doing behind the scenes, I just re ran the bench using the same GPU settings but with the CPU @5.0 (I wanted to make sure I finished the bench).
If you check out the GPU load, it is all over the place where the cards are bottlenecking even @1600p. This is something we are going to see more and more of as people buy R9 290 and 290Xs and use them in multi GPU setups.
You said
while whyscotty said
and yet your posting about 18% higher scores, The application states 1379Mhz clearly thats what it is or what its spent most of the time running at, from here on what clock rates the application display is what will get added to the leader board.
Yes, it boost all the way until it hits thermal limits or whatever power input limit is set.